2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Does your RX-7 have low-rpm BALLS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 02:33 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: AZ/CA
Does your RX-7 have low-rpm *****?

Hey i have a 10th AE and i was just wondering if because of the turbo the low end torque suffers. If i am anywhere below 3k rpm my car dogs it like a poodle, even at open throttle i will nearly be stagnating untill it gets above 3500 or so. Is this normal because i know that the rotaries just love those high rpm's...
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 02:46 AM
  #2  
BLUE TII's Avatar
Rotary Motoring
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 8,480
Likes: 935
From: CA
My TII felt like that when it had a clogged precat. I would suspect exhaust restriction unless you have taken care of that already.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 04:10 AM
  #3  
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Millville, NJ
Mine wouldnt boost at all with the stock cat/precat. After I replaced them, it boost really early..
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:09 AM
  #4  
Terrh's Avatar
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
1500RPM+ it isn't too bad

2500RPM+ it pulls like a sonofabitch

4000rpm+ it makes passangers say "holy ****"

so as you can see, its kind of a building power curve... by 3500RPM it should certainly be pulling HARD... by 2500RPM you should see full boost, and it should certainly feel like it's getting "on" the powerband
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:32 AM
  #5  
OverDriven's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: VA
Exhaust restriction or you ar running too rich. My N/A was running really rich and did the exact same thing at anything below 3-4k RPM.

-Joe
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:35 AM
  #6  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
It could also be running way too rich at low rpms for ?????? reason. The only way to tell for sure is to have someone put a wideband on the car and take a look at the afr. Maybe go to where there is a dyno??
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:36 AM
  #7  
rotoboy20's Avatar
Im Ron Burgandy..
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, South Carolina
i have an N/A, that little ****** will pull hard from 2k in the lower gears. 4th and 5th will pull hard after 4k. its fun! yea, i agree with the other t2 guys, you might wanna replace or take out your cats all together. unless you have emissions laws where you are, then it might be a good idea to get new cats.

-chris
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:59 AM
  #8  
Rx-7Addict's Avatar
Rotary Powered
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
this car has a lot of torque, but nothing under about 2500rpm
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 10:10 AM
  #9  
sectachrome's Avatar
pistons=teh suck
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
From: NJ
my car doesnt pull for **** in first, but in second it pulls real good.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 12:40 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: AZ/CA
yea out here there is no emissions laws, so all of the cats have been removed with a straight-thru bonez system (sweet ) i am running incredibly rich though, and im not sure exactly why either. im just affraid to try and lean it out because of the problems with detonation, and how would i go about leaning it out without buying an aftermarket fuel controler like the apexi afc i was looking at?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #11  
zbrown's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 644
Likes: 1
From: scranton nd
mine pulls like hell know , with the supercharger i have 6psi at 1500rpm
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
You know, the point of a turbocharger is to give it more 'low RPM *****'
They make the RPM's go up quicker [especially lower rpms] without giving it a hell of a lot more horsepower which = lower racing class = lower insurance etc... Superchargers on the other hand double the hp and make em scream
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 01:31 PM
  #13  
Bebesito21's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
mine has big bad cojones when i open the bottle.....
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #14  
carx7's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 3
From: Austin, Tx
Originally posted by fusion-turbo
so all of the cats have been removed with a straight-thru bonez system (sweet ) i am running incredibly rich though, and im not sure exactly why either. im just affraid to try and lean it out because of the problems with detonation, and how would i go about leaning it out without buying an aftermarket fuel controler like the apexi afc i was looking at?
Something doesn't make sense there. If you have no cats... you should be boosting more than stock... which means you should be lean. UNLESS, the previous owner (I'm assuming you recently purchased the car?) put in some larger injectors to compensate for more air.... but didn't buy the necessary hardware (AFC) to tune them down.

THe only way your going to take away fuel is with a fuel controller or smaller in jectors and the latter would almost certainly be a step in the wrong direction.

-C
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 03:32 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: AZ/CA
This is what i have done: its a stock J-SPEC engine (most likely stock injectors too, i didnt change them) with a straight thru exhaust. The other owner blew the motor and i bought the car from him for 250 bucks (quite a steal eh?) theres no emmisions crap, the ACV is still on there but i plugged it up. I agree, it should be running leaner, but whenever i stop the car or i have people drive behind me, they say that they can smell the fuel, and it smells really potent. i havent actually checked the air/fuel ratio with a meter, but my guess is that its still running very rich.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 07:16 PM
  #16  
n4ji's Avatar
SPQR
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Originally posted by Terrh
1500RPM+ it isn't too bad

2500RPM+ it pulls like a sonofabitch

4000rpm+ it makes passangers say "holy ****"
Yep, that's the way it is for me too.

Gotta love it.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #17  
RylAssassin's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Turbos increase low end torque by a **** load. I owned an N/A before my TII and it had no torque under 3k.
My TII pulls me back at 2500k with a decent amount acceleration.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 11:34 PM
  #18  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally posted by carx7
If you have no cats... you should be boosting more than stock... which means you should be lean.
Increasing boost does not make the engine instantly run lean. Unless boost is excessive (and just removing cats won't do that), the mixtures will still be quite rich under load due to the conservative stock tuning.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 12:21 AM
  #19  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I drove a stock tIIs and it was a dog for power in the low band when partial throttle is applied. If I wound up the engine and kept my foot _all the way_ in the gas, it would spool the turbo and accelerate almost as fast as my ported NA does. But it was heavy and stock, while my NA is 2400lbs and ported.

To answer the original question, yes, for an NA, I would say that my car has low end *****. It has more torque than before I ported it and it is sometimes hard to drive gently in town due to the instant torque response. It's no V8 but good for an NA rotary.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 01:08 AM
  #20  
PsYcLo's Avatar
What a waste.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 1
From: Stockholm
rotaries dont have low end torque as a rule of thumb :P unless of course you have a supercharger
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 01:36 AM
  #21  
pip's Avatar
pip
the blackest incarnation
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
All I know is I can do without the low end tourque when I have what I have at 4500 rpm and up
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 07:54 AM
  #22  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx
I ve got a tII 88 w/ 370 rwhp. I put a cut out where the cat was and i was making full boost by 2k.The only problem is traction.dont do this you dont have enough fuel.why do you want low end tourque you can rev for ever.you are going the wrong way.you want to leave the light a little quicker leave at 4-5k.any questions ask the 7 in flames.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #23  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Increasing boost does not make the engine instantly run lean. Unless boost is excessive (and just removing cats won't do that), the mixtures will still be quite rich under load due to the conservative stock tuning.
EGGGGZZZZACTLY! It seems to me I'm the only one on the face of the planed that is taking fuel AWAY when using a SAFC. That's on two different turboII. In my honest opinion the stock ECU runs pig rich. I'm using a wideband to confirm that (in my mind anyway). Now I don't have the three inch full exaust, just the 2.5 inch downpipe and presilencers and exaust ....but the things run pig rich in my opinion.

For what it's worth.......a jackup afm will cause the engine/ECU to so rich it will lack power and have the symptoms you describe (Cold Fusion Turbo ).
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #24  
pip's Avatar
pip
the blackest incarnation
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
If you dont think you are running pig rich and you dont have a wideband go take an emissions test in the state of wisconsin and compare your hc content to the legal limit. Its pretty amazing.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #25  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: AZ/CA
I live at 4500ft. elevation, and whenever i drive to phoenix at an altitude of about 2300 or so, this problem stops. That would make my car lean way out and stop this rich b.s., so i guess the SAFC would be the way to go. But still, who needs low end when you can rev forever?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toplessFC3Sman
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Mar 20, 2018 01:54 PM
alfred1976
1st Gen General Discussion
6
Oct 1, 2017 09:51 PM
j_tso
1st Gen General Discussion
1
Sep 18, 2015 03:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.