laminar flow on the inside of an intake manifold
laminar flow on the inside of an intake manifold
i was thinking about getting either ceramic or powder coat on the inside of my intake. if it was slick would this cause worse or better airflow
justin
justin
Wow, now you're getting serious!
In the bad old days old carbs, manufacturers deliberately left the inside of cast manifolds rough to provide some turbulence to aid the fuel mixing with the air. With EFI this isn't necessary due to the injectors doing a much better job of fuel atomisation than carbs, and being mounted so close to the ports.
In theory there are gains to be made, but they wouldn't be huge. An increase in port diameter would have a bigger effect. It's bloody expensive, but the ExtrudeHone process does an amazing job of enlarging ports and smoothing casting dags and bumps, and also leaves the surface much smoother. I think you'd have trouble getting complete coverage inside the runners with a spray process, but you could always give it a go!
In the bad old days old carbs, manufacturers deliberately left the inside of cast manifolds rough to provide some turbulence to aid the fuel mixing with the air. With EFI this isn't necessary due to the injectors doing a much better job of fuel atomisation than carbs, and being mounted so close to the ports.
In theory there are gains to be made, but they wouldn't be huge. An increase in port diameter would have a bigger effect. It's bloody expensive, but the ExtrudeHone process does an amazing job of enlarging ports and smoothing casting dags and bumps, and also leaves the surface much smoother. I think you'd have trouble getting complete coverage inside the runners with a spray process, but you could always give it a go!
Actually, you would have a slight fuel adhesion problem with a slick manifold like NZConvertible mentioned, even with EFI. Removing casting burrs, flashing, sharp edges, etc. is good, but you don't want a mirror-smooth finish, either.
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
Actually, you would have a slight fuel adhesion problem with a slick manifold like NZConvertible mentioned, even with EFI. Removing casting burrs, flashing, sharp edges, etc. is good, but you don't want a mirror-smooth finish, either.
Actually, you would have a slight fuel adhesion problem with a slick manifold like NZConvertible mentioned, even with EFI. Removing casting burrs, flashing, sharp edges, etc. is good, but you don't want a mirror-smooth finish, either.
My father told me that he and his friends would polish thier manifolds to "mirror-like" before they knew better.
The "surface adhesion" creates a slow-moving boundry layer at the walls of the manifold. This slows down velocity. Leaving a slight finish on the walls disturbs this boundry layer and increases efficiency.
The "surface adhesion" creates a slow-moving boundry layer at the walls of the manifold. This slows down velocity. Leaving a slight finish on the walls disturbs this boundry layer and increases efficiency.
Laminar fuel-flow polished blah blah
So, for the sake of argument, would the best thing to do be to Extrude Hone or Port & Polish, THEN rough up the surface a bit? Then you get rid of the major restrictions, increase diameter, and avoid the adhesion...
If so, about how much roughness do you need? A quick pass with 600-grit? Shot-peening? A quick pass with a stiff wire bottle brush on a flex shaft drill?
I'm doing a manifold soon...
If so, about how much roughness do you need? A quick pass with 600-grit? Shot-peening? A quick pass with a stiff wire bottle brush on a flex shaft drill?
I'm doing a manifold soon...
Trending Topics
Re: Laminar fuel-flow polished blah blah
Originally posted by Merovign
So, for the sake of argument, would the best thing to do be to Extrude Hone or Port & Polish, THEN rough up the surface a bit? Then you get rid of the major restrictions, increase diameter, and avoid the adhesion...
If so, about how much roughness do you need? A quick pass with 600-grit? Shot-peening? A quick pass with a stiff wire bottle brush on a flex shaft drill?
I'm doing a manifold soon...
So, for the sake of argument, would the best thing to do be to Extrude Hone or Port & Polish, THEN rough up the surface a bit? Then you get rid of the major restrictions, increase diameter, and avoid the adhesion...
If so, about how much roughness do you need? A quick pass with 600-grit? Shot-peening? A quick pass with a stiff wire bottle brush on a flex shaft drill?
I'm doing a manifold soon...
Okay, problem #2: Half of y'all are saying "small performance increase," the other half are saying "huge performance increase."
Paul Yaw ('Da Man'), who admittedly does his proting with a flowbench, does claim significant increases.
Has anybody done a Before/After dyno on their project here?
If I get my engine going this summer, I might do just that, in fact I'm thinking:
Stock 86 manfiold dyno (w/headers, cold air intake, pineapple ports)
Stock 89 VDI intakePorted 89 VDI intake
The engine _might_ be mildly ported & have 89 rotors/balance kit.
Anyone want to donate a VDI intake complete or sell it cheap?
FloKote info: http://www.sonic.net/~sc7500/
Check out the Technical Data
Paul Yaw ('Da Man'), who admittedly does his proting with a flowbench, does claim significant increases.
Has anybody done a Before/After dyno on their project here?
If I get my engine going this summer, I might do just that, in fact I'm thinking:
Stock 86 manfiold dyno (w/headers, cold air intake, pineapple ports)
Stock 89 VDI intakePorted 89 VDI intake
The engine _might_ be mildly ported & have 89 rotors/balance kit.
Anyone want to donate a VDI intake complete or sell it cheap?

FloKote info: http://www.sonic.net/~sc7500/
Check out the Technical Data
Originally posted by Merovign
Paul Yaw ('Da Man'), who admittedly does his proting with a flowbench, does claim significant increases
Paul Yaw ('Da Man'), who admittedly does his proting with a flowbench, does claim significant increases
I meant significant increases in HP - he does the testing on an engine dyno. I don't recall any numbers from that - when we chatted a couple of years ago I think he was talking 10-15 RWHP.
IIRC he was talking about airflow increases of around 30%... but unfortunately he's so busy as far as I know he's not taking much in the way of new projects now...
Still, we need fresh dyno numbers. I need to find a good dyno locally...
IIRC he was talking about airflow increases of around 30%... but unfortunately he's so busy as far as I know he's not taking much in the way of new projects now...
Still, we need fresh dyno numbers. I need to find a good dyno locally...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tiger18
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Sep 3, 2015 08:27 PM




