2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

The fastest streetable NA setup...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 02:22 AM
  #26  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally posted by CanadianRX7
yea obviously but the car will be faster none the less
Yeah, you're correct, but we're arguing about horsepower figures, which really has nothing to do (technically) with our discussion.



-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 02:24 AM
  #27  
rx7passion's Avatar
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Az
wow nice reted, not to be a complete internet *** but he is definitly not afraid to speak the truth....

now what if i add a performance sticker?
15hp? (unsure on exact outputs on this mod)

hehe j/k no flames please
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 02:25 AM
  #28  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally posted by CanadianRX7
yea obviously but the car will be faster none the less
So? Can I rip out my whole interior and claim a 50 hp increase? I think not...
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 06:37 AM
  #29  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Damn, whose pic is that both of you guys are using on the left???
I don't have a 30" monitor, so I can't check out the chicks!&nbsp Anyone got a bigger picture???




-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 08:09 AM
  #30  
t_mak@mail.plymouth.edu's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Norwich CT
Get a time and dyno sheet to back it up. This is turning into a Honda Civic post. "I can do this and I can do that" Well get your numbers and let us see it. Not trying to doubt you, but a guy with bridgetport only did 222hp. I think it will be kind of hard to match that. Turbo might be heavy, but by what, 100-200lbs? Those extra 20 hp would take care of that
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 10:37 AM
  #31  
rx7passion's Avatar
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Az
thats my pic at an import show in seattle, felix is trying to copy me be pasting in his pic
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 11:56 AM
  #32  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
I was there, he keeps cutting me out of the pic....

Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 12:26 PM
  #33  
PaulC's Avatar
Three spinning triangles
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Been all around this world and still call Texas home (Ft Worth)
Back to the thread topic

I have a friend that has a 90 5.0 we dropped a new engine into it and had it dynoed at a local mustang shop. It dynoed at 183 hp at the wheels on basicly a stock motor. I think he step up a tiny bit on the cam and went with roller stuff but basicly stock. After dumping tons of bolt ons he was saying he shoud be near 350 hp at the ground. When he got it dynoed he was only at 278 at the wheels. Not even 100 hp gain for all his effort.

The moral of this story is that just cause a mod is good for X hp doesn't mean its gonna make that in combination with other mods. The effects of various bolt ons are not always cumulative. Besides 1.3liters can only breathe just so hard (unfourtunatly).
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 01:05 PM
  #34  
Felix Wankel's Avatar
Super Newbie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally posted by PaulC
Back to the thread topic

I have a friend that has a 90 5.0 we dropped a new engine into it and had it dynoed at a local mustang shop. It dynoed at 183 hp at the wheels on basicly a stock motor. I think he step up a tiny bit on the cam and went with roller stuff but basicly stock. After dumping tons of bolt ons he was saying he shoud be near 350 hp at the ground. When he got it dynoed he was only at 278 at the wheels. Not even 100 hp gain for all his effort.

The moral of this story is that just cause a mod is good for X hp doesn't mean its gonna make that in combination with other mods. The effects of various bolt ons are not always cumulative. Besides 1.3liters can only breathe just so hard (unfourtunatly).
Exactly.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2001 | 10:06 PM
  #35  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Those gurls are not bad looking!



-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2001 | 04:07 PM
  #36  
FPrep2ndGenRX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: AL
If your familiar with Grassroots Motorsports magazine then your familiar with there rospit project. They took a Triumph Spitfire and put a fuel injected engine built by Craig Nagler of Tri-Point Engineering and still got only 225 HP out of it. The engine was half bridge ported and was using an aftermarket injection controller. I can only imagine they would have done the same if it were possible. We autocrossers are very thrifty at spending the least amount of money to get the most performance out of our cars. I can't imagine you getting close to that at the rear tires. Maybe 170 or so if your lucky. Very lucky. Lets see some dyno slips to make us believers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
23Racer
Race Car Tech
1
Sep 21, 2015 10:48 AM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 17, 2015 09:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.