I want a vert......
Try to get the 89-91, because they come with newer body style and have a updated 13B engine. Of course the later the model the better. As for options, I have a 91 and they basically came with every options mazda offered, except a turbo.
But you can fix that by doing a TII conversion.
Get a compression test on the engine and try to get any maintance records and history of the car. See if the pervious own was a rotary fans and knows much about rotary engines. You can tell alot about the car from the owner. 1990-91 rx7 vert were pretty expensive new (~$27,000 in 1991), so they were mostly brought as second cars and were pampered and should have low mileage. I got my in 98 with only 45K miles and I was only the second owner. Expect to pay about $6,000 or more for a low milage 91 vert in good condition.
Good luck!
But you can fix that by doing a TII conversion. Get a compression test on the engine and try to get any maintance records and history of the car. See if the pervious own was a rotary fans and knows much about rotary engines. You can tell alot about the car from the owner. 1990-91 rx7 vert were pretty expensive new (~$27,000 in 1991), so they were mostly brought as second cars and were pampered and should have low mileage. I got my in 98 with only 45K miles and I was only the second owner. Expect to pay about $6,000 or more for a low milage 91 vert in good condition.
Good luck!
jimtesla,
I know what you mean, that is one sweet rx-7.
Really any year is good, just make sure the engine passes a compression test and the car is in good-excellent shape. Otherwise you'd want to pay $1-$2K for one with a blown engine and then have a rebuild done for $3-$4K.
Either way, you should come out fairly close to real world value.
I think leather and stickshift (vs automatic) would be the options I would want. I believe those were the main ones.
Note the automatic can suck up to 25% of the power - but if you want it as a daily in rush hour traffic, then you might be willing to take that.
I had also wondered if the 929-S transmission could be retrofitted since it can handle 200hp / ft-lbs torque. I don't think it sucks as much HP.
I know what you mean, that is one sweet rx-7.
Really any year is good, just make sure the engine passes a compression test and the car is in good-excellent shape. Otherwise you'd want to pay $1-$2K for one with a blown engine and then have a rebuild done for $3-$4K.
Either way, you should come out fairly close to real world value.
I think leather and stickshift (vs automatic) would be the options I would want. I believe those were the main ones.
Note the automatic can suck up to 25% of the power - but if you want it as a daily in rush hour traffic, then you might be willing to take that.
I had also wondered if the 929-S transmission could be retrofitted since it can handle 200hp / ft-lbs torque. I don't think it sucks as much HP.
Last edited by vaughnc; Sep 12, 2001 at 10:49 AM.
Originally posted by vaughnc
I think leather and stickshift (vs automatic) would be the options I would want. I believe those were the main ones.
I think leather and stickshift (vs automatic) would be the options I would want. I believe those were the main ones.
Everything else was standard including leather.
Originally posted by vaughnc
[Note the automatic can suck up to 25% of the power - [/B]
[Note the automatic can suck up to 25% of the power - [/B]
Dave




