2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Ever a 200 HP NA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 05:11 AM
  #1  
drago86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
Ever a 200 HP NA?

Just wondering, for the people who have been around longer then me, has there ever been an NA to hit 200 rwhp? Highest ive seen has been 182 from 13bppnos, and 174 from Icemark. Others have looked promising, like Mazdaspeed7, jimi (forgot whole name) and Judge Ito's full bridge 6-port (crashed before dyno, but it beat a t2..), and various other people, but not dynos ever turn up. So whats the official Rx7club verifyed NA rwhp record? (RETed's 3 rotor and the PP's doent count)
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 06:10 AM
  #2  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
i swore i saw a 220rwhp last year sometime
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
SOIA's Avatar
Take A Look Around
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Portage La Prairie, MB Canada
I thought icemark did some work and got his up to 200? I could be wrong tho

edit: here ya go https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=260972

close enough, he estemates 200 FWHP

Last edited by SOIA; Jun 12, 2004 at 09:02 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 09:03 AM
  #4  
BRIDGEP0RTED's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: In hell hell till I get a layoff
I thought racing beat did a n/a with a side draft and got 220 or something.i know there are people in aussi land making 300hp on monster ported (a big bridge port cutting into the water jacket its self) n/as with out n20
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:23 AM
  #5  
Turbo23's Avatar
Panda Bear
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 4
From: Lititz, PA
a pport should get u above 200hp, bridge port could prob get you close with some excellent tuning
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
You might be able to get up to 180-185 RWHP, on a 2 rotor non turbo (non NO2)(non reni) and still have the car streetable, but much past that and the car generally is not something anyone wants to ride with you in, or has other starting & running issues.

Remember a S4 Turbo typically only has about 150 RWHP

Last edited by Icemark; Jun 12, 2004 at 11:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #7  
wpgrexx's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
From: not in winterpeg anymore
I am pretty sure with some tuning I could have had 200 rwhp with my motor. It was built by jimmi325i. But its getting boosted now so I will never know.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 12:46 PM
  #8  
drago86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
So never a confirmed >200 rwhp dyno?

I just did some digging around, and it looks like Icemark has the highest posted dyno sheet at 174.5 hp, Followed by PP13bnos @ 167 (but on a mustang dyno), then Jimmi325i @166.4, and finally RarestRX with 159 (stock port) Did i miss anyone in there?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 01:18 PM
  #9  
Travisty's Avatar
PERFCT7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
now are you talking stock ports or are people allowed to port in this thread? I coulda sworn I saw a close to 275 ported motor (pretty sure it was a street port)
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #10  
drago86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
Streetableish porting,..
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 01:27 PM
  #11  
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
@ pipnorcali
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Grass valley, ca
i am buliding my motor with s5 rotors, street port, turbo II AFM and inj. with a safc, i am trying for 200hp all motor
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 02:50 PM
  #12  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by drago86
So never a confirmed >200 rwhp dyno?

I just did some digging around, and it looks like Icemark has the highest posted dyno sheet at 174.5 hp, Followed by PP13bnos @ 167 (but on a mustang dyno), then Jimmi325i @166.4, and finally RarestRX with 159 (stock port) Did i miss anyone in there?
remember those numbers are RW HP, not flywheel
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 03:25 PM
  #13  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
that and how many of those people are running a standalone? i was going to do a halfbridge 6port for my rebuild (a friend is doing my rebuild and will port however i want), but after talking with mazdaspeed, he talked me out of it. he got into components that would max out on my S5 (as opposed to Ito's full-bridge 6port S4) and that it wouldn't run right. i took his advice and have decided to do a streetport. i'm not in a position to buy a standalone (financially), so i'll have to hold off on bigger n/a numbers.
high horsepower is possible with carbs, but most people shy from this quickly. powerband and streetability may be sacrificed, but the original thread just mentioned surpassing 200rwhp. i bring this up because of a discussion i had with an engine builder.
as far as standalones, you just dont come across it often. most people who want big numbers go turbo and never bother spending over a grand on an ecu setup for their n/a.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #14  
drago86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
True, all of thoose are on stock ECU (+piggy back in some cases), i dont think a stand alone will net 30 HP though, I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #15  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
well, in my case, i'm holding back from doing bridges because i have a stock ecu. i dont believe any of the ones listed are anything more radical than streetports. moreso, i'm curious to how radical of streetports they are. and 30hp is a lot, but didn't RarestRX gain quite a bit with just the s-afc (thats not a retort, thats an honest question)?
so people are achieving ~170 on streetports, imagine adding a few eyebrow cuts (and i know you mentioned streetable; thats debateable, but BDCs car rode fine and 87GTR has a big turbo, half bridge and solid mounts and drives around town). point is, thats a bit more air and its gotta net 30hp. i just wish more people who had the funds and knowhow were curious.
also, these are on stock intake manifolds which is another area i'm very curious of as to restriction.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #16  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,835
Likes: 3,233
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally posted by drago86
True, all of thoose are on stock ECU (+piggy back in some cases), i dont think a stand alone will net 30 HP though, I could be wrong.
the stock ecu is setup for the stock engine, the more you mod it the more you need to make changes in the map/ecu.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #17  
White_FC's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Darwin, NT, Australia
Originally posted by BRIDGEP0RTED
i know there are people in aussi land making 300hp on monster ported (a big bridge port cutting into the water jacket its self) n/as with out n20
Just a small correction here, your most probably talking about the IP Racing guys over here. They're getting upwards of 300hp+ some getting it at 'only' 10,000rpm.

They do not cut into the water jacket. No point, the class rules state very clearly that you cannot modify the rotor _housing_ at all to allow extra air flow.
This therefore completly negates the need to cut into the water jacket, so they don't do it.

They also don't have quite as big ports as you'd might expect...
Lots of secret dark magic in the intake and exhaust design though..
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #18  
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Florida
dark magic sounds nice, a 300 horse n/a must be nice. lightweight rotors i guess or sumthin...
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 07:47 PM
  #19  
87na's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Phx, Arizona
Read this, its very informative http://www.autospeed.com/A_0389/cms/article.html
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #20  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
With astonishing portwork (streetable) horse power that i've seen as been in the 210-215 range. We recently built a motor that managed 219 from a very aggressive street port, ported manifolds and S5 internals running an LT-8 unit. 220-235 could be obtainable with a nicely done Bridgeport however longevity, streetability and gas miliage would suffer greatly... basically if you want 235 hp at the TIRE, your not going to want to drive it every day, it's gunna have running and starting issues just like Mark said, and to be quite honest any bridgeport that large is not going to last much over 50k, there's just not enough room from the bridge to the water jacket.

Alittle under 200 at the tire is respectable for any streetported N/A engine.


Regards,
~Markus
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #21  
drago86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: California, Bay Area
Got a dyno graph?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 10:58 PM
  #22  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
Trust me, it's been done. Even back when Carburators were popular (they still are widely used by some) However if your that sceptical when i get to the office on Monday morning i'll post a Dyno of the 219rwhp VW dune buggy that we converted into a rotary rocket. I may have a picture of the vehicle, let me see...

Regards,
-Markus
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 11:06 PM
  #23  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
This seems to be the only picture i have available of the vehicle right now. Monday when i get to the office i'll post some pictures of this 72 buggy with more engine shots and a dyno graph if my boss still has it on tap.

You'll notice the carb set-up still on the engine, we have isnce upgraded this customers setup back to EFI useing an LT-8 unit. it's really a run ride in this thing that is only 1400 lbs lol

Regards,
-Markus
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 12:29 AM
  #24  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
congrats on the 219, Relisys. i have to ask, though, why would that extra 1 to 16 hp sacrifice reliability so much? i would think a small halfbridge would add enough extra opening without sacrificing engine life. at least not by 50K+ miles.
how'd that rotary dune buggy hold up? i would love a sandrail street setup using a rotary, but i hear a stockport 6port is pushing the limits (powerwise) of the vx box. i dont know how true that claim is, but i wouldnt be surprised since the original vw engines had about, what, 80hp?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 02:13 AM
  #25  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
To be honest after dyno day and tuning of the LT-8 unit the customer was able to get a good 500 miles or so before the stock transaxle took a crap. The unit is currently at "Rancho" in California getting rebuilt with harder gears, beefy syncros and an close ratio 2-3rd gears.

Mainly what kills engine reliability on a bridge port so much is that there is not alot of material left once the port has been finished... There's literatly 1-2 mm of room between the port inlet and the waterjacket seal. As compared to an aggressive street port you still have several (nearly 10mm) of material depending on port configuration to work with.

Also, there's the chance of a side seal simply falling into the bridged port. Normally on a "proper" bridge port the rotor housings are also die-grinded to allow better flow of air coming in from the "bridged provision"

Granted i've seen BP run nearly 100k miles, however when we build a BP for a customer we build them for speed, largest BP possible, as close to the water jacket as possible, and hardened internals to accept high revs which is where a BP is going to make the most power (above 8500 for sure)... All leading to en engine that is MEANT to be beaten on, which in turn means it's more likely not to last as long as a stand streetport or stock ported engine.

The VW is a blast to drive, our Turbo Rotary Miata's are even more fun!
... Yes we produce an install kit (Rotary/Miata conversion)

Regards,
-Markus

Last edited by Relisys190; Jun 13, 2004 at 02:19 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.