how much HP can the NA trans really handle?
12-23-03, 05:06 PM
#26
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Bambam7
....put it in first and let out the clutch and the car wouldn't move, just make a nice banging sound. 2,3,4 still worked, sometimes 1st was reverse! Cool! Then it locked up a block later.
Lots of teeth in the drained fluid!....
....put it in first and let out the clutch and the car wouldn't move, just make a nice banging sound. 2,3,4 still worked, sometimes 1st was reverse! Cool! Then it locked up a block later.
Lots of teeth in the drained fluid!....
hahahaha now _THAT_ sounds familiar.. only mine didn't lock up! I just kept loosing gears..
Maybe because I kept changing the oil (in hopes that might somehow stop the breaking...
)
12-23-03, 09:40 PM
#28
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jacobcartmill
so how long should i expect my 160k mile NA tranny to last @ 9-10 psi from a series5 13BT? (if i were to take it easy in first gear)
so how long should i expect my 160k mile NA tranny to last @ 9-10 psi from a series5 13BT? (if i were to take it easy in first gear)
12-23-03, 09:45 PM
#29
Originally posted by White_FC
A long time, indefinatly, if you take it easy and don't make any really rapid applications of torque to it, ie. no hard shifting, launches, stomping on the accelerator at high rpms, stuff like that.
A long time, indefinatly, if you take it easy and don't make any really rapid applications of torque to it, ie. no hard shifting, launches, stomping on the accelerator at high rpms, stuff like that.
i'm planning on having about 250 at the wheels, so it should be fine if i'm easy on it?
12-23-03, 11:05 PM
#34
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm pretty sure someone else has said it before in this thread, but ima gonna say it again since people are still talking about HP... It's torque, and specifically the rapid application of it that will kill a transmition, turbo motors generate *** loads more torque than N/A motors...
12-24-03, 12:19 AM
#36
I don't thing the N/A tranny could take 250 tq to the wheels. It would snap. 250 at the flywheel would probably kill it.
Its easy to say you will take it easy on the tranny when you don't have a turbo on the car. It's much different when you get addicted to the boost.
The TII tranny can take 500+
Its easy to say you will take it easy on the tranny when you don't have a turbo on the car. It's much different when you get addicted to the boost.
The TII tranny can take 500+
12-24-03, 01:40 AM
#37
Originally posted by 13bpower
I don't thing the N/A tranny could take 250 tq to the wheels. It would snap. 250 at the flywheel would probably kill it.
Its easy to say you will take it easy on the tranny when you don't have a turbo on the car. It's much different when you get addicted to the boost.
The TII tranny can take 500+
I don't thing the N/A tranny could take 250 tq to the wheels. It would snap. 250 at the flywheel would probably kill it.
Its easy to say you will take it easy on the tranny when you don't have a turbo on the car. It's much different when you get addicted to the boost.
The TII tranny can take 500+
i'm just gonna try to make it for about a month... i'm sure there's someone on this forum that has run an NA trans with turboII torque for a month...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
