2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Idea for water temp sender location (turbo cars)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-05, 10:15 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Omaha
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Idea for water temp sender location (turbo cars)

Ok, on the turbo II cars, the stock turbo is oil and water cooled. The water that comes from the lower intake manifold needs to be blocked when you get an only oil cooled turbo.
My question is, is that port, off the LIM, before the thermostat or after? It would be nice to be able to put the water temp sender there.
Thanks
Tyler
Old 02-07-05, 02:48 AM
  #2  
Keep Right Except to Pass

 
HeffBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The only thing cut out of the loop by the thermostat is the radiator.
Attached Thumbnails Idea for water temp sender location (turbo cars)-coolantpath.jpg  
Old 02-07-05, 02:50 AM
  #3  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Why?
If you're going to block it off, then it's sorta like a dead end.
We stuff the aftermarket water temp sensor right after the thermostat cause it's the hottest parts of the engine and will tend to show the most accurate water temps.


-Ted
Old 02-07-05, 05:55 AM
  #4  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Goodbar6
...the stock turbo is oil and water cooled.
Actually it's oil lubricated and water cooled. The water does the bulk of the cooling and the turbo would quickly fry without it even with the oil flowing.

...is that port, off the LIM, before the thermostat or after? It would be nice to be able to put the water temp sender there.
As Ted said, it would be a dead end and hence would not resond properly to actual engine temps. Bad idea.
Old 02-07-05, 06:28 AM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
White_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
Actually it's oil lubricated and water cooled. The water does the bulk of the cooling and the turbo would quickly fry without it even with the oil flowing.

As much as i'd hate to disagree with someone across the tasman, the oil does cool the turbo quite sufficiently.
I ran mine without it for a couple of months, no ill effect on the bearings.
Same with a cousin of mine, did it to his for a good year or so.
Old 02-08-05, 03:30 AM
  #6  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Interesting to hear. I still wouldn't call it "sufficient" cooling though, since water-cooled turbos have much lower oil flow than older air/oil-cooled turbos. I certainly wouldn't do it or recommend it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cam_7779
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
08-18-15 07:48 AM
LMBTG
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
08-15-15 01:43 PM



Quick Reply: Idea for water temp sender location (turbo cars)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.