Hardened stationary gears
#1
Hot Dicken's Cider
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, Ohio
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hardened stationary gears
Im building my motor now, and I want to be be able to rev to 8500 if the power is still there. I know the S5 gears are not hardened, but Ive read that the FD gears are. Are the FD and FC gears interchangable? I figure the S5 T2s 7k redline is there for a reason, so I want to upgrade. Mazdatrix wants 160 apeice for FC gears, but over 300 for FD's.
#2
Sharp Claws
iTrader: (30)
i thought the redline was more to keep the apex seal from getting tossed out the exhaust port than for breaking the stationary gear but i don't know of many people who rev past that point daily so i couldn't specify just that i hear of apex seals tossed alot more than stationary gear problems.
#5
Lives on the Forum
Kouki FC turbo stat gears are hardened.
If you going to change over to FD stat gears, you need to change out all the crap in the front, cause the design is different - you need at least the FD spacer, pair 'o thrust bearings, and some other small bits.
Unless you spinning way up high or running over 400hp, getting hardened stat gears is a waste of money.
I don't think you're making power up to 8,500RPM unless you're running a big port engine?
This basically means you need a BP or larger.
I don't understand why people want to rev the engines so high?
Is this a bragging thing?
-Ted
If you going to change over to FD stat gears, you need to change out all the crap in the front, cause the design is different - you need at least the FD spacer, pair 'o thrust bearings, and some other small bits.
Unless you spinning way up high or running over 400hp, getting hardened stat gears is a waste of money.
I don't think you're making power up to 8,500RPM unless you're running a big port engine?
This basically means you need a BP or larger.
I don't understand why people want to rev the engines so high?
Is this a bragging thing?
-Ted
Trending Topics
#9
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by drago86
S5 NA stat gears are hardend,.. infact all gears from 89 up are.
All S5 stat gears are ion-nitrided.
The Kouki turbo rotor gears are ion-nitrided also; the Kouki NA rotor gears are not.
http://www.thecarricos.com/ACRE/New-tech90-7-12.pdf
-Ted
#10
The mystery of the prize.
Originally Posted by RETed
Kouki FC turbo stat gears are hardened.
If you going to change over to FD stat gears, you need to change out all the crap in the front, cause the design is different - you need at least the FD spacer, pair 'o thrust bearings, and some other small bits.
Unless you spinning way up high or running over 400hp, getting hardened stat gears is a waste of money.
I don't think you're making power up to 8,500RPM unless you're running a big port engine?
This basically means you need a BP or larger.
I don't understand why people want to rev the engines so high?
Is this a bragging thing?
-Ted
If you going to change over to FD stat gears, you need to change out all the crap in the front, cause the design is different - you need at least the FD spacer, pair 'o thrust bearings, and some other small bits.
Unless you spinning way up high or running over 400hp, getting hardened stat gears is a waste of money.
I don't think you're making power up to 8,500RPM unless you're running a big port engine?
This basically means you need a BP or larger.
I don't understand why people want to rev the engines so high?
Is this a bragging thing?
-Ted
http://kahren.net/cars/2/DSC00047.JPG
That dyno is from a somewhat radical, but STOCK PORT NA - this shows you even the tiny stock NA ports can flow well enough for a 6500-7000RPM torque peak. I'm pretty surprised by this actually, considering my thumb barely fits in the NA primary intake port
I tend to shift @ 8500 on my street port NA, it's still making GREAT power and I look forward to dragging it out longer in the future. I have not dyno'd yet but judging by the fuel map the torque peak is around 7000-8000 rpm. I have my rev limit set to 8600 and occasionally hit it on accident especially in 1st, after I get a scatter shield installed I will likely raise the limit to over 9. My setup is simlar to what put down the numbers in the dyno graph, cept mine is ported and some other details like hardened rb stat gears etc.
Revving that high, for my setup at least, results in more torque @ the rear wheels at that road speed than there would be in the next gear up, it also lands the motor closer to the torque peak when I finally shift to the next gear, usually anyways. If you're even just street ported and have done other supporting mods appropriately, 9k is reasonable IMHO.
115mph in 3rd is good times. ~150 in 4th, vrewm. 1st is too short and 2nd too tall on the NA box though, 5th is pointless. I can't tell you how many races I've been even with someone through 3rd til around 7000rpm, then pull on them til rev limit while they shift and suddenly lost a significant fraction of their rear wheel torque after the shift.
You just have to make the engine breathe up high, lose the stock intake manifolds and go speed/density, open up the exhaust, and as long as you replace the intake manifolds with something that flows really well it will work nicely, at the very least at high rpm.
#11
Hot Dicken's Cider
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, Ohio
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im going with a large street port(a VERY large SP, from what Ive seen on other motors), and hoping to put down over 400. Its just that all the dyno sheets Ive seen with similar mods the power just keeps climbing past 7k, 8k, etc...
#12
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by pengarufoo
I disagree here Ted.
http://kahren.net/cars/2/DSC00047.JPG
That dyno is from a somewhat radical, but STOCK PORT NA - this shows you even the tiny stock NA ports can flow well enough for a 6500-7000RPM torque peak. I'm pretty surprised by this actually, considering my thumb barely fits in the NA primary intake port
http://kahren.net/cars/2/DSC00047.JPG
That dyno is from a somewhat radical, but STOCK PORT NA - this shows you even the tiny stock NA ports can flow well enough for a 6500-7000RPM torque peak. I'm pretty surprised by this actually, considering my thumb barely fits in the NA primary intake port
Most of the NA dynp graphs I've seen "lose steam" at around 7,500RPM.
If you want to wind it up there all the time, you're degrading longevity to be able to run up that high?
That's something you, as an owner, need to make a decision on...
-Ted
#13
Fabricator and builder
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Innisfil, Ontario
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One reason for the rev limiter is because when you start getting up around 8500 plus you're ecc. shaft starts to flex and the sides of the rotors start to contact the intermediate housings. At least that's what I've read.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MILOS7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
10-09-15 02:19 AM