does rtek 1.7 s4 with s5 block= lean??
#1
does rtek 1.7 s4 with s5 block= lean??
i have an 87 t2 with full 3" exhaust, and TID mod, ported waste gate ,
i have the rtek 1.7 with the 720 injectors , and its designed for a s4 engine,
ive heard of a few people doing s5 block with s4 manifolds with that setup,which has higher compression and a slightly better turbo...
would the s5 short block with all the s4 parts on it, cause a lean condition with the rtek maps?? im not sure what would actaully happen, as i dont under stand how the computer works exactly....
the thought allways kind of worrys me that it might run lean with that motor....
reason i ask is im having a hard time fiding a good jdm s4 motor in my area, but i found a few really nice s5 ones..... rebuilding isnt a worthy option for me is all i can say.....
i have the rtek 1.7 with the 720 injectors , and its designed for a s4 engine,
ive heard of a few people doing s5 block with s4 manifolds with that setup,which has higher compression and a slightly better turbo...
would the s5 short block with all the s4 parts on it, cause a lean condition with the rtek maps?? im not sure what would actaully happen, as i dont under stand how the computer works exactly....
the thought allways kind of worrys me that it might run lean with that motor....
reason i ask is im having a hard time fiding a good jdm s4 motor in my area, but i found a few really nice s5 ones..... rebuilding isnt a worthy option for me is all i can say.....
#2
just dont care.
iTrader: (6)
the ecu is going to supply enough fuel for an engine running 8.5:1 rotors. the 9.0:1 engine is going to make more power, have a better turbo, and need a little bit more fuel per the same boost as the 8.5 motor.
so yeah, i'd guess it would be maybe a little lean. just put a wideband on it to verify
so yeah, i'd guess it would be maybe a little lean. just put a wideband on it to verify
#3
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Compression does not affect mixtures, so a wideband won't show jack. With higher compression the same amount of air and fuel goes in, it just gets squeezed a bit harder. The reason you may need to increase fuelling is that more compression generates more heat, which increases the chance of detonation. The extra fuel is to absorb that heat. But in this case the compression increase is small (~6%) and unless it was on the verge of detonation before it's unlikely to be a problem now. If you've paid attention to keeping intake temps down (cold air intake, FMIC) then the detonation shouldn't be an issue.
#6
Lives on the Forum
NZConvertible is right.
It's a compression ratio issue - not an AFR one.
Going from 8.5 to 9.0 isn't that bad, and I doubt you'd run into any problems.
Nothing that premium pump gas can't fix...
-Ted
It's a compression ratio issue - not an AFR one.
Going from 8.5 to 9.0 isn't that bad, and I doubt you'd run into any problems.
Nothing that premium pump gas can't fix...
-Ted
#7
do s4 and s5 have different timing settings??? im wondering if droping the cas back a few degress would put me more in a safe zone..
i was planning on running 10-12 psi with this setup.... but i worry about detonation
i allways use premium anyway.....
anyone using this setup to confirm??
i was planning on running 10-12 psi with this setup.... but i worry about detonation
i allways use premium anyway.....
anyone using this setup to confirm??
Trending Topics
#10
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by kompressorlogic
im wondering if droping the cas back a few degress would put me more in a safe zone.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post