2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

I feel like its my first day...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 16, 2003 | 08:42 PM
  #1  
Jarod2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Colroado
I feel like its my first day...

I made a post here about a year ago with an almost identicle question.

Are Turbo2's as reliable as n/a's? If not, why? What are the factors? Also, what are any other disadvantages of a turbo? Thanks guys.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2003 | 08:58 PM
  #2  
Amur_'s Avatar
Refined Valley Dude
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
N/As pretty much never have to worry about detonation trashing apex seals...


Who's got the next nugget.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2003 | 09:02 PM
  #3  
osiris7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
My t2 is my daily driver..just as long as you take car of it and mod the car properly than you really have nothing to worry about..If you want a car that has enough power to put a hurt on newer cars than this is the car for you..
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 12:00 AM
  #4  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
N/A's generally last longer, but I've seen a few TII's top 130k on the original engine. There aren't really any disadvantages having a TII. You just have to be careful when modding, and just regular maintenance.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 02:35 AM
  #5  
rotary>piston's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
From: Boulder, CO
depends completely on how it was treated before. A hard-driven turbo won't last nearly as long as a hard-driven N/A.
Also, it's a lot easier to screw up when modding a turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 07:28 AM
  #6  
Josepi's Avatar
Despise Enmity
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally posted by turborexron
N/A's generally last longer, but I've seen a few TII's top 130k on the original engine. There aren't really any disadvantages having a TII. You just have to be careful when modding, and just regular maintenance.
My turbo has lasted 103,000 miles itself...

(it needs rebuild/replacement).

I'm guessing as long as I don't do any damage to the motor myself, it'll last to 150K easy.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 08:12 AM
  #7  
TheBigOne's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: 415 -> 707
160K

Mine is at about 160K now.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 10:22 AM
  #8  
osiris7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
yeah man is at 125k, still hauls ***..my secret passed down from the original owner is to take a 16 oz bottle of MMO 8oz in the engine,after evry oil change 2500miles,8oz in the gas every fillup..
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 12:00 PM
  #9  
skyypilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
What the hell is MMO?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #10  
bob13bt's Avatar
Fixed the wheelhop
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Marvel Mystery Oil
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #11  
Fitness Stain's Avatar
Yar-Har-Har
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, 37217
my turbo II has 188,000.....
it needs a rebuild now, but it still runs and kicks much ***!!!!
all i need is a rebuild and the car will be top notch.....well....i also need to upgrade the turbo, but soon enough!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
renjiv2
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
57
Jan 25, 2024 03:34 AM
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
Aug 6, 2017 01:41 PM
SSpyderX
1st Gen General Discussion
0
Sep 29, 2015 04:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM.