My CAI..check it out
My CAI..check it out
Here it is....
Thanks to cwsttu, trainwreck517, and end3r.
Here is what it originally looked like....(pic stolen from someones write up)
Tell me what you guys think....
Thanks to cwsttu, trainwreck517, and end3r.
Here is what it originally looked like....(pic stolen from someones write up)
Tell me what you guys think....
The AFM needs to be level. At its current angle it will cause a leaner condition that its supposed to be. More air will be needed to pull the plunger with gravity helping it stay closed so fuel supply will be less than needed. It can also cause drivability problems.
Santiago
Santiago
Originally Posted by therotaryrocket
how big is the pipe? how did you enlarge that hole in the chassis? did you notice a power increase? nice job, much cleaner engine bay.
Originally Posted by 1987RX7guy
The AFM needs to be level. At its current angle it will cause a leaner condition that its supposed to be. More air will be needed to pull the plunger with gravity helping it stay closed so fuel supply will be less than needed. It can also cause drivability problems.
Santiago
Santiago
To thread starter:
Good job, looks exactly like my old one
Also, it looks like the coupler at the TB elbow is just stuffed in there? Is there anything holding it in/on? Or what? Hard to tell.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Bob Boberson
3"; drill, sheet metal cutters, pliers, a little filing, and some anti-rust paint/sealer stuff; it seems to me like there is one, but nothing huge, it could just be me, sounds pretty cool though, sounds like a better flow going through to the exhaust; ha yea on the clean engine bay, i thought about taking a picture off all of the crap i removed.
Originally Posted by dDuB
To thread starter:
Good job, looks exactly like my old one
Also, it looks like the coupler at the TB elbow is just stuffed in there? Is there anything holding it in/on? Or what? Hard to tell.
Good job, looks exactly like my old one
Also, it looks like the coupler at the TB elbow is just stuffed in there? Is there anything holding it in/on? Or what? Hard to tell.Also, the hole saw thing....I didn't have a hole saw set for a drill, so I just made do with what I had. If only I had more tools.....
Originally Posted by trainwreck517
Looks good, looks like you just used angle bends using steel pipe, if so.. what angle bends? just strait and a 90 degree?
Originally Posted by 88rxn/a
....... now to clean the front and right side of the bay. looks good!!
Thanks for the comments guys. I guess I won't be adjusting the AFM tomorrow. I checked it anyway and moved it around and it didn't make a difference that i could tell at idle or while revved.
Originally Posted by Rotary_7
where did you get the pipes and clamp thingys from???
How much was the whole setup???
Would a HKS intake fit any how???
How much was the whole setup???
Would a HKS intake fit any how???
$40 for the piping (i had some of it special ordered to get the mandrel bend)
$15 for the couplers and rings (most of it was shipping b/c it was from ebay)
$3 for the brass barbs i tapped into the pipe
$55 for the actual filter ( i was impatient and wanted to do it then so it cost a lot
more to buy it from advance)
(If you have an s4 you'll have to buy an afm adapter i think, you can get it expensive from bonez, rb, etc. or just get one cheap off of ebay)
thats a lot from what other people were saying though, you could probably get it much cheaper if you searched more.
I would think HKS filters would work the same. I don't know if I'd trust the foam version of their filters where it is. It seems much more fragile and prone to getting dirty as well.
Originally Posted by jono20
does anyone know if it would make any differnece if I had the AFM up by the TB elbow? instead of inbetween the two pipes. my CAI is exactly the same :P
The axial orientation of the S5 AFM WILL NOT affect its readings. The mounting angle inlet to outlet will not apreciably affect the S5 meter either.
It is the S4 air flow meter that relies on mounting orientation for acuracy. The S5 is not nearly as sensitive to moutning orientation/angle.
You're fine.
It is the S4 air flow meter that relies on mounting orientation for acuracy. The S5 is not nearly as sensitive to moutning orientation/angle.
You're fine.
Originally Posted by daten
What happens if you run through a deep puddle/water ?
Rocklobster, thanks for affirming the tilt issue about the s5 afm.
Originally Posted by 1987RX7guy
The AFM needs to be level. At its current angle it will cause a leaner condition that its supposed to be. More air will be needed to pull the plunger with gravity helping it stay closed so fuel supply will be less than needed. It can also cause drivability problems.
Santiago
Santiago
Originally Posted by RockLobster
The axial orientation of the S5 AFM WILL NOT affect its readings. The mounting angle inlet to outlet will not apreciably affect the S5 meter either.
It is the S4 air flow meter that relies on mounting orientation for acuracy. The S5 is not nearly as sensitive to moutning orientation/angle.
You're fine.
It is the S4 air flow meter that relies on mounting orientation for acuracy. The S5 is not nearly as sensitive to moutning orientation/angle.
You're fine.
Is it the AFM itsself thats less sensitive in teh S5? If so, is it possible to just stick an S5 AFM into an S4?
Nice setup btw, looks much better than stock.. and if you're worried about puddles at all, AEM makes that intake bypass valve, its relatively cheap
imo im not a fan of intakes that are routed into the fender area ....
i like the idea of this alot more
http://www.fc3s.org/how_tos/engine/i...x/DCP00064.jpg
just maybe done a lil more professionally with plumbing coming up from the front bump slot.
i like the idea of this alot more
http://www.fc3s.org/how_tos/engine/i...x/DCP00064.jpg
just maybe done a lil more professionally with plumbing coming up from the front bump slot.



