2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Fresh rebuild: 120psi front, 92psi rear after 500 miles... Suggestions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 03:58 AM
  #1  
importedboi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way
Fresh rebuild: 120psi front, 92psi rear after 500 miles... Suggestions?

Okay i just put 500miles on my motor, and did a compression check, and the front came out 120psi, and the rear came out 92 psi. When i pulled my spark plugs they did have a little dirt and depris on them. Im havent changed the oil yet but i am very soon. Right after the rebuild both rotors had 88psi.

The parts i used were atkins rotary apex seals, solid corners, all new springs, new oil rings, basically everything brand new, etc. The irons and housings were used and seemed in fair condition.

I just wanted some suggestion on what the problem could be? I didnt really throughly clean my engine rotors that well, and could some dirt and other crap not make my side seals, and apex seals spring up corretly enough?

The car does run great, but has a rough start sometimes when it is at operating temepertures, but it has gotten better over time with the gaining mileage. Overall it drives well.

I let it break in slowly, meaning i tried to keep it under 3000 rpm during those 500miles. Currently the car has about 550miles. Should i drive it up to 1000miles and check it again?

-Thanks

Last edited by importedboi; Sep 10, 2006 at 04:06 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #2  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Give it a little more time...People are so obsessed with compression numbers. As long as the engine starts, makes good power and runs well, who cares what the compression is?

Now, it could be a number of things. If you are using a normal compression gauge you are only measuring average compression of that rotor. So you may have a worn housing, improperly clearanced seal, etc.

That's a large compression difference that indicates something is up with the bad rotor. It is important to get the rotors clean but as long as the seals move in their grooves, they are clean enough. Beat on it a little and see what happens.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #3  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
I agree with Aaron. Stay out of boost, but start increasing the RPM's to around 4-4.5k.

Are you measuring each pulse on the compression test, or just getting MAX pressure readings? Either way, get that oil changed and put some more miles on it.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #4  
NeCr0mStR's Avatar
I just wanna hump my car.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 841
Likes: 1
From: Lansing area Michigan
I don't mean to thread jack, but I have a new rebuild I installed this summer and wonder what kind of break in period I should be using.

Atkins told me 500 miles below 3500rpm's and then add 500 per week till I get to redline. Is this a little excessive or do you think this is a safe route. Its a stage 2 street port if that matters.

Last edited by NeCr0mStR; Sep 10, 2006 at 03:24 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 03:28 PM
  #5  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by NeCr0mStR
I don't mean to thread jack, but I have a new rebuild I installed this summer and wonder what kind of break in period I should be using.

Atkins told me 500 miles below 3500rpm's and then add 500 per week till I get to redline. Is this a little excessive or do you think this is a safe route. Its a stage 2 street port if that matters.

that is a rather strange schedule to follow, yes. beats the people who tell you to baby the hell out of the motor for 3K+ miles though..
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #6  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Sounds to me like you used a really nice housing up front and a lesser housing in the back. IF that is the issue, the difference will never really be made up. The strong front rotor should always be enough to keep it going pretty well, though, so I wouldnt worry about it unless it gets worse.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsmith94FD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Aug 16, 2015 05:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.