2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

how much rwhp with this s5 TII setup?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 11:57 PM
  #1  
jay3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: california
light mods or new turbo?

im debating whether or not to get an aftermarket turbo. my origional plan is just to go with a apexi intake and a complete apexi n1 exhaust (all the way from dp to catback) on a s5 TII. how much hp do you think my car will get with everything stock except the 2 things mentioned above? if i get a decent gain im probably going to forget the new turbo because i want to run pretty close to stock and not have to deal with the problems.

Last edited by jay3; Aug 3, 2006 at 12:19 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:43 AM
  #2  
JCurry's Avatar
Shpee
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
From: Tx
Well you will have problems if you upgrade the exhaust and intake only...
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 02:31 AM
  #3  
jay3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: california
Originally Posted by RX7Boy06
Well you will have problems if you upgrade the exhaust and intake only...
...explain...?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 02:37 AM
  #4  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
Originally Posted by jay3
...explain...?
no fuel mods and your engine is gonna blow quick. Try getting a Walbro Fuel Pump and some sort of Fuel Controller and maybe 720cc to be safe.

depending on engine and boost, you will probably get 240-260 rwhp.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:11 AM
  #5  
Bunchies's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by Eternal_Gamer
no fuel mods and your engine is gonna blow quick. Try getting a Walbro Fuel Pump and some sort of Fuel Controller and maybe 720cc to be safe.

depending on engine and boost, you will probably get 240-260 rwhp.
im guessing that porting the stock wastegate would be a good idea as well.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:13 AM
  #6  
jay3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: california
what about with a power fc, walbro, and injectors?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:21 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Berthier, Quebec
Originally Posted by jay3
what about with a power fc, walbro, and injectors?
what about the fact that apexi only made power fc compatible with S5 FC. I'd rather look for microtech or haltech if I was you.

Walbro is a must ( or any fuel pump upgrade ) if you're planning on raising radically your hp numbers

I went with 1600CC secondaries. Since you're going standalone anyway, it's gonna be no problem to control them properly

But youre looking for BIG money here

more or less 1200$

l-p
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:40 AM
  #8  
jay3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: california
it is an s5. so power FC, injectors, and walbro and im good to go with the dp, exhaust and intake?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 10:49 AM
  #9  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
Originally Posted by Bunchies
im guessing that porting the stock wastegate would be a good idea as well.
It depends on your situation. My friend gets 9-10 psi with full 3" exhaust. I don't know why other people get 15-18psi. well, i mostly hear about s4's and s4 wastegates are weaker with one hole instead of s5 with two. in this case its an s5.


Originally Posted by jay3
it is an s5. so power FC, injectors, and walbro and im good to go with the dp, exhaust and intake?
yep. make sure u do some good tuning for the added boost. standalone isnt really needed for mildly modified engines, thats how i see it.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 12:58 PM
  #10  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by Eternal_Gamer
yep. make sure u do some good tuning for the added boost. standalone isnt really needed for mildly modified engines, thats how i see it.
Technically speaking, stand-alone is needed on STOCK cars. The 20 year old technology running you engine from the factory, although yes it works, is still very stumbly and coarse. No where near the resolution of a modern EMS like a Haltech. A properly tuned EMS will run a stock car better than the factory ECU. Aside from emissions of course.

Originally Posted by Eternal_Gamer
I don't know why other people get 15-18psi.
You can really only get a spike of boost that high. The stock turbo jut doesn't have the breath to run that much pressure. Plus even that 18psi spike is boiling hot, useless air anyways.

_________________________

The only way to tell what parts you will or will not need is by answering:

How much power do I want?
How much can I afford to spend?
What will I use the car for afterwards?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #11  
calrx7's Avatar
aim** JI II IM IM Y
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: 90703 cerritos california
injectors, fuel pump, upgraded ecu THEN ur car is ready for new turbo yadda yadda yadda
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #12  
brooklynfc3s's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: brooklyn ny
plug the turbo wastegate or get a good boost controller and run the stock turbo as hard as you can untill it blows. Why not have fun with the stock parts? with a good tune you can make 250 rwhp on a stock s5 block.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 02:03 PM
  #13  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by brooklynfc3s
plug the turbo wastegate
WTF??????
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 02:25 PM
  #14  
eage8's Avatar
1308ccs of awesome
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 18
From: Woodbine, MD
you'll have to port your waste gate. I had an intake + 3" exhaust and was running 17 psi

and I would probably recomend against the power FC, you'll have to import a japanesse one, and there isn't much support for then for the 2nd gen. I would probably go with a haltech or microtech, or just a fuel controller like an safc, or an rtek.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #15  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
Originally Posted by classicauto
Technically speaking, stand-alone is needed on STOCK cars. The 20 year old technology running you engine from the factory, although yes it works, is still very stumbly and coarse. No where near the resolution of a modern EMS like a Haltech. A properly tuned EMS will run a stock car better than the factory ECU. Aside from emissions of course.



You can really only get a spike of boost that high. The stock turbo jut doesn't have the breath to run that much pressure. Plus even that 18psi spike is boiling hot, useless air anyways.

_________________________

The only way to tell what parts you will or will not need is by answering:

How much power do I want?
How much can I afford to spend?
What will I use the car for afterwards?

Microtech would make it run better, yes, but its not really necessary to get a good tune off of a mildly modified engine using something like HKS Fcon with HKS GCC or SAFC.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:21 PM
  #16  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by Eternal_Gamer
Microtech would make it run better, yes, but its not really necessary to get a good tune off of a mildly modified engine using something like HKS Fcon with HKS GCC or SAFC.
No its not necessary.....

But have you ever seen wideband readings from car with intake/exhaust 10psi and a "tuned" s-afc? Its all over the board.....lean spots during the secondary transition, then big rich spots when they come online....its "OK" it'll run and it won't blow to bits, but it can run sooooo much better, not to mention probably find more power, with a proper EMS.

And never........never........think its "not necessary" to get a good tune. Especially on a mildly modded engine good tuning will help immensely. I can tell from your comment that you've never had a really bad *** clean tune on your setup, becuase you can tell the difference, its night and day. And if you had one, you would know better
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #17  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
Originally Posted by classicauto
No its not necessary.....

But have you ever seen wideband readings from car with intake/exhaust 10psi and a "tuned" s-afc? Its all over the board.....lean spots during the secondary transition, then big rich spots when they come online....its "OK" it'll run and it won't blow to bits, but it can run sooooo much better, not to mention probably find more power, with a proper EMS.

And never........never........think its "not necessary" to get a good tune. Especially on a mildly modded engine good tuning will help immensely. I can tell from your comment that you've never had a really bad *** clean tune on your setup, becuase you can tell the difference, its night and day. And if you had one, you would know better
Yes, I have never had a standalone system, but i know people with them. And I know it is a much better choice, but not everyone can afford it and not everyone does their own work either. A tuned safc is just fine and wont blow to bits like you said. It might not be to its fullest potential but my point is that its ok to run like that. I'm keeping it as simple as possible for him. Remember this guys said as stock as possible and not so expensive. As for me, when I go big then i will go standalone myself. but right now, im still learning myself, so i will play around with the easy stuff and get really good at it before moving on to standalone. I know you probably have more exp than me with crazy setups, but i am just trying to keep it simple and easy for the topic starter which he asked for.

Last edited by Eternal_Gamer; Aug 3, 2006 at 03:43 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #18  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by Eternal_Gamer
A tuned safc is just fine and wont blow to bits like you said.
Where did I say that?..................


Originally Posted by classicauto
it'll run and it won't blow to bits,
Just for the record
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #19  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
Originally Posted by classicauto
Where did I say that?..................




Just for the record
Actually what i was trying to state was, you were correct about it being able to run and not blow up to bits. and thats what i was getting at, that its ok and good enough. yet its not the full potential of a standalone but it is much easier and simple for the topic starter.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 02:09 AM
  #20  
jay3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: california
so in short, safc is good, but haltech or pfc is even better. i guess im going to go with the standalone, but now i gotta make the decision between pfc and haltech. any suggestions?
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #21  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
Originally Posted by jay3
so in short, safc is good, but haltech or pfc is even better. i guess im going to go with the standalone, but now i gotta make the decision between pfc and haltech. any suggestions?
the safc is good enough. but standalone is better but will cost you $1200 brand new. Microtech or Haltech are the common ones most rx-7 owners use. Apexi Power FC is one I've been hearing about. I've also heard about HKS FCON V PRO but I dont know anyone who uses it.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #22  
dregg100's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: AZ
for your setup an Rtek 1.7 or 2.0 is perfect. also they are plug-n-play. very cost effective. you should deffinately look into one.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #23  
adrock3217's Avatar
Boost in..Apex seals out.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Maryland, 21794
AGGH! EDIT! I just realized, dude, ^^^^^, this is an S5!! RTek doesn't work on S5's, goddamnit!



About the RTek comments...

If you have any plans of ever upgrading from the stock turbo, don't waste your money on an RTek.

I have a 2.0....but, I would never trust it to run my car on any turbo bigger than stock. If I had it to do over again (and I hadn't sold my T2), I would definitely have gone Microtech or Haltech (depending on what Steve Kan likes to tune more )

If you can afford it, absolutely go standalone. The stock ECU is soooo butchered up, with such crappy maps from the factory. A standalone with a proper tune will net insane gains on any setup, with full potential to increase power if the time comes for a bigger turbo.


Don't waste your time on an SAFC or GCC, either go standalone or go home :X
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 02:24 PM
  #24  
Eternal_Gamer's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 1
From: Marysville, CA
Originally Posted by adrock3217
AGGH! EDIT! I just realized, dude, ^^^^^, this is an S5!! RTek doesn't work on S5's, goddamnit!



About the RTek comments...

If you have any plans of ever upgrading from the stock turbo, don't waste your money on an RTek.

I have a 2.0....but, I would never trust it to run my car on any turbo bigger than stock. If I had it to do over again (and I hadn't sold my T2), I would definitely have gone Microtech or Haltech (depending on what Steve Kan likes to tune more )

If you can afford it, absolutely go standalone. The stock ECU is soooo butchered up, with such crappy maps from the factory. A standalone with a proper tune will net insane gains on any setup, with full potential to increase power if the time comes for a bigger turbo.


Don't waste your time on an SAFC or GCC, either go standalone or go home :X

Why not go SAFC or GCC? Just dont buy it new. They are cheap used. Got my HKS PFC F-con in mint condition for $100 shipped and HKS GCC Brand new for $48 shipped (Gotta love Ebay). with this i can run mildy modified at least and be pretty quick compared to stock. The amount I spent on all of my mods are about the same price as a standalone ecu. If I bought a standalone with the money i spent on the other mods, I would still be stock. so my setup is good enough to keep me a little satisfied until i have enough $$$ to go bigger.
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2006 | 02:35 PM
  #25  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by Eternal_Gamer
Why not go SAFC or GCC?
Didn't we just go thrugh this?

Originally Posted by Eternal_Gamer
They are cheap used. Got my HKS PFC F-con in mint condition for $100 shipped and HKS GCC Brand new for $48 shipped (Gotta love Ebay).
$148 is over 25% of the cost of a megasquirt.....Zeal was making PLUG AND PLAY ones.

The ONLY "piggy back" I have used is E-manage and its only because I can control timing with it. Which was entirely necessary on the larger turbo. Face it, even though S-afc is cheap, it will wear out other more expensive componentes faster than a proper (or closer to proper) setup would and in the end is more expensive.

But there's obviously no detturring you from this, your frame of mind is stuck so I won't waste my breathe any more.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.