2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Does your RX-7 have low-rpm BALLS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-04, 02:33 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does your RX-7 have low-rpm *****?

Hey i have a 10th AE and i was just wondering if because of the turbo the low end torque suffers. If i am anywhere below 3k rpm my car dogs it like a poodle, even at open throttle i will nearly be stagnating untill it gets above 3500 or so. Is this normal because i know that the rotaries just love those high rpm's...
Old 04-02-04, 02:46 AM
  #2  
Rotary Motoring

iTrader: (9)
 
BLUE TII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 8,217
Received 765 Likes on 507 Posts
My TII felt like that when it had a clogged precat. I would suspect exhaust restriction unless you have taken care of that already.
Old 04-02-04, 04:10 AM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Millville, NJ
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mine wouldnt boost at all with the stock cat/precat. After I replaced them, it boost really early..
Old 04-02-04, 09:09 AM
  #4  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
1500RPM+ it isn't too bad

2500RPM+ it pulls like a sonofabitch

4000rpm+ it makes passangers say "holy ****"

so as you can see, its kind of a building power curve... by 3500RPM it should certainly be pulling HARD... by 2500RPM you should see full boost, and it should certainly feel like it's getting "on" the powerband
Old 04-02-04, 09:32 AM
  #5  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
OverDriven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exhaust restriction or you ar running too rich. My N/A was running really rich and did the exact same thing at anything below 3-4k RPM.

-Joe
Old 04-02-04, 09:35 AM
  #6  
HAILERS

 
HAILERS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
It could also be running way too rich at low rpms for ?????? reason. The only way to tell for sure is to have someone put a wideband on the car and take a look at the afr. Maybe go to where there is a dyno??
Old 04-02-04, 09:36 AM
  #7  
Im Ron Burgandy..

 
rotoboy20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have an N/A, that little ****** will pull hard from 2k in the lower gears. 4th and 5th will pull hard after 4k. its fun! yea, i agree with the other t2 guys, you might wanna replace or take out your cats all together. unless you have emissions laws where you are, then it might be a good idea to get new cats.

-chris
Old 04-02-04, 09:59 AM
  #8  
Rotary Powered

iTrader: (2)
 
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
this car has a lot of torque, but nothing under about 2500rpm
Old 04-02-04, 10:10 AM
  #9  
pistons=teh suck

 
sectachrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
my car doesnt pull for **** in first, but in second it pulls real good.
Old 04-02-04, 12:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea out here there is no emissions laws, so all of the cats have been removed with a straight-thru bonez system (sweet ) i am running incredibly rich though, and im not sure exactly why either. im just affraid to try and lean it out because of the problems with detonation, and how would i go about leaning it out without buying an aftermarket fuel controler like the apexi afc i was looking at?
Old 04-02-04, 12:47 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
zbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: scranton nd
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
mine pulls like hell know , with the supercharger i have 6psi at 1500rpm
Old 04-02-04, 01:03 PM
  #12  
Junior Member

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know, the point of a turbocharger is to give it more 'low RPM *****'
They make the RPM's go up quicker [especially lower rpms] without giving it a hell of a lot more horsepower which = lower racing class = lower insurance etc... Superchargers on the other hand double the hp and make em scream
Old 04-02-04, 01:31 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
Bebesito21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mine has big bad cojones when i open the bottle.....
Old 04-02-04, 01:48 PM
  #14  
Rotary Enthusiast

iTrader: (31)
 
carx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by fusion-turbo
so all of the cats have been removed with a straight-thru bonez system (sweet ) i am running incredibly rich though, and im not sure exactly why either. im just affraid to try and lean it out because of the problems with detonation, and how would i go about leaning it out without buying an aftermarket fuel controler like the apexi afc i was looking at?
Something doesn't make sense there. If you have no cats... you should be boosting more than stock... which means you should be lean. UNLESS, the previous owner (I'm assuming you recently purchased the car?) put in some larger injectors to compensate for more air.... but didn't buy the necessary hardware (AFC) to tune them down.

THe only way your going to take away fuel is with a fuel controller or smaller in jectors and the latter would almost certainly be a step in the wrong direction.

-C
Old 04-02-04, 03:32 PM
  #15  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is what i have done: its a stock J-SPEC engine (most likely stock injectors too, i didnt change them) with a straight thru exhaust. The other owner blew the motor and i bought the car from him for 250 bucks (quite a steal eh?) theres no emmisions crap, the ACV is still on there but i plugged it up. I agree, it should be running leaner, but whenever i stop the car or i have people drive behind me, they say that they can smell the fuel, and it smells really potent. i havent actually checked the air/fuel ratio with a meter, but my guess is that its still running very rich.
Old 04-02-04, 07:16 PM
  #16  
SPQR

iTrader: (1)
 
n4ji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Terrh
1500RPM+ it isn't too bad

2500RPM+ it pulls like a sonofabitch

4000rpm+ it makes passangers say "holy ****"
Yep, that's the way it is for me too.

Gotta love it.
Old 04-02-04, 07:52 PM
  #17  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
RylAssassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbos increase low end torque by a **** load. I owned an N/A before my TII and it had no torque under 3k.
My TII pulls me back at 2500k with a decent amount acceleration.
Old 04-02-04, 11:34 PM
  #18  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by carx7
If you have no cats... you should be boosting more than stock... which means you should be lean.
Increasing boost does not make the engine instantly run lean. Unless boost is excessive (and just removing cats won't do that), the mixtures will still be quite rich under load due to the conservative stock tuning.
Old 04-03-04, 12:21 AM
  #19  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drove a stock tIIs and it was a dog for power in the low band when partial throttle is applied. If I wound up the engine and kept my foot _all the way_ in the gas, it would spool the turbo and accelerate almost as fast as my ported NA does. But it was heavy and stock, while my NA is 2400lbs and ported.

To answer the original question, yes, for an NA, I would say that my car has low end *****. It has more torque than before I ported it and it is sometimes hard to drive gently in town due to the instant torque response. It's no V8 but good for an NA rotary.
Old 04-03-04, 01:08 AM
  #20  
What a waste.

iTrader: (9)
 
PsYcLo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
rotaries dont have low end torque as a rule of thumb :P unless of course you have a supercharger
Old 04-03-04, 01:36 AM
  #21  
pip
the blackest incarnation

 
pip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I know is I can do without the low end tourque when I have what I have at 4500 rpm and up
Old 04-03-04, 07:54 AM
  #22  
Full Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I ve got a tII 88 w/ 370 rwhp. I put a cut out where the cat was and i was making full boost by 2k.The only problem is traction.dont do this you dont have enough fuel.why do you want low end tourque you can rev for ever.you are going the wrong way.you want to leave the light a little quicker leave at 4-5k.any questions ask the 7 in flames.
Old 04-03-04, 10:53 AM
  #23  
HAILERS

 
HAILERS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Increasing boost does not make the engine instantly run lean. Unless boost is excessive (and just removing cats won't do that), the mixtures will still be quite rich under load due to the conservative stock tuning.
EGGGGZZZZACTLY! It seems to me I'm the only one on the face of the planed that is taking fuel AWAY when using a SAFC. That's on two different turboII. In my honest opinion the stock ECU runs pig rich. I'm using a wideband to confirm that (in my mind anyway). Now I don't have the three inch full exaust, just the 2.5 inch downpipe and presilencers and exaust ....but the things run pig rich in my opinion.

For what it's worth.......a jackup afm will cause the engine/ECU to so rich it will lack power and have the symptoms you describe (Cold Fusion Turbo ).
Old 04-03-04, 03:21 PM
  #24  
pip
the blackest incarnation

 
pip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you dont think you are running pig rich and you dont have a wideband go take an emissions test in the state of wisconsin and compare your hc content to the legal limit. Its pretty amazing.
Old 04-03-04, 03:24 PM
  #25  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I live at 4500ft. elevation, and whenever i drive to phoenix at an altitude of about 2300 or so, this problem stops. That would make my car lean way out and stop this rich b.s., so i guess the SAFC would be the way to go. But still, who needs low end when you can rev forever?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toplessFC3Sman
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
03-20-18 01:54 PM
alfred1976
1st Gen General Discussion
6
10-01-17 09:51 PM
j_tso
1st Gen General Discussion
1
09-18-15 03:46 PM



Quick Reply: Does your RX-7 have low-rpm BALLS?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.