Intrax or Eibach springs?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Intrax or Eibach springs?
Ok, which springs do you guys prefer? Seems like it's a lot cheaper than getting coilovers. Plus I'm not sure if I'd take total advantage of coilovers. So the Eibach's are only a 0.8inch drop where as Intrax are 1.6 inch drop. Any reviews, comments about these?
#2
Everyone bashes the Intrax. They work great for me though. A year and a half and no problems. Well worth $240. Car ends up sitting about 1 inch lower because the stock springs are already sagging.
#7
Who owns the Chiefs?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dept 5, Ontario. Canada
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by HeffBoost
I like the progressive rate aspect of the Eibachs.
I like the progressive rate aspect of the Eibachs.
Racing Beat without question. Only a mild drop, but they are specifically designed spring rates for the FC. That's where it's at.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IM very happy with my eibachs, but im sure the racing beats are very nice as well. I personally would stay away from the intrax, but thats just my opinion.
#10
The Intrax are indeed progressive, but i had a friend who put some on his car, and he put a lot of miles on them. To be honest, the Tokico HP's failed first after like 100k miles. I consider them a very high quality prduct.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post