2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

The fastest streetable NA setup...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-01, 02:22 AM
  #26  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally posted by CanadianRX7
yea obviously but the car will be faster none the less
Yeah, you're correct, but we're arguing about horsepower figures, which really has nothing to do (technically) with our discussion.



-Ted
Old 08-09-01, 02:24 AM
  #27  

 
rx7passion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow nice reted, not to be a complete internet *** but he is definitly not afraid to speak the truth....

now what if i add a performance sticker?
15hp? (unsure on exact outputs on this mod)

hehe j/k no flames please
Old 08-09-01, 02:25 AM
  #28  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by CanadianRX7
yea obviously but the car will be faster none the less
So? Can I rip out my whole interior and claim a 50 hp increase? I think not...
Old 08-09-01, 06:37 AM
  #29  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Damn, whose pic is that both of you guys are using on the left???
I don't have a 30" monitor, so I can't check out the chicks!&nbsp Anyone got a bigger picture???




-Ted
Old 08-09-01, 08:09 AM
  #30  
Senior Member

 
t_mak@mail.plymouth.edu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Norwich CT
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get a time and dyno sheet to back it up. This is turning into a Honda Civic post. "I can do this and I can do that" Well get your numbers and let us see it. Not trying to doubt you, but a guy with bridgetport only did 222hp. I think it will be kind of hard to match that. Turbo might be heavy, but by what, 100-200lbs? Those extra 20 hp would take care of that
Old 08-09-01, 10:37 AM
  #31  

 
rx7passion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats my pic at an import show in seattle, felix is trying to copy me be pasting in his pic
Old 08-09-01, 11:56 AM
  #32  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was there, he keeps cutting me out of the pic....

Old 08-09-01, 12:26 PM
  #33  
Three spinning triangles

 
PaulC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Been all around this world and still call Texas home (Ft Worth)
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back to the thread topic

I have a friend that has a 90 5.0 we dropped a new engine into it and had it dynoed at a local mustang shop. It dynoed at 183 hp at the wheels on basicly a stock motor. I think he step up a tiny bit on the cam and went with roller stuff but basicly stock. After dumping tons of bolt ons he was saying he shoud be near 350 hp at the ground. When he got it dynoed he was only at 278 at the wheels. Not even 100 hp gain for all his effort.

The moral of this story is that just cause a mod is good for X hp doesn't mean its gonna make that in combination with other mods. The effects of various bolt ons are not always cumulative. Besides 1.3liters can only breathe just so hard (unfourtunatly).
Old 08-09-01, 01:05 PM
  #34  
Super Newbie

 
Felix Wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 4,398
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by PaulC
Back to the thread topic

I have a friend that has a 90 5.0 we dropped a new engine into it and had it dynoed at a local mustang shop. It dynoed at 183 hp at the wheels on basicly a stock motor. I think he step up a tiny bit on the cam and went with roller stuff but basicly stock. After dumping tons of bolt ons he was saying he shoud be near 350 hp at the ground. When he got it dynoed he was only at 278 at the wheels. Not even 100 hp gain for all his effort.

The moral of this story is that just cause a mod is good for X hp doesn't mean its gonna make that in combination with other mods. The effects of various bolt ons are not always cumulative. Besides 1.3liters can only breathe just so hard (unfourtunatly).
Exactly.
Old 08-09-01, 10:06 PM
  #35  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Those gurls are not bad looking!



-Ted
Old 08-10-01, 04:07 PM
  #36  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
FPrep2ndGenRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: AL
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your familiar with Grassroots Motorsports magazine then your familiar with there rospit project. They took a Triumph Spitfire and put a fuel injected engine built by Craig Nagler of Tri-Point Engineering and still got only 225 HP out of it. The engine was half bridge ported and was using an aftermarket injection controller. I can only imagine they would have done the same if it were possible. We autocrossers are very thrifty at spending the least amount of money to get the most performance out of our cars. I can't imagine you getting close to that at the rear tires. Maybe 170 or so if your lucky. Very lucky. Lets see some dyno slips to make us believers.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
23Racer
Race Car Tech
1
09-21-15 10:48 AM
josef 91 vert
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-17-15 09:22 PM



Quick Reply: The fastest streetable NA setup...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.