2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Fuel required: hybrd vs stock (myth or reality?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-07, 09:13 PM
  #1  
Drive.

Thread Starter
 
X-JaVeN-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, North Carolina
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Fuel required: hybrd vs stock (myth or reality?)

Hey, I'm trying to clear up some information. I've heard both true and false, so I don't know which is right. Does "X" amount of boost on a stock s5 turbo require the same amount of fuel as a larger hybrid (say a bnr stage 3 or 4) @ the same boost level? Essentially, does 10psi of boost on a hybrid require more fuel than 10psi on a stock turbo? If it does require more fuel....why? As I've said, I've heard both yes and no...so which is right?
Old 06-21-07, 09:41 PM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Boost does not necessarily mean more power.
That's a general rule.

But, since we're talking about almost identical set-up's with the exception of the compression section...yes, the hybrid should make more power at the same amount of boost.


-Ted
Old 06-21-07, 09:46 PM
  #3  
Drive.

Thread Starter
 
X-JaVeN-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, North Carolina
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
but is it using the same amount of fuel or does it require more?

let me try wording a different way....assuming I'm running an s5 turbo @ 10lbs and I'm getting afr's @ 11.5 @ 6000rpm....then I change only the turbo out to a large hybrid and run it at 10 lbs...would my afr's be any leaner? Would I need to add more fuel even tho I'm still running the same amount of boost?
Old 06-21-07, 09:57 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Large compressor side implies more airflow at any given boost over a smaller compressor side.

So, yes, it will require more fuel to keep AFR's safe.


-Ted
Old 06-21-07, 10:02 PM
  #5  
rx-for-my-7

iTrader: (1)
 
NJGreenBudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,206
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
it's like the difference between pressure and volume right? there will be more airflow(volume) through a larger pipe at the same boost (pressure) than through a smaller pipe.
i think....im thinking about anatomy and physiology here, blood vessel dynamics....
Old 06-21-07, 10:09 PM
  #6  
Drive.

Thread Starter
 
X-JaVeN-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, North Carolina
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RETed
Large compressor side implies more airflow at any given boost over a smaller compressor side.

So, yes, it will require more fuel to keep AFR's safe.


-Ted

makes sense now...thanks!
Old 06-21-07, 10:49 PM
  #7  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
Large compressor side implies more airflow at any given boost over a smaller compressor side.
That is assuming the turbo with the larger compressor increases the volumetric efficiency and/or decreases the air temperature vs. the smaller turbo. While this is usually the case, I just want to point out that sometimes it doesn't work out this way, so the answer to the poster's question is not an absolute.

Originally Posted by X-JaVeN-X
Would I need to add more fuel even tho I'm still running the same amount of boost?
Hopefully.

Originally Posted by NJGreenBudd
it's like the difference between pressure and volume right? there will be more airflow(volume) through a larger pipe at the same boost (pressure) than through a smaller pipe.
It's more about density and efficiency. In this situation, pressure is a constant as stated by the original poster.
Old 06-22-07, 12:11 AM
  #8  
Boost in..Apex seals out.

 
adrock3217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Maryland, 21794
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
That is assuming the turbo with the larger compressor increases the volumetric efficiency and/or decreases the air temperature vs. the smaller turbo. While this is usually the case, I just want to point out that sometimes it doesn't work out this way, so the answer to the poster's question is not an absolute.

Well, no, the answer to this particular poster's question IS an absolute. The BNR stage 1-4 turbos will increase volumetric efficiency, because it WILL flow more CFM at a static boost level than the stock turbo.

So yes, it WILL need more fuel =O
Old 06-22-07, 09:27 AM
  #9  
destroy, rebuild, repeat

iTrader: (1)
 
gxl90rx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,990
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
Large compressor side implies more airflow at any given boost over a smaller compressor side.
i still have trouble wrapping my head around this.. from my understanding, different turbos can have different airflow at a fixed boost pressure, but only due to differences in intake temps and exhaust turbine backpressure

meaning, if the exhasut side was the same, and boost pressure fixed, a bigger compressor will flow the same or less, due to the higher drag of the bigger compressor

however most hybrids have clipped or modified exhaust sides, which lowers backpressure, which causes more airflow (power) at a given boost pressure
Old 06-22-07, 10:15 AM
  #10  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by gxl90rx7
however most hybrids have clipped or modified exhaust sides,
Bad assumption...


-Ted
Old 06-22-07, 03:08 PM
  #11  
Boost in..Apex seals out.

 
adrock3217's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Maryland, 21794
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
Bad assumption...


-Ted


Indeed. A lot of hybrids just have a larger compressor side mated to the stock exhaust side.
Old 06-22-07, 03:15 PM
  #12  
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.

iTrader: (3)
 
classicauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hagersville Ontario
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by X-JaVeN-X
Hey, I'm trying to clear up some information. I've heard both true and false, so I don't know which is right. Does "X" amount of boost on a stock s5 turbo require the same amount of fuel as a larger hybrid (say a bnr stage 3 or 4) @ the same boost level? Essentially, does 10psi of boost on a hybrid require more fuel than 10psi on a stock turbo? If it does require more fuel....why? As I've said, I've heard both yes and no...so which is right?
Look at it from a horsepwoer standpoint. Forget pressure, compressor size and the rest.

The hybrid turbo (should, and for this example lets say will) make more hosrepower. To make more power then before you need two things. More air. And more fuel. The two together equal a more explosive combustion, which results in more work performed on the eccentric shaft, which means more smiles on your face.

Kapeesh?
Old 06-22-07, 11:34 PM
  #13  
Drive.

Thread Starter
 
X-JaVeN-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, North Carolina
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
definitely has more power....6lbs on this hybrid feels like 10-12 on the stock s5 that was on it before.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
07-01-23 04:40 PM
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
09-02-18 09:53 AM



Quick Reply: Fuel required: hybrd vs stock (myth or reality?)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.