2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Hybrid Turbo ?'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-02, 10:18 PM
  #26  
"Just Looking".......

 
FEDREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Treasure Coast, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Ranzo
damn am I slow to posting to this or what? anyway I ran a turbonetics H3 compressor upgrade with 720's in the secondaries and I put 316.9Hp to the ground boosting less than 14 psi.
What's the difference between a H3 compressor and a TO4E-46 compressor?
Old 04-07-02, 11:13 PM
  #27  
Junior Member

 
bdc196's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Grand Prairie, TX USA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by FEDREX

I'll be happy with whatever 13-14psi gets me. Thanks for the info -

What's CHRA??? (compressor housing....?)
CHRA stands for 'Center Housing and Rotating Assembly' -- the cast-iron made housing that houses the centre shaft loaded on seals and/or ball bearings that runs an oil jacket (and sometimes water jacket) through it. The CHRA mates the compressor and the turbine together.

... and Ted's right -- The 46 trim won't make much. Reading the compressor map, and figuring roughly 10lbs/min of airflow to create 100bhp in the 13B rotary engine (there are a zillion factors that will change this figure), the compressor will be marching right outside of its best efficiency zone and not be worth it. In short, it's marginally too small for that desired power output.

B
Old 04-07-02, 11:17 PM
  #28  
Junior Member

 
bdc196's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Grand Prairie, TX USA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by FEDREX

What's the difference between a H3 compressor and a TO4E-46 compressor?
The H3 TO4B spec looks like a much more efficient compressor as compared to the TO4E-46. It's probably also physically bigger. I'd have to check my Turbonetics catalogue to know for certain.

B
Old 04-07-02, 11:23 PM
  #29  
Just Call Me Terminator!

iTrader: (4)
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Ranzo
although it is a true garrett turbine it looks to be about the same as a H3. It is hard to tell by a picture. If you could take it apart and maybe get a part number for the compressor then you could get a flow map for it to know hom much CFM it flows at what boost. Then let the tuning begin.

Randy....
its already on the car i'm not taking it off right now i'm running a panspeed ecu and its running great
Old 04-07-02, 11:23 PM
  #30  
Junior Member

 
bdc196's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Grand Prairie, TX USA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by FEDREX

That would also depend on injector duty cycle and boost psi. Using 4 550's and one 720 all peaking at 75% duty cycle should be over 300hp.

I've also been told by the guys at JapTrix that I'll be over 300 when they're thru.
If I only reach 300 I'll still be happy because I didn't need a true TO4, or a E6K, or an exhaust manifold. 375 or 400 hp isn't necessary for me on this car. I'm waiting for a new RX-7 (if it's built) or will get a Supra TT and go nuts.

The tech at Majestic informed me that this compressor wheel (no clip) in conjunction with the Stage III t/w will flow for 320+. In addition, the shop I visited that I'm taking my car to that runs a 10sec FC agrees.
The shop or 10-sec FC car has nothing to do with the merits of the argument for or against the 300hp/320hp figure. Regardless of what they say, there needs to be some real math and such to justify this. I'm with Ted, generally speaking, on these issues as he's got extensive knowledge in this area as well as a nack for mathematics, mechanical engineering, engine workings, etc. He knows his way around on that. Based on what I saw, the compressor would have to output between 16 and 18psig of positive output pressure (with respect to its output airflow) to come near the potential power output. That's also not figuring the flow-ability of the turbine housing to move that much mass air at a given engine RPM.

The injectors, etc. etc. don't determine the general power output as they're, at best, only 1/11th of the amount of air/fuel mixture being introduced into the chamber. In short, usable power is directly proportional to the amount of mass air the engine can pass in and out, which is directly determined by its air source or positive-pressure air pump, the turbocharger.

B
Old 04-08-02, 03:01 AM
  #31  
Senior Member

 
Ranzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis, Japan
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The shop or 10-sec FC car has nothing to do with the merits of the argument for or against the 300hp/320hp figure. Regardless of what they say, there needs to be some real math and such to justify this. I'm with Ted, generally speaking, on these issues as he's got extensive knowledge in this area as well as a nack for mathematics, mechanical engineering, engine workings, etc. He knows his way around on that. Based on what I saw, the compressor would have to output between 16 and 18psig of positive output pressure (with respect to its output airflow) to come near the potential power output. That's also not figuring the flow-ability of the turbine housing to move that much mass air at a given engine RPM.

The injectors, etc. etc. don't determine the general power output as they're, at best, only 1/11th of the amount of air/fuel mixture being introduced into the chamber. In short, usable power is directly proportional to the amount of mass air the engine can pass in and out, which is directly determined by its air source or positive-pressure air pump, the turbocharger.

I agree that it has only to do with the flow rating of the turbine and the BSFC of the Engine that it is attached to it. Just because a turbine can flow X amount of air does not mean that your car will make X amount of horpower. In a similar light it does not matter how much air you are flowing if you don't have the fuel to support it the power will not be there and this will most likely lead to a blown engine.

According to the Turbonetics flow map for a H3 compressor at 14psi there is enough flow for about 320 HP.

Randy....
Old 04-08-02, 08:27 PM
  #32  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
When it comes to shooting turbo power, it's all about POTENTIAL.&nbsp We cannot give you the EXACT power you're going to make, but we can give you a good estimate on the POTENTIAL.&nbsp Like bdc196 said, it's about the math...

I base my numbers on cars that have run most of these compressor upgrades.&nbsp My numbers are (on average) on the very conservative side.&nbsp I usually put that disclaimer in every once in a while.


-Ted
Old 04-16-02, 12:24 AM
  #33  
Senior Member

 
FEARED7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reted,
can you tell me why carbon seals can't handle over 15psi? I want to know your response....
Old 04-16-02, 12:41 AM
  #34  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally posted by FEARED7
can you tell me why carbon seals can't handle over 15psi? I want to know your response....
Carbon seal in the turbo, right?&nbsp This has just been my experience.&nbsp There are others who will claim the turbo will handle over 15psi of boost reliably - I tend to disagree.

The carbon seal was designed so that turbos could run in "draw-through" carburator systems.&nbsp This means both air and fuel are sucked in and pressurized by the turbo.&nbsp The fuel would normally leak past the other type of seal (i.e. dynamic seal), so you couldn't run a dynamic seal with this type of fuel system.&nbsp These turbos were never meant to boost over 1 bar of boost anyways - early turbochargers were never meant to boost over 1 bar of boost either.&nbsp The dynamic seal changed all of this - with the use of a dynamic seal, you could boost until the turbo or the motor would blow itseld to pieces.&nbsp Turbos boosting over 20psi and even over 30psi are all dynamic seal turbos.&nbsp All your modern day turbos are all dynamic seal turbos...

I've torn down a LOT of stock Zenki turbos, and these carbon seals "chip" due to the extreme speeds the shafts and wheels turn to push boost pressures over 14psi.&nbsp We're talking surge pressures that probably spin the turbo over 100,000RPM!&nbsp This carbon seal contacts a position "dowel", which means the face of the carbon seal is spinning at the shaft speed while pressed (by a light speed) on an aluminum shaft spacer!&nbsp How'd you like to be that little carbon seal pressed against an aluminum spacer while you're spinning over 100,000RPM - YEOW!



-Ted
Old 04-16-02, 01:15 AM
  #35  
1JZ powered

 
jspecracer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow!!! RETed, I've said it before and I'll say it again...


...you the man...
Old 04-16-02, 01:32 AM
  #36  
Senior Member

 
Ranzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis, Japan
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Damn did Ted explain that **** or what!!!???

Hey Chris, your mods take up half the page man, oh yeah and what was that girls name again??

most stock turbines are not designed to boost more than 1 kilo or 14psi. If you are lucky enough to have a kouki turbo then you are in better shape than most. The R33 skylines and such have ceramic internals and the exhaust blades are some type of plastic. One good trip to 17psi and the turbine will usually self destruct, if not then inside of three months you will be replacing it.

If you feel the need to boost more than 14psi on a stock turbine then I would reccomend getting a more efficent compressor to make the same power at a lower boost.
Old 04-16-02, 01:42 AM
  #37  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
Manolis_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's the Kouki turbo good for? I talked to one of the guys down at mazdatrix, and he said that it was around 15psi, but he seemed a bit reluctant to give me a 'definite' number
Old 04-16-02, 01:50 AM
  #38  
Senior Member

 
FEARED7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey REted,
I built a turbo for a customer of mine. H3 To4B style with a stock turbine wheel clipped to my specs. The car went a 12.3 at 114mph on 18" radial tires and a boggin 1.9 60 foot. That is around 320 RWHP out of that turbo at 17 psi. Since then I have upgraded that to my stage 3 and he says that turbo rips the H3 a new one and guess what?? Stock turbine wheel clipped more! He says he will be dip in the 11's soon! He just popped his rear casing, so he will be back on track soon... I know some of your turbo talk is bad wrong...
Old 04-16-02, 02:25 AM
  #39  
Senior Member

 
FEARED7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry if I posted this twice.

Reted,
Your opinion on 15psi on the carbon seal is wrong. I have built many many carbon sealed turbochargers that blew way way more than 15 psi of boost! You really want to know why carbon seals leak??
An encapsulated carbon seal in the HT18 has a spring and a little black o ring inside of it. When that o ring gets some age on it, or see gassy oil, it prunes up and therefore leaks oil into the compressor side of the turbocharger. It has nothing to do with boost or the carbon seal cracking. The cracking only happens when the encapsulated carbon seal is improperly installed and improperly assembled.
Carbon is a really hard substance and it takes heat like the best of them. But since there is constant oil surrounding the carbon seal, heat and friction is at a minimum.
Bryan
www.bnrsupercars.com
Old 04-16-02, 01:26 PM
  #40  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Bryan Smith? Previously of RotorSports (or something like that)?

Crap, Vegas buffet strikes again "(by a light speed)" should be "light spring" - that didn't make any sense.



-Ted
Old 04-16-02, 01:57 PM
  #41  
I HATE sleepy eyes

 
BoostedRotors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RETed
Bryan Smith? Previously of RotorSports (or something like that)?

Crap, Vegas buffet strikes again "(by a light speed)" should be "light spring" - that didn't make any sense.



-Ted
Different Bryan, previously of Turbo Specialties.
Old 04-16-02, 10:44 PM
  #42  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Bryan who?



-Ted
Old 04-18-02, 10:17 PM
  #43  
Senior Member

 
FEARED7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whose your daddy? lol j/k Bryan Nickell
Old 04-18-02, 10:41 PM
  #45  
Senior Member

 
FEARED7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Chris. Email me at BNRsupercars@aol.com and I will get back to ya on that question.
Bryan
Old 04-19-02, 03:18 AM
  #46  
Rotary Freak

 
Jerk_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FEARED7 will keep you updated via e-mail on you turbo while he's working on it.
Old 04-19-02, 04:52 PM
  #48  
"Just Looking".......

 
FEDREX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Treasure Coast, FL
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just got off the phone with Robert (Tech at Majestic Turbo) as I had some questions after reading these posts. He's the guy that built my turbo - I am simply relaying what I was informed:

According to him, the reason the carbon seals in the HT-18's go **** up is heat and age, not psi. Part of what they do during the rebuild process is put in new seals - he confirmed that I have a new carbon seal in this turbo.

I then asked him some stuff about flow and hp. At 15psi, he estimated somewhere around 30lbs./min for approx. 600CFM.

Regarding HP, this turbo is efficient to about 20+psi ( I won't be running that high, obviously)
As for dyno numbers, Civics and Integras have been putting down 300-320 at the wheels with the same turbo at 18psi.

From what I gathered it sounds like the weak point would actually be the engine.

When asked why they didn't do a clip, he said the new Stage III t/w that they installed already comes with an 8 degree clip from the factory.

As for milling of the housings to accept the wheels - 40/1000's of an inch.

Last edited by FEDREX; 04-19-02 at 06:32 PM.
Old 04-19-02, 05:48 PM
  #49  
Senior Member

 
FEARED7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Fedrex. Thanks for informing us with Roberts opinion. I am sure he is very reputable. A new barbon seal is a must! The O ring cracks after a long period of time... As for a turbine wheel clip. The factory turbine wheel has too be clipped in order to increase the efficiency of it. After you go so far, you must replace it with either: T3 High Flow, 0 trim,69 trim, or P trim. Then you are maxed out on Compressor wheels. I can go to a T04S style wheel, but lots of modifying and custom parts have to be made! Lots of time and thought too...


Quick Reply: Hybrid Turbo ?'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.