2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Flywheel HELP NEEDED!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #26  
Frankencar1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hazard15301
They are ******* stupid asses. As has already been stated, turbos use a larger flywheel, and therefore a larger bell housing. Stop dealing with whatever company that is because they are talking out there asses.
This turned out to be true. I learned the hard way (and with research post-fact) that the bell housing was modified slightly for the TII in the 86 models, though the bolt pattern is the same. So my adapter plate works, but the Turbo flywheel is about 1/2" too wide in diameter.

I cannot emphasize how incredibly infuriated I was to discover this. The electric motor looks so gorgeous with all the parts bolted in place! I was so excited, and so close to having my motor mounted! I have everything I need except the proper flywheel (because I still have the n/a clutch disc and pressure plate I ordered originally from exedy).

The only thing I don't have is a desire to deal with these people for one more second. So if anyone wants to purchase an ACT flywheel for a TII RX7, or a really nice looking pressure plate for the same, or has a nice lightweight flywheel for my n/a, please PM me.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #27  
jjcobm's Avatar
Are you experienced?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 2
From: Illinois
Post this up on the 2nd gen classifieds. I am sure it will get snatched up soon.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2010 | 04:16 PM
  #28  
TheAbsence's Avatar
s4 Pride
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 3
From: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Originally Posted by jjcobm
Post this up on the 2nd gen classifieds. I am sure it will get snatched up soon.
https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-rx-7-1986-1992-parts-194/
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2010 | 10:38 AM
  #29  
Frankencar1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Will do.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2010 | 11:26 PM
  #30  
Pattsy's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Removing the ring gear on the turbo flywheel may give you enough clearance to use it with your NA transmission. No starter needed = no ring gear needed.

If not you can have the flywheel turned down by a machine shop as well. Or determine where in your transmission it is tight and cut/grind some clearance.

Swapping my NA tranny to a TII, the only difference I recall in this regard is the removable inspection plate on the bottom of the bell housing that was cleared for the increased diameter of the TII flywheel.

If it were me I would ditch the transmission altogether and run a torque tube to the differential. But I don't know all the facts about your motor and such...

Pat
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #31  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Unless it is an AC system, the transmission should be retained. DC motors draw huge currents when direct driving.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 09:03 AM
  #32  
Frankencar1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
So close now!!

Okay, I know this is an older thread, but I thought I would follow up, if only for the sake of closing out the discussion. So here's what happened, first-hand, no theories here.

1. The turbo flywheel is about 1/8-14" too large for the NA bell housing, though the bolt pattern is the same. This has nothing to do with a starter/no starter, it is just too large. I have acquired a non-turbo flywheel that (I think) is from Racing Beat. Luckily, I found someone on craigslist who was willing to trade straight across for the turbo flywheel, so that worked out nicely.

2. This meant that I also had to go back to the NA clutch disc and pressure plate, which I already had, so that works out okay too.

3. Finally, after some install hardships, I discovered one more difference between the two transmissions - the splined shaft is inset deeper from the motor side in the NA than in the Turbo II. Again, I discovered this first hand, as the clutch disc was not contacting the splines during installation. I found the right measurements on another thread on this forum, verified them by measuring the splined shaft, and now the only issue I have is that all that torque is slipping the clutch, and I just need to play with my flywheel/clutch cover spacers (When initially installing the pressure plate with no spacers, it clamped down so far on the clutch disc that there was no room left for it to release when the clutch is depressed, so I just need to balance how firmly it grips the disc with the spacing).
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 09:37 AM
  #33  
oinesra's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 287
Likes: 3
From: Orange Park, FL
Do you have a build thread of this any where?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 10:34 AM
  #34  
Frankencar1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
http://www.diyelectriccar.com/forums...652#post236652

and

http://www.frankencar.org
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rx7jocke
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 15, 2015 03:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.