2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

engine rebuild measurements using only dial calipers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #1  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
engine rebuild measurements using only dial calipers?

If I get really good dial calipers (accurate to 3 decimal places) can I just use them for all my engine rebuild measurements in place of micrometers? I know I will need telescoping gauges and a dial indicator on a magnetic base no matter what, but will dial calipers suffice for the rest of the measurements? It seems to me they would. What do you think?

thanks for your input
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 12:52 AM
  #2  
Turblown's Avatar
Turn up the boost
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,174
Likes: 236
From: Twin Cities, MN
You need a micrometer/telescoping gauges for the bearings/lobes and running clearances. Dial calipers really just don't cut it to figure out running clearances.
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 03:04 AM
  #3  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
Well, from what I've researched, most micrometers measure with accuracy to 0.0001" while some lesser grade mics measure to 0.001". Most dial calipers measure to 0.001" while some high grade calipers measure to 0.0005". Can a caliper that measures to 0.0005" calculate running clearances at least well enough to fall within specs? I'm trying to cut corners where I can. If I can't cut it here I'll have to try to find a pair I can use.

thanks
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 03:08 AM
  #4  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
Eccentric shaft oil clearance must fall within 0.0016" and 0.0031" right? So yeah, I guess I need some mics.
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 05:42 PM
  #5  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
was i right with that?
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #6  
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 3
From: Coldspring TX
I'm fixing to do mine with just an inside/ outside dial caliper- that's all you need IMO- use a little ingenuity...I've been using test equipment like this for years, though, so I'm biased...If ya think you'll need further tooling, go ahead and get it, you'll have it next time you need it....0016 to .0031 is a BIG range, so electron microscopy is not required
Reply
Old May 13, 2004 | 09:25 PM
  #7  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
Well, when I think about it a range of 0.0015" seems kinda small. If your dealing with a tool that measures to 0.0001 then it is pretty big. But if your dealing with accuracy of .001 then maybe its a pretty small range. I don't know, I've never done a rebuild before so I'm just sharing my thougts. If I can make it work with dial calipers that would be great.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RaY358
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
Aug 19, 2015 11:44 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM
Marty RE
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
Aug 13, 2015 11:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.