2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Does my wheel look kinda weird?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 05:06 AM
  #27  
rhscare's Avatar
Rotary No Ka Oi
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 433
Likes: 1
From: Honolulu, HI
You are gonna need a mild widebody of some kind for that to look right, but I dont know why you would do that for 15"s.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 06:22 AM
  #28  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 23
From: n
Originally Posted by Karack
wire wheels with negative offset sticking out 4" is a little different than a 0 offset wheel, like i said it is true to an extent, the extent being how far the wheel is offset.
It was an extreme example to illustrate the case...

believe me i know since i deal with it on my truck but that also is a bit of an extreme since the tires are about 4" offset and are 33" on an S-10 pickup which was never meant to have tires that big on it. but it generally takes about 40-50k miles before the bearings are worn even with moderate abuse offroading.
Since when suspension geometries from a (an off-road) truck is applicable to the FC?


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 07:03 AM
  #29  
My5ABaby's Avatar
Rotaries confuse me
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,219
Likes: 3
From: Murfreesboro, TN
Originally Posted by RETed
If you're going to insult us like that...

You're a dumbass to run such radical offset.
Did you know that running such extreme offsets puts unnecessary stress on the suspension components?
Also, do you know that this can adversely affect steering and how the car handles?
This means you're prematurely wearing out the hubs / bearings, and steering joints...

Yeah, I thought so...


-Ted
The person who "insulted us" wasn't the thread starter.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #30  
RotaDrift's Avatar
Red Rocket
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Hanover, PA
dude you need coilovers bad. and some camber plates up front to give some neg. camber. If u do that i garantee that it will look bad ***. "Lip Tuck" I see what ur seeing in the future....and it looks good
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #31  
Richter12x2's Avatar
Taste great, more filling
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by ePH C freak
RETed is the man around here. if anything, he's just trying to help you out...
I'll second that! ReTed's like the official FC alcoholic grandpa. He knows his stuff backwards and forwards, wants what's best for you, and isn't afraid to call you a dumbass.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #32  
KeloidJonesJr.'s Avatar
strictly business
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,187
Likes: 0
From: chamber of farts
What kind of suspension are you goign to setup? Shock/spring or coilovers/
Originally Posted by ePH C freak
here's i nice example:



Why the vent?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #33  
gabe30's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
well i know you're goign to do it already.. lower/pull fenders what not.. but yeah.. you don't need a widebody unless you chose to to have those wheels sit flush.. maybe some fender flares.. i believe panspeed has a nice set =].. other than that.. i like ssr meshies.. more so on the formula meshies than the reverse meshies.. and then some on the star sharks =]

but yeah.. nice rims.. looks great.. but 15"s?

oh yeah.. the 0 offset might be a bad idea.. like everyones talking about.. well argueing about
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #34  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by RETed
It was an extreme example to illustrate the case...


Since when suspension geometries from a (an off-road) truck is applicable to the FC?


-Ted

the geometry is the same aside from the larger tire, the offset examples are similar just there is more tire on the road. now you're just getting pissy because i semi disagree with you.

running those wheels i doubt he would ever have an issue with worn bearings (so long as they are serviced properly)with the brakes wearing abnormally or the wheels/lugs having issues. i agree though that they look assy on an FC, they are too small of a wheel so the tire will look huge if he wants it proportionally correct and then will have to pull the fenders even more to fit them, which is why i said to ditch the idea and stick with 16-17" wheels with a slightly less radical offset for an FC.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 12:03 AM
  #35  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 23
From: n
I agree that if the original poster were going to "granny" drive his FC, then the wear is going to be insignificant.
If you start to really load up the tires, then I'd be it'll eat bearings within a significant amount of time.
The FC front bearings tend to get eaten on heavily track cars within a year.
Add the significant change in tire specs up front, and you get a very bad situation.

Hell, nobody listens to me anyways, so it really doesn't matter...


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2006 | 05:34 AM
  #36  
gabe30's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
i enjoy your input.. even though theres arguements..

he's right.. in the long run it would heavily wear them down.. and it is your car.. so you should take utter care of it..

it's like having a rock in your shoe.. you might be able to deal with it.. but later on.. its going to hurt
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 AM.