2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Ever been a FC coupe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 10:48 PM
  #1  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Ever been a FC coupe?

ME and a friend of mine had a debate the other day about the Acura Integra. He said that he'd worked on and personally seen a coupe, but I know that Honda NEVER made an Integra coupe. Car turned out to be an LS sedan with GSR doors and glass molded to it. Looked VERY slick.

Anyways...that got me thinking about the FC. The FC was the only widely sold convertible (seen some FB's, but I know nothing about them), and I think that, if a couple were made, the vert would be the best platform.

Just curious what you guys would think about that, or if oyu've seen one.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #2  
bingoboy's Avatar
Lava Surfer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
From: Kailua, HI
Interesting idea. In cars that came in coupes and hatchbacks though, I have mostly preferred the look of the hatchback to that of the coupe. Get someone in here with photoshop and we can see how it would turn out. The vert would probably be the best starting point for something like this, but you'd want to lighten the crap out of it if you were going to be adding a hard top or the thing would end up weighing in like a camaro .
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 10:56 PM
  #3  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by bingoboy
Interesting idea. In cars that came in coupes and hatchbacks though, I have mostly preferred the look of the hatchback to that of the coupe. Get someone in here with photoshop and we can see how it would turn out. The vert would probably be the best starting point for something like this, but you'd want to lighten the crap out of it if you were going to be adding a hard top or the thing would end up weighing in like a camaro .

If it were a project I took on all the extra weight of the vert would be removed for the most part...except like the additional bracing from the factory (that can only be beneficial). The top it's self would merely be a number of connecting braces under a composite shell...so that it's self wouldn't weight much. The roll bar, that would still have to be there, would probably weight more than the top.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 10:58 PM
  #4  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
I don't know why I keep writing "weight" instead of "weigh"...
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:02 PM
  #5  
bingoboy's Avatar
Lava Surfer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
From: Kailua, HI
Hmm if you were gonna fab a roof, why not work a tube steel cage into it somehow. Actually I have no idea how hard that would be to do. The extra bracing from the factory could be done away with if you we're going to do something like this as it would probably be many times heavier than anything you'd build/add. Once again just throwing idea's out there from the blank spaces in my head as I have no experience with verts or fabbing stuff as said heheh.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #6  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
I thought the extra bracing in the vert was built into the substructure at the factory...I don't think it can be "removed". Plus...I think that a safety bar would be lighter than a cage built into the roof...but I don't know yet. I do know that it would allow the room to be SUPER light.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #7  
DerangedHermit's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 5
From: Knoxville, TN 37916
Ever been a FC coupe?
I was once, then I woke up.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #8  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
never made an integra coupe?? like this...?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...ayphotohosting


and for what its worth, the 91 n/a RX7s are referred to as "coupe." not gtu, gxl, gtus.

edit: ah, i guess you mean two door sedan body. "coupe" i misleading. i usually just associate it with 'hard top.'

Last edited by casio; Oct 5, 2004 at 11:27 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #9  
NCGNETO90's Avatar
Tru Rotary Playa'
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Boise Idaho
Hey casio. A coupe is a two door with a trunk. A hatch is a two door were the back glass lifts up. What you posted was a 4 door (sedan).
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #10  
koukifc3s's Avatar
Clogged cat
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
someone fotochop it
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:33 PM
  #11  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
yea, but like i said, i usually just associate coupe with hardtop. and according to mazdamark.com, the 91s were called "coupe." and hatchbacks (as i agree with that term) can also be fastbacks, right? that term always threw me off.
i should just delete most of my post, huh. ah well, i edited some, took the pic off.

i do agree that if the convertible rx7 was made into a "coupe," it'd look pretty good. i know i personally prefer most coupe fox body mustangs over the hatches. also, the coupe is lighter.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:37 PM
  #12  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
I thought fastbacks were coupes with sloped backs...like old mustangs...
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #13  
MakoRacing[FC]'s Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: .
I think it would look something like the 240SX coupe.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2004 | 11:40 PM
  #14  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
The non convertible FC is considered a coupe by Mazda.

hench the 86-87.5 Luxury Coupe, the 91 Coupe, etc.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 01:07 AM
  #15  
locketine's Avatar
Road Rotary Aviator
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
why would you want a hardtop 2door rx7 with a trunk? the only vert I like the looks of are the ones that simulate the hatch styling which I think don't have a trunk.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 01:14 AM
  #16  
Makenzie71's Avatar
Thread Starter
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Who cares about a trunk? I just think a coupe would look slick.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 01:18 AM
  #17  
Whitewidebodyrx7's Avatar
Steer with the Rear
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
i think there was a post awhile back of a guy that fibre glassed his vert roof into a hard top and what not looked hinda haggard but it was done
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2004 | 01:22 AM
  #18  
snub disphenoid's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 1
From: Northern California
That would be a rigid car, but it would be very heavy. I say start with a hatchback and add in the extra chassis bracing you want with lightweight materials.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Donald Hampton
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
Nov 23, 2022 06:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.