2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Everyones N/A dynoed S-AFC settings wanted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2002 | 10:22 AM
  #51  
von's Avatar
von
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 1
From: sandiego, ca
My settings around 0-3-14-14-12-12-16-17 is around 13.8 A/F ratio. I can go a little leaner. I have stock fuel system and alot of mods. I hope nobody goes mjore than a couple points beyond this or BOOM I set it to 18 across the board and saw a 15.5 A/F ratio in the midrange. Engine is fine but it was scarry. Get it on the dyno with a probe.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 04:25 PM
  #52  
rx7power's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
sorry to bring this out again....

VON: with those a/f ratios, what was the hp that you made? I just tuned my safc and our numbers are almost similar and i was just wondering how much power you made with those settings. Thanx
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #53  
nitroracer's Avatar
Dub'N
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 819
Likes: 1
From: san diego
he was making 158hp at the wheels. the car is no more.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 06:58 PM
  #54  
KiyoKix's Avatar
13B N/A POWA!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere, WRLD
Did the motor die or did the car get hit...by the way you put it I am assuming the worst .
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 08:02 PM
  #55  
rx7power's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
That sux, sorry to hear bout that
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2003 | 08:14 PM
  #56  
rx7power's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
That sux, sorry to hear bout that
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 01:22 AM
  #57  
Ronac's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, B.C.
Can someone move this to safc section?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 01:57 AM
  #58  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
damn i hit 99.1% on my safc (s5 turboII) is that bad?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 02:02 AM
  #59  
Ronac's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, B.C.
Ummm I would be guessing it's because the turbo's have forced induction. So more air for the engine?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 02:04 AM
  #60  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
yeah but you cant alter the airflow anymore once its at 100% (the whole purpose of an safc)
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2004 | 07:17 AM
  #61  
SnowmanSteiner's Avatar
Ga-nome liberator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: Hell
You know there is an S-AFC specific section in the Engine Management forum. Just thought I'd let you guys know if you want to check there, or move this there.

- Steiner
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dkwasherexd
Single Turbo RX-7's
21
May 27, 2017 04:51 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 AM.