This goes for ***** & ****.*** (NO user names in the topic!)
Naw... no way thats from a V8- it spikes up too much... if it was from a highly tuned V8, with all it's power in the higher end, it would have much more power at the top end than that.
Given the low amount of power down low, it's definately not from a tourque-built one either. The tourque would be much higher at the low end , and would be a lot flatter across compared to the HP.
Looks to me like a turbocharged 4 banger. Still should have been pulled longer though.
Given the low amount of power down low, it's definately not from a tourque-built one either. The tourque would be much higher at the low end , and would be a lot flatter across compared to the HP.
Looks to me like a turbocharged 4 banger. Still should have been pulled longer though.
HEY DRUNKEN MASTER!
Is yours the white 86 that was converted to a TII with a striaon front mount ic?
Im in Bako too, do you ever come out to sonic? If so i would love to check out your car.
Where did you get the car dyno'd?
Theres only 3 chassis dynos in 100mile raduis, and 2 of them JUST opened up.
Didi you get it done out a sevens only?
Is yours the white 86 that was converted to a TII with a striaon front mount ic?
Im in Bako too, do you ever come out to sonic? If so i would love to check out your car.
Where did you get the car dyno'd?
Theres only 3 chassis dynos in 100mile raduis, and 2 of them JUST opened up.
Didi you get it done out a sevens only?
Rotary Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, Texas, USA, Earth, Solar System...
Re: This goes for RETED & FC3S.ORG
Originally posted by DrunkenMaster
well, this is what u guys wrote along time ago , it has been buggin me since
RETED:
Stock ECU....bridgeport...4psi...what kind of turbo???
What kinda dyno did you run on?
Two hundred and five horsepower?
Two hundred and seventy five pound/feet of torque?
Were you running NOS on the dyno on this run?
Are you running some kinda piston motor?
Got proof with a dyno print-out?
I find these numbers on the borderline of bullshit...
-Ted
FC3S.ORG:
Got that dyno sheet?
its right here boys.... sorry for the long post...
well, this is what u guys wrote along time ago , it has been buggin me since
RETED:
Stock ECU....bridgeport...4psi...what kind of turbo???
What kinda dyno did you run on?
Two hundred and five horsepower?
Two hundred and seventy five pound/feet of torque?
Were you running NOS on the dyno on this run?
Are you running some kinda piston motor?
Got proof with a dyno print-out?
I find these numbers on the borderline of bullshit...
-Ted
FC3S.ORG:
Got that dyno sheet?
its right here boys.... sorry for the long post...
Brad
Hehehe this is hilarious! To be honest, the only thing I can think of that would have that kind of power drop at 4000rpm is a Land Cruiser 3.6L Deisel engine! (Maybe with a turbo it could push that power, who knows.)
But even a 4 banger with turbo (240sx engine lets say) would not match that, because doesnt the turbo just start to kick in around 3000rpm? So it has very little time to make boost...cause 270 tq is alot for an turbo 4 banger.
This is insane though...that dyno looks like it should be for a deisel truck of some sort....maybe a Dodge Ram V-10 Cummins Turbo Deisel!?
Peace
Nima
But even a 4 banger with turbo (240sx engine lets say) would not match that, because doesnt the turbo just start to kick in around 3000rpm? So it has very little time to make boost...cause 270 tq is alot for an turbo 4 banger.
This is insane though...that dyno looks like it should be for a deisel truck of some sort....maybe a Dodge Ram V-10 Cummins Turbo Deisel!?
Peace
Nima
I still don't know what egine that should be...
it's definatly not a big truck deisel or any big V8- since it would have WAY more torque in the 1500 rpm range... and while HP may rise up like that, the torque would stay pretty much flat.....
Ya know.. it LOOKS almost like the first half of a rotary engine graph.. but definatly NOT a bridgeport... too much power at 2000....
I say someone in that area CONTACT that dyno shop, and see if they can help!!!
it's definatly not a big truck deisel or any big V8- since it would have WAY more torque in the 1500 rpm range... and while HP may rise up like that, the torque would stay pretty much flat.....
Ya know.. it LOOKS almost like the first half of a rotary engine graph.. but definatly NOT a bridgeport... too much power at 2000....
I say someone in that area CONTACT that dyno shop, and see if they can help!!!
Last edited by Bambam7; May 15, 2002 at 10:16 PM.
Full Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Hey guys, I just got my 86 N/A dynoed today. Man those K&N filters sure do add the horse power!
http://www.fastmotorsports.com/406graph.htm
http://www.fastmotorsports.com/406graph.htm
It looks very similar to one I saw from a buddy's 240sx. It was N/A but had an intake and exhaust. Just bolt-on mods, nothing internal. The 2.4 Nissan motor was originally built for the trucks so it had decent torque (I can't remember exactly how much) and it redlined somewhere around 4000-5000 R's. It also has a built-in over-rev controller that cuts back the fuel. (hence the multiple spikes we see between 3600-3900) This would tend to be the most logical engine I can think of to match those numbers. I have to say with almost certainty, it is not from a turbo due to the nearly straight upside. A turbo (at least the ones I have seen) have a gradual slope at the bottom and then turn very steep when the turbo gets spooled and produces boost. With the stock turbo in my T2, the bottom end sucks *** and you really only feel the "thrown back in the seats" power above 2500-3000 R's. I thought that a bridge port reduced even further the amount of bottom end. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the T2 come stock rated at 200hp? If the turbo was run only to 4psi before fuel cut off, you would also see many other bobbles (for lack of a better word)on the way up. There is no way a 13B (even BP and turbo) could pull that much torque and hp without boosting higher than 4psi. My T2 can hit fuel cut at around 3000 rpm if I really get into it from a slow start or an early shift. I'm sure you would see the fuel cut on this one much lower along the initial slope. I'm with everyone else:
btw: Why has DrunkenMaster not come back to defend himself? Did he just give up after that little bit of time? I guess he knows that he got BUSTED!!!!!
btw: Why has DrunkenMaster not come back to defend himself? Did he just give up after that little bit of time? I guess he knows that he got BUSTED!!!!!
Originally posted by Ziggy682
Hey guys, I just got my 86 N/A dynoed today. Man those K&N filters sure do add the horse power!
http://www.fastmotorsports.com/406graph.htm
Hey guys, I just got my 86 N/A dynoed today. Man those K&N filters sure do add the horse power!
http://www.fastmotorsports.com/406graph.htm
Really though, the only way I could get a dyno sheet like that on my car, would be to tape it to the sunroof!
hmmmmmm
Its quite possible to come from a 240 the only thing that gets me is that it stops at 4000, i have a friend that has a 91 twin cam and it doesnt redline till 6800, and thats pushin it.it was and is a torquey motor though. maybe its a single cam ka from 89-90 though. its not a rotory though.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: WEST
This **** is getting funnier and funnier. Damn drunkenmaster...I've NEVER seen anyone get this badly ragged on. If you were going to lie...at least be smart about it. Obviously you have never been to a dyno OR never seen a rotary dynoed. I would say he has officially changed his name so we will NEVER know who he is. For all we know, he could be ragging on himself!
Whoever did the superimposing on the dyno, I almost choked laughing so hard.
Whoever did the superimposing on the dyno, I almost choked laughing so hard.





