2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

HP is over-rated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #1  
dean23's Avatar
Thread Starter
pwned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Northern Indiana
HP is over-rated

by looking at my budget, im a little short on cash (aren't we all? damn rx7's) and decided with my kind of budget, 500 hp is going to be hard to attain. atleast in a DD. so i decided to look at it at a more mathmatical view. im no longer going to HP goals, but power vs. weight goals. 6.5 lbs per HP is what im aiming for. and thats more than enough to satisfy my needs. i figure if i can get to 450 hp (which should be easy with a turbo upgrade and some other goodies ) and drop my weight to ~2500 lbs, ill have the feel of a much faster car, with more reliability. does anyone look at theyre car like this? or is it jsut me.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #2  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
I will say this, that if your budget wouldn't allow for 1.5-2 times your estimated costs, you will probably run out of money before expected. I'm doing a rebuild and some really basic power upgrades and it's costing significantly more than I had planned, some of the things just because I've had problems along the way and some because I just missed something. So if you plan meticulously, maybe you wouldn't have this problem quite as much.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 11:06 PM
  #3  
dean23's Avatar
Thread Starter
pwned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Northern Indiana
o i know to expect more than what you think your going to need, im just saying focusing on more than just power will give you a more reliable, and just as "fast" car, for the same, or less money than just a "fast" car.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #4  
NoDOHC's Avatar
Automatic = Power drain
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Yeah, 450 hp in a 2800 lb car is scary fast, I would expect it to be faster yet in a 2500 lb car. Maybe I am taking it to an even further extreme, but do you really need (or have any use for) 450 hp in your car?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 11:16 PM
  #5  
cmanns's Avatar
Smoke moar
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 1
From: The yay, California
Originally Posted by NoDOHC
Yeah, 450 hp in a 2800 lb car is scary fast, I would expect it to be faster yet in a 2500 lb car. Maybe I am taking it to an even further extreme, but do you really need (or have any use for) 450 hp in your car?
to be cool of course.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 12:31 AM
  #6  
hhn2002's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: fl
^well said

dean of course ur thinking of reducing weight to compensate for a lower horsepower goal will add more reliability and you are not alone in that thought. much like how a simple 4.3 ring gear swap will multiply power to the ground if only a few percentages but the bigger the power the more free horses.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 12:48 AM
  #7  
MetalManipulator's Avatar
The Ultimate Drive
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races."

-Carroll Shelby
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 01:34 AM
  #8  
Juje's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by MetalManipulator
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races."

-Carroll Shelby
Wtf?

Don't bring in any of that Mustang BS! I think he forgot to mention that his cars are **** and only go in a straight line.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 01:53 AM
  #9  
user 72081209812's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Average RPM HP, average RPM torque, and weight wins races.

Anyways, power to weight ratio is more important to my power goals right now than getting a high hp number to brag about. Its going to be an awesome spring when I completely gut my interior and take everything unneeded in my engine bay.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 02:15 AM
  #10  
RB_eater's Avatar
Leah Dizon > Roast Beef
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: Québec
Originally Posted by Juje
Wtf?

Don't bring in any of that Mustang BS! I think he forgot to mention that his cars are **** and only go in a straight line.
+1. HP and torque are the same thing expressed in different ways.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 10:01 AM
  #11  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
How many compromises are you willing to make to save weight? Are you comfortable driving around a tin can with no interior? That's about the only negative to dropping weight. It takes a LOT of little things to add up to a few hundred pounds and by that point you've made a lot of sacrifices.

For example, pulling up the floor insulation will completely change the character of the car. Road noise will increase a lot, the floor will become hot enough to melt shoes, every little creak and rattle will be heard, etc.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 10:45 AM
  #12  
kustomizingkid's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 366
Likes: 1
From: USA
Originally Posted by Juje
Wtf?

Don't bring in any of that Mustang BS! I think he forgot to mention that his cars are **** and only go in a straight line.
Totaly true, I mean the Shelby Cobras were total piles back in the 60's, terribly slow with terrible handling right?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #13  
breckboarder55's Avatar
big port + big turbo=
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: 10 mins from Texas World Speedway
I have a stripped hatch, no ps, no ac, no emissions, single exhaust, no sound system ,exc. It adds up to significant weight savings

I dont know how much your budget is or what you have so far, but its alot more than just a turbo kit to make that kind of power.

Id say im about at where you would like to be.

and if your looking for someone to tell you that that is the way to go it it... if you dont mind sacrificing comfort, exc.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #14  
MmSadda's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Columbus, OH
Originally Posted by hiideruhiro
Average RPM HP, average RPM torque, and weight wins races.

Anyways, power to weight ratio is more important to my power goals right now than getting a high hp number to brag about. Its going to be an awesome spring when I completely gut my interior and take everything unneeded in my engine bay.
quoted for truth.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #15  
MidnightOwl's Avatar
2 Rotors, 1 Turbo
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Hewlett Packard is overrated.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:42 PM
  #16  
skatingsamurai's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 4
From: Co springs, co
so are ipods.....and air....
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #17  
Stanello's Avatar
backslash beanbagrace
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,141
Likes: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
Carroll Shelby being a drag racer??? WTF LOL!
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #18  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
This is a TECH SECTION, respond accordingly. This guy gets it:
Originally Posted by breckboarder55
I have a stripped hatch, no ps, no ac, no emissions, single exhaust, no sound system ,exc. It adds up to significant weight savings

I dont know how much your budget is or what you have so far, but its alot more than just a turbo kit to make that kind of power.

Id say im about at where you would like to be.

and if your looking for someone to tell you that that is the way to go it it... if you dont mind sacrificing comfort, exc.
Good thoughts. Also keep in mind whoever might be riding along in the car. My wife has made it clear (and she really can't help it I guess, she gets aches and pains much easier than I do) that she would ride in my '7 less if I make it louder or ride significantly rougher. Eventually I may have a dedicated track '7, but this one has to cater to both worlds.

By the way it is 'et cetera', abbreviated to etc.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:58 PM
  #19  
KompressorLOgic's Avatar
I
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,755
Likes: 12
From: Spanaway, WA
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
How many compromises are you willing to make to save weight? Are you comfortable driving around a tin can with no interior? That's about the only negative to dropping weight. It takes a LOT of little things to add up to a few hundred pounds and by that point you've made a lot of sacrifices.

For example, pulling up the floor insulation will completely change the character of the car. Road noise will increase a lot, the floor will become hot enough to melt shoes, every little creak and rattle will be heard, etc.
lol i drive a tin can!! daily drove this car for over a yr... if it was running better id still be daily driving it... you can probably shed around 200+. doing some extreme lightening. i still never striped the tar off the floor tho.... thats one of the last things i might do when im not so lazy...

its great no one can try and bum a ride off me!! haha ive still got a heater on a switch tho for defrost! ( yes ive gotten rid of that ghetto *** steering wheel)
a high performance 3" single exit exhaust actaully offers quite a weight reduction by it self.. the stock catback and main cat weigh around 65lbs.



this car actually came mostly gutted out, iand what peices were left were somewhat moudy. so i peeled off the dash vynle and removed what was left.
dont think ill strip another car.... but this ones staying how it is anyway
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #20  
ericgrau's Avatar
Clean.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
I'd think 2500lbs. should be possible without gutting the interior. Not easy tho. The thing is you'd only be gaining a 5-10% boost in speed from dropping 5-10% of your weight.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:05 PM
  #21  
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
rotors excite me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 9
From: Central Iowa
Weight reduction is still cheap, and really 5% is nothing to scoff at.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #22  
p4nc7's Avatar
Passenger
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Brampton
2500 lbs+450hp will be damn fast car. But really, is it practical to have that on tap? I'd imagine anything with your weight savings goal that 350 ish should more than suffice.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #23  
gnomesliv's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Northglenn, CO
The cheapest way to improve horsepower is to loose the mass in the acceleration equation. This is what I plan on doing first. Taking out seats not used etc..
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #24  
synergy7's Avatar
______
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: Florida
(Old topic) However, power to weight is the name of the game. Most every component works best on a lighter chassis (e.g. suspension, brakes). In a street car my suggestion is more power. I say this because to get a car light for the street it is impractical (no power anything, a/c heater, carpet, dash, sound deadening, any type of heat shield, plexiglass windows). Reducing weight is much easier said than done.

But if you are just itching to lighten the car I would do the hatch and the hood as they are both heavy and you will see big results there, more than any other reductions put together outside of getting fiberglass doors.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #25  
dean23's Avatar
Thread Starter
pwned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
From: Northern Indiana
the thing is that im not looking for some drasticly stripped car. and im keeping my ps and anti-lock, because this is a DD, and i like to drive comfy. but there are little thinngs to change.

say a mit of a smaller iC, because the size of mine is useless, and is also dented in pretty bad from my dads truck hitch . if got a lighter flywheel for that tad of quicker acceleration and light rims. ill be getting even lighter rims to compensate for the larger tires required for a USUABLE amount of power. i even have racing seats right now that are at LEAST half the weight of the stock seats, but they suck to drive in for long periods, so im keeping the stock till i get some more comfy seats. i honostly think 2600 lbs is a decent spot to stay at, for my needs atleast, and mid 400 up 500 would be nice. no1 says that ill behaving that amount of power ALL the time either, thats what's nice about turbos
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.