2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

forged rotors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 09:11 PM
  #26  
Twofer's Avatar
I am the stig.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 614
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
http://www.vetteweb.com/tech/0407vet...l_information/

Guess so. They mentioned the test was on an Inerta dyno, which I'm not familiar with.

Next, the stock pressure plate, clutch, and flywheel were removed and weighed. The three factory parts hit the scale at 51 pounds. The new Fidanza 12.5-pound aluminum flywheel (PN 198571, retails at $439.00), and the 14.5-pound Spec Stage 1 clutch/pressure plate unit (PN SC091, retails at $299.00) totaled 27 pounds--a savings of 24 pounds of rotating weight at the crankshaft!

...a gain of 9.3 hp and 8.6 ft-lb of torque. Maximum horsepower was achieved in 11 vs. 14 seconds with the stock parts, and maximum torque was seen in 9 vs. 11 seconds with the stock parts! Back on the road, Denny's Z06 revved a little quicker and required a lighter push on the loud pedal. We could feel the difference.

...A flywheel does not make any horsepower, but it shows up as a horsepower gain because you have reduced the inertia on an inertia dyno. So you need to look at the reduction in time to speed that was created by the reduction of inertia. We went from 14 to 11 seconds to 145 mph on the stock Z06. What that tells you is how the car is going to feel on the street. It is going to accelerate quicker to the redline.
11 seconds to 145mph. I wish my car could go 145mph. ****.

I've heard the same thing about rims, "a pound on the rims is like 50 on the car".

Additionally:
http://www.se-r.net/engine/light_flywheels.html

Last edited by Twofer; Oct 25, 2006 at 09:18 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #27  
anewconvert's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by Twofer
Well it all comes back to what "power" and "displacement" mean.

Horsepower is really a fictional number based on Torque and RPM....

(Torque x Engine speed) / 5,252 = Horsepower

High revving engines will have lots of "power". RX-7 and S2000 are good examples. High revs, high power, low torque.

An example of a low power, high torque engine would be a diesel truck. Some redline at 3k but have upwards of 800 lb/ft of torque. It'll pull anything out of anywhere, but it's not really fast.

It also has to do with the weight of a car... so power to weight ratio.... anyway.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/horsepower.htm
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question622.htm

On the topic of Displacement, it's measured differently for piston engines and rotary engines.

Piston engines rate the displacement by the maximum cylinder volume of all the cylinders. Rotary engines rate displacement literally. Rotor housing volume minus rotor volume. The difference comes up in racing classes, where they go by the "Double Displacement" rule... 1.3L rotary comprable to 2.6L piston.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question685.htm

On the issue of forced induction, the short of it is: More air, more fuel, more power, more stress on engine.

Could a 1.3L Rotary make as much "power" as a 7.3L truck? Sure, if the tuck only rev'ed to 1000 rpm.

The rotary engine isn't magical, it's just shaped wierd.
Just to clarify. HP isnt a "fictional number." Its a measurement that is arrived at mathmatically. It measures work accomplished over time.

Torque is, IIRC, work done at the moment.


BC
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 11:46 PM
  #28  
Twofer's Avatar
I am the stig.
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 614
Likes: 3
From: San Diego, CA
For the purposes of automotive comparison, it's a relative measure. An approximation of what kind of performance you are going to get. It's something to brag about.

If I told you a vehicle had 100 hp, could you tell me how fast it could do a quarter mile? What if it was a 1.6 liter Civic, or a 650cc Sport Bike, or a turbine powered go-kart?

Now if we had the same car, with a 100 hp engine, and a 200 hp engine, we know the 200 hp engine would be faster, but still no exact time.

So back to the original point, horsepower is indeed a real number, it just doesn't mean much. Read any discussion about turbo sizes and there will be discussions about "usable power" versus "peak power". Terms like "properly sized turbo" and "dyno queen" come up frequently.

It's a number for the marketing guys to put on the brochure. Just like audio amplifiers that claim they're good for 1000000 watts. The real number to look for is RMS watts @ <= 1% THD.

If anyone was wondering, I was bored at work today.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 11:59 PM
  #29  
DREYKO's Avatar
I "lost" my emissions....
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 6
From: lillington, nc
perhaps he means brake rotors?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #30  
Black91n/a's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,707
Likes: 6
From: BC, Canada
Brake rotors are cast iron, I don't know of any forged ones, but iron isn't usually (or ever) forged AFIK. There are steel rotors, but iron works better for most intents and purposes, because it's harder and resists abrasion better.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 01:28 AM
  #31  
bluesi's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: CA
I had a lighten flywheel in my b16. I rev up very quickly, the car becomes very responsive, but on the same note, it revs down just as quickly too. My friends who are not used to driving it always stall the car and hate driving it.

It also makes engine braking almost non existent since there's alot less momentum. I can only imagine that it'll be the same with a rotary rotor; most likely more noticiable since its closer to the energy generating source.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 02:17 AM
  #32  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Whatever the case, you're looking at a brand new design of the rotors.
Problem with forged components is that their heat expansion rates are different than cast items.
With the close tolerances of the rotor and rotor parts, I'd worry about tolerances.
All these forged piston owners bitch about "piston slap" until the engine warms up...


-Ted
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 02:28 AM
  #33  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
This is funny ****. It reminds me of one of the first local 7 owners I met when I got into 7s myself back in 99. IT was this young dumbass redneck kid who thought his s4 NA base model was the fastest **** on wheels. He had dual 3" straightpipes, and painted it bathroom aqua green with no clearcoat, "RE" written on the fenders (he said it stood for rotary engine, my girlfriend at the time said it stood for retard), and little purple "rotors" stenciled on it in random places all over the car.

Anyway this dude swore his car had titanium rotors and that is why it was so fast. HE also claimed to have went 170mph on the interstate even though the speedo in his car stopped at 150 and he had tires 3 sizes too small for the car. I just kinda shrugged it off and went on with life, though I did make fun of him from time to time.

Sounds a little bit like what we are dealing with here.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 02:30 AM
  #34  
Qhasan31's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
Damn I'm learning chemisty and physics at the same time! haha! This is genius! haha! Who needs school! haha! j/p

I really didn't think that this would be such a hot topic! I was just wondering! haha!

Hasan
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #35  
bryson's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by Twofer
For the purposes of automotive comparison, it's a relative measure. An approximation of what kind of performance you are going to get. It's something to brag about.

If I told you a vehicle had 100 hp, could you tell me how fast it could do a quarter mile? What if it was a 1.6 liter Civic, or a 650cc Sport Bike, or a turbine powered go-kart?

Now if we had the same car, with a 100 hp engine, and a 200 hp engine, we know the 200 hp engine would be faster, but still no exact time.

So back to the original point, horsepower is indeed a real number, it just doesn't mean much. Read any discussion about turbo sizes and there will be discussions about "usable power" versus "peak power". Terms like "properly sized turbo" and "dyno queen" come up frequently.

It's a number for the marketing guys to put on the brochure. Just like audio amplifiers that claim they're good for 1000000 watts. The real number to look for is RMS watts @ <= 1% THD.

If anyone was wondering, I was bored at work today.


Horsepower is a very helpful number. Moreso, in fact, than torque, since cars have a transmission (which multiplies the torque). Horsepower is a good indication of how you can take advantage of your gearing to produce more torque at the wheels (actual torque at the wheels, not engine torque measured at the wheels). A dyno measures wheel torque and engine RPM. Then, it uses wheel RPM and engine RPM to establish the gearing and applies that ratio to the measured torque at the wheels, which is usually higher than the torque at the engine. If two cars make 200 ft*lbs of torque at two different RPM, the one with the torque at a higher RPM will accelerate faster because the car can be geared lower (increasing the torque to the wheels) for the same speed.


For the car to maintain the same speed in first and second gear, the engine would have to be at a lower RPM in second, right? For example, if 8000rpm in first gear is 40mph, and second gear gives you 40mph at 4000rpm, then it would take twice the engine torque to accelerate the car in second gear at the same rate. So, imagine you have an engine that makes 200ft*lbs at 4000rpm (152hp) and an engine that makes 200ft*lbs at 8000rpm (305hp). The first car has a drivetrain producing a 1:1 ratio between engine speed and wheel speed, while the second car is a 2:1 ratio. For both cars to maintain the same velocity, the engine speed of car 2 must be twice that of car 1. So, car1 is at 4000rpm making 200ft*lbs, and car2 is at 8000rpm making 200ft*lbs. They are going the same speed. If both punch the gas, car 2 will accelerate much faster, because it's 200ft*lbs at the engine is now 400ft*lbs at the wheels due to the gear ratio. Coincidentally, that car has twice the horsepower.

That's why horsepower is actually a better indication of a car's ability to accelerate than torque. In a car with only one gear, torque would be the deciding factor. Since automobile manufacturers have the ability to choose gears to suit a car's powerband, horsepower is the deciding factor as to a car's speed. It takes into account engine torque AND the torque-multiplying effect of a car's gearing.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #36  
rx7jocke's Avatar
3-Rotor madness
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 1
From: sweden
Titanium!

titanium rotors....would be damn light!!
Is it possible?
Anyone tried?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2006 | 11:51 AM
  #37  
Sideways7's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 10
From: Temple, Texas (Central)
Titanium rotors, even if possible, would be ungodly expensive. The only street car I've ever seen with titanium anything was one of Bob Norwood's Testarossas, and it had close to $150,000 put into the engine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jase03
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
26
Sep 29, 2015 10:36 AM
stickmantijuana
20B Forum
9
Sep 22, 2015 07:39 PM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 PM.