2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

lightweight flywheels... worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #26  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by BlueSteel
stock is 28 lbs.

~$400 Racing Beat is 17 lb. steel

~$400 SR Motorsports is 9.5 lb. aluminum

~$300 Fidanza is 8 lb. aluminum
Did you check RB's aluminum flywheel?
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #27  
soundwavetsunami's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Lakemoor, Illinois
Originally Posted by BlueSteel
stock is 28 lbs.

~$400 Racing Beat is 17 lb. steel

~$400 SR Motorsports is 9.5 lb. aluminum

~$300 Fidanza is 8 lb. aluminum
it's not just about the total weight of the flywheel. it also has to do with where the weight is located. the further a point is located from the center the more it travels. and if you have the heaviest part of a flywheel at the furthest point its going to take a lot more energy that could've been used to turn the wheels.

so it's a balance of weight and design. a poorly desiged 9 lbs flywheel will feel like a well designed 15 pound flywheel.

just my .02

Last edited by soundwavetsunami; Sep 19, 2005 at 11:38 PM. Reason: confusing wording
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2005 | 11:41 PM
  #28  
First gen man's Avatar
yessir
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sebring FL
Anyone have anything to say about this flywheel? http://www.tweakit.net/shop/product_...roducts_id=101

178 bucks with no counter weight, also how important is a counter weight?

i think that one is 9.5 pounds
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #29  
BlueSteel's Avatar
Thread Starter
No destination.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Boston area, Mass.
I dont think it can function without a counterweight.


where did you find the weight?

I think I'm going to buy that one...

Last edited by BlueSteel; Sep 20, 2005 at 10:50 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #30  
First gen man's Avatar
yessir
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sebring FL
The weight, says it in the description, or it says it on the N/A one they show. I think it's in the description of the turbo flywheel. They also sell some other flywheels. Badass website though. tweakit.net

Last edited by First gen man; Sep 20, 2005 at 02:39 PM. Reason: mispelled word
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #31  
BlueSteel's Avatar
Thread Starter
No destination.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Boston area, Mass.
too bad they're in austrailia.....$60 shipping to get it in 10 days. ouch.

what does it mean when it says it requires a 4 port style pressure plate?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #32  
drft_180sx's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
From: NYC/Stony Brook Univ.
i thought you said you have a na? the flywheel looks like its for a turbo gearbox....iirc the difference between the two is diameter...so you'd have to change quite a bit to get it to work.

The weight is about 12 pounds it says.

Jahan
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:43 PM
  #33  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
The 28 lbs is for the turbo, i think. The NA flywheel is somethign like 23.
I have an 11lb flywheel (no idea of brand) and I love it. Whenever I drive other cars they feel so sluggish when shifting.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #34  
BlueSteel's Avatar
Thread Starter
No destination.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Boston area, Mass.
Originally Posted by drft_180sx
i thought you said you have a na? the flywheel looks like its for a turbo gearbox....iirc the difference between the two is diameter...so you'd have to change quite a bit to get it to work.

The weight is about 12 pounds it says.

Jahan
That same site sells one for the n/a also
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #35  
First gen man's Avatar
yessir
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sebring FL
Originally Posted by BlueSteel
too bad they're in austrailia.....$60 shipping to get it in 10 days. ouch.

what does it mean when it says it requires a 4 port style pressure plate?

turbo engine pressure plate
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #36  
BlueSteel's Avatar
Thread Starter
No destination.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Boston area, Mass.
how do you get a turbo pressure plate on an n/a ?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #37  
First gen man's Avatar
yessir
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sebring FL
you dont lol you'd need to get a turbo flywheel and clutch tranny etc
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:47 PM
  #38  
BlueSteel's Avatar
Thread Starter
No destination.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Boston area, Mass.
"Suits 13B 6-Port engines, requires 12A/13B 4-port style pressure plate.

(Generation 1-2 / Series 1-5 non-turbo gearboxes)"



says the site
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #39  
First gen man's Avatar
yessir
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sebring FL
the N/A tweakit superlight flywheel is 10.49 pounds im still trying to figure out what there saying about the pressure plate thing
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #40  
gregk's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by RSVampire
The lightness of the flywheel has nothing to do with how the clutch engages/disengages. That's the clutch my friend. You don't need an insane clutch to hold on to a lighter flywheel. You can buy the lightest flywheel and stay with a stock clutch setup and be fine. And if you've heard of "mating issues with act and rb" you've heard wrong.
I disagree...It's a very good game but I think Donkey Kong is the best game ever.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 06:13 PM
  #41  
uRizen's Avatar
XBL** Ownicus
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, Minnnesota
I've been thinking about a lightened flywheel for my GXL but have held off because I've read in a few places that the lighter you go, the more low-end HP and torque you'll lose because the lighter flywheel doesn't have as much inertia as the stock. The gains in the upper end should make up for it though, especially if you have a S5 with the higher redline and VDI.

The other concern is having to pull the waterpump and front cover off to replace the counter-weight. That means new seals all around and you have to get the bolt off of the e-shaft pulley which was a bitch last time I did one. You also have to be very carefull pulling everything off the e-shaft so you don't screw up the needle bearings, right?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 06:14 PM
  #42  
uRizen's Avatar
XBL** Ownicus
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Originally Posted by gregk
I disagree...It's a very good game but I think Donkey Kong is the best game ever.
.... . I think you got confused, lay off the chronic yo.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #43  
BlueSteel's Avatar
Thread Starter
No destination.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Boston area, Mass.
Originally Posted by uRizen
The other concern is having to pull the waterpump and front cover off to replace the counter-weight. That means new seals all around and you have to get the bolt off of the e-shaft pulley which was a bitch last time I did one. You also have to be very carefull pulling everything off the e-shaft so you don't screw up the needle bearings, right?

Is it really that involved? they have to take the flywheel off to to remachine it anyway when changing the clutch...
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #44  
uRizen's Avatar
XBL** Ownicus
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Originally Posted by BlueSteel
Is it really that involved? they have to take the flywheel off to to remachine it anyway when changing the clutch...
Yeah, that counter-weight is in the front of the block under the front cover and that front pulley bolt is worse then the flywheel nut IMO. Especially since it's more open to corrosion then the flywheel nut is.

Here's a diagram f/ the FSM and it's order on the e-shaft:

Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:03 PM
  #45  
ScrapFC's Avatar
Emerald Triangle for life
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by uRizen
I've been thinking about a lightened flywheel for my GXL but have held off because I've read in a few places that the lighter you go, the more low-end HP and torque you'll lose because the lighter flywheel doesn't have as much inertia as the stock. The gains in the upper end should make up for it though, especially if you have a S5 with the higher redline and VDI.

The other concern is having to pull the waterpump and front cover off to replace the counter-weight. That means new seals all around and you have to get the bolt off of the e-shaft pulley which was a bitch last time I did one. You also have to be very carefull pulling everything off the e-shaft so you don't screw up the needle bearings, right?
Maybe I can help out here: The mass of your rotating assembly has nothing to do with your HP. HP is a measure of work over time. Reducing your rotating mass just lets the rotating assembly change RPM faster, thus the engine can "bog out" more easily when taking off (less kenetic energy stored in the rotating assembly) and it can rev more freely once you get going thus it feels more powerful.
As far as replacing the counterweight goes, you don't have to pull the front cover at all. The stock cast iron flywheel has a built-in rear counterweight that the lightweight steel and aluminum flywheels lack. You can either buy a counterweight with your flywheel or get a counterweight for the automatic version of your car and bolt it up.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #46  
uRizen's Avatar
XBL** Ownicus
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Oh yeah, forgot to mention that numbers 11 and 12 are fun because the first is the CAS gear so you have to be careful lining it back up when putting it back in from what I can remember so your timing is right and the second is the drive gear for the oil pump and you need to be careful with that chain.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #47  
First gen man's Avatar
yessir
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Sebring FL
scrapFC has the right idea. thanks for clearing that up.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #48  
jono20's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
From: Vernon, BC
so if I want a lighter flywheel, it only requires the flywheel, an appropriate counterweight, and the bigass flywheel wrench?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #49  
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Millville, NJ
Just use an impact gun, it takes it right off..
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #50  
uRizen's Avatar
XBL** Ownicus
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, Minnnesota
Originally Posted by ScrapFC
Maybe I can help out here: The mass of your rotating assembly has nothing to do with your HP. HP is a measure of work over time. Reducing your rotating mass just lets the rotating assembly change RPM faster, thus the engine can "bog out" more easily when taking off (less kenetic energy stored in the rotating assembly) and it can rev more freely once you get going thus it feels more powerful.
As far as replacing the counterweight goes, you don't have to pull the front cover at all. The stock cast iron flywheel has a built-in rear counterweight that the lightweight steel and aluminum flywheels lack. You can either buy a counterweight with your flywheel or get a counterweight for the automatic version of your car and bolt it up.
Sweet! I always thought it was the front counterweight that you had to swap out. I suppose it makes sense that the weight would be made up at the flywheel since that's where you're removing it in the first place. I've just been thinking like a :tard:.

The initial power loss makes sense too, it sounds like it shifts the powerband higher up the RPM range but you hit higher RPMs faster so it's all good. It just might not be the best if you like to put-put around in your FC (which you should be driving in a more spirited fashion, shame on you!).
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.