2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

HP differences for RB 2.5/3" turboback?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #26  
$100T2's Avatar
On the prowl for an FB
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 6
From: Surrounded by Sebey parts, Rhode Island
Originally posted by TooMuch4You
Slap me if this is a dumb question (i'm kinda new), but would you need fuel mods before slapping this exhaust on?

You would need an FCD. The stock computer shuts off fuel to the rear rotor at 8.6 lbs of boost, and that's bad. An FCD tricks the computer into keeping the fuel going. That's good.

I personally have the RB turbo back system, and it is incredible.

The 2.5" downpipe will not fit the rest of the system, because the 3.15" downpipe and the presilencer are the same size. It's the first part of the Y-pipe is also 3.15", before it splits into the two 2.5" mufflers. The system is worth every penny. Trust me. And it was much quieter than my stock rusted out exhaust/straight pipe I was using before it. The power is just awesome.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 11:17 AM
  #27  
Fingers's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
so upgrading from the 2.5" to the 3" IS worth the money?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #28  
minclo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Irving, Tx
does the RB turbo back fit the stock turbo??
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 02:02 PM
  #29  
neofreak's Avatar
accept no imitations™
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
From: san francisco
Originally posted by minclo
does the RB turbo back fit the stock turbo??
yes
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 02:08 PM
  #30  
minclo's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Irving, Tx
Originally posted by neofreak
yes
thank you
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 03:47 PM
  #31  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by minclo
wait...what? you had 6 MORE ponies with out the exhaust??
without any exhaust. the dyno is only accurate to +/-5hp too, so i say the rb exhaust is good

mike
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 04:15 PM
  #32  
cagefreak's Avatar
TIMEATK
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley, Ca.
Originally posted by j9fd3s
i dynoed my car with and without the rb turbo back, and it did 214 with and 220 without, the dyno is accurate to +/-5 hp so the rb stuff works.

mike
How many PSI?

And what other mods did you have?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 04:34 PM
  #33  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by cagefreak
How many PSI?

And what other mods did you have?
i think it was at about .6bar, haltech e6k

mike
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2003 | 05:25 PM
  #34  
cagefreak's Avatar
TIMEATK
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Silicon Valley, Ca.
Originally posted by j9fd3s
i think it was at about .6bar, haltech e6k

mike
just the e6k? No fuel mods? Or anything removed. I wanna know your whole set up if you failed to mention other stuff.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 08:13 AM
  #35  
Fingers's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Back from the dead
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #36  
Donn Hecht's Avatar
1 BAD 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Miami,Fla
Im running a Full Racing Beat Exhaust system in my Turbo 2, as far as the exhaust is concerned its "Great" quality, and it sounds sweet. For the money your really getting a "Great" exhaust system thats is strictly designed for the Rotary Engine. In other word its been tested, and dynoed, and proven by R.B. themselves.
Im running the following fuel setup with a motor that has Low Compression at the moment, with 200,000 miles on the clock. Intake, Full R.B. Exhaust System, 550's primaries injectors, Greedy 720's in the secondaries ("Running Way to rich, needs to be tuned down with a S-AFC, on the dyno".) As far as the injectors are concerned you can go with GSL-SE, injectors from a FB (First Gen) RX7, and install those in the secondaries. Those are 680"ccs if im not mistaken. That setup is perfect !!! When your going to do the upgrade, and swap out the injectors wheter it be the primaries, or secondaries, take the time out to have the injectors profesionaly serviced, and cleaned, so you can be assure your injectors are working at there best. Also you must use the R.B. Fuel Cut defense Computer, or you can make a home made Fuel Cut Defense, from radio shack, using there transisters. The transisters will cost you about $5.00/$8.00 bucks, and its the same damn thing R.B. sells the only thing is that they install it in there infamous "Little Black Box", and charge you $90.00 bucks for it. Use the search option on the forum to find information on this matter. Also make sure your Fuel Pump is up to par if not you will be needing a new engine sooner than you think buddy. Check the voltage on your stock pump to make sure its getting the proper voltage necessary so it can do its job, at the same time re-wire the pump to make sure its getting enough electrical current. Even though "I dont practice what I preach" because I have never checked the voltage on my pump in my Turbo 2. Oh well the motor is Low on Comression right now as we speak so it really doesent matter at the moment cause im not boosting the car at the moment just crusing it, saving up money for a rebuild. Also I strongly recomend you use "Bean Oil every time you fill up your car, to keep the Apex Seals, and the housings, and everything well lubricated. I truly believe this is why my engine has lasted as long as it has, because of regular oil changes, and maintenance. Also last thing, control your "Boost", dont let your turbo hit more than 10-11 PSI on the stock turbo, not only are you not making, anymore power "due to the fact that it is way out if its efficiency range", but also you are stressing the oil seals as well.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:18 AM
  #37  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
Knightsports FC605 is quiet.

That is my friggen dream exhaust!!! I even bought it once, but had to settle for the Spec 90 3 1/2" turbo back single LOUD

For those who don't know, the FC605 is full stainless turbo back that splits right off the turbo into dual 3"?downpipes w/ dual presilencers and then where the exhaust pipes "Y" off it has 2 more presilencers and then the nice dual *** cannon mufflers.

Very quiet and very free flowing!

The only limit on exhaust size on turbo cars is boost creep- you know HKS makes a 4" turbo back for our cars!

The larger the exhaust the faster the spool- and a little more power as well.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:30 AM
  #38  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
I heard the RB 59HP claim is based on boost creep as well. So if boost creep is bad, how far can you go?

Just curious. I'm mainly worried on colder nights and seeing boost rise in each higher gear. I've yet to install my RB exhaust but will be porting the wastegate on my S4 turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 12:37 AM
  #39  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,479
Likes: 932
From: CA
Be worried!

My S4 w/ large ported WG, larger WG flapper welded on had uncontrollable boost creep w/ just a RB 2.5" downpipe/presilencer and TID mod....
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 09:49 AM
  #40  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
I'm sure the 58HP gain is compared to a completely stock diameter exhaust with all ancient, clogged cats.

Removing all that ****, and then adding a larger diameter free flowing exhaust, with its added performance benefits may give you 58 bhp.....
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 11:33 AM
  #41  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by eViLRotor
I'm sure the 58HP gain is compared to a completely stock diameter exhaust with all ancient, clogged cats.

Removing all that ****, and then adding a larger diameter free flowing exhaust, with its added performance benefits may give you 58 bhp.....
no its prolly based on new cats on a new car, that exhaust had been around since the t2

mike
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2003 | 02:10 PM
  #42  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally posted by BLUE TII
Be worried!

My S4 w/ large ported WG, larger WG flapper welded on had uncontrollable boost creep w/ just a RB 2.5" downpipe/presilencer and TID mod....
Doh!

Think its time to look for an S5 turbo/manifold.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shainiac
Single Turbo RX-7's
12
Jul 17, 2019 02:20 PM
newtgomez
Introduce yourself
0
Sep 13, 2015 07:39 PM
Ian_D
New Member RX-7 Technical
6
Sep 6, 2015 10:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 AM.