2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

If you were building an FC for fun in 2018...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-18, 03:57 PM
  #1  
Full Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
henyaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Morrisville
Posts: 50
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If you were building an FC for fun in 2018...

For a dedicated fun/street car and is also pretty well stripped and lightened.
So lets say you could either:

1. Build a billet aluminum 13B (Promaz or Billet Inc. etc...), keeping it NA and run around 210whp
2. Keep the irons, use a turbo and be closer to 350 or 400whp

The NA having the reliability advantage, and also lighter weight (Billet block and NA drivetrain). Plus its a bit higher tech with a newer block. Alternatively have more WHP, but also the complexity and wear that turbo territory brings.
No PP due to volume and street-ability hence the HP ranges. No V8 because no.

If I were rich I'd do a build of each but unfortunately I am not.
Knowing what we know now over the years (Reliability vs power, heat etc...)
I'm addicted to the idea of both, but can only afford one for our project.
Old 08-28-18, 11:46 PM
  #2  
Dak
Information Regurgitator

 
Dak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sparta TN. United States
Posts: 1,889
Received 170 Likes on 127 Posts
If it were me since I've always kicked around going turbo. I'd go that route. For the money that a billet engine would cost you could switch to a REW( if you can find one in stock).
Old 08-29-18, 06:50 AM
  #3  
B O R I C U A

iTrader: (14)
 
KNONFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 5,480
Received 35 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Dak
If it were me since I've always kicked around going turbo. I'd go that route. For the money that a billet engine would cost you could switch to TWO BRAND NEW REW( if you can find one in stock) and have some money left over.
^FIXED

If staying at 200RWHP NA, a billet engine is a serious overkill, basically the only thing you are gaining is the weight savings. Since we are dreaming here, I would rock a 3 rotor (short crank) PP NA engine, preferably done with 12A rotors and rotors housings.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OdyOwnage
South RX-7 Forum
9
08-22-18 09:32 PM
reddozen
Deals Gap Rotary Rally
22
04-17-18 11:20 AM



Quick Reply: If you were building an FC for fun in 2018...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.