2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Does mazda really care about rotor weights?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-07, 09:54 AM
  #1  
GSL-SE PRO

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JIMMY54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MISSISSAUGA, ONT. CAN
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does mazda really care about rotor weights?

Heres something i found. I took apart my s4 13bt, only to find that it has 2 mismatched rotors... 1 E and 1 B. Now this defeats the 1 or even 2 letter rule. Also, I havent been able to find anywhere in the FSM that states anything regarding the rotor weights. Lastly, if they truly were so important, why isnt there different part numbers for the different letter rotors?

What are your thoughts on this?

Im sure someone has built a "mis-matched" motor w/o balancing
Old 06-22-07, 10:12 AM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
They are not mismatched.
The "E" that you saw is actually a backwards "yo" - katakana Japanese.

The actually rotor weight stamp is something else...not "E".


-Ted
Old 06-22-07, 10:27 AM
  #3  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
so nice of your rotors to greet you with "yo" when you crack open your block... :P
Old 06-22-07, 10:45 AM
  #4  
GSL-SE PRO

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JIMMY54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MISSISSAUGA, ONT. CAN
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Never heard that before...So what/where is the true rotor weight stamp?
Old 06-22-07, 10:49 AM
  #5  
Manual Rack

iTrader: (50)
 
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wanaque NJ
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Im pretty sure you been mistaken, check over your rotors again you might find a different letter. Its happend before and it will again.
Old 06-22-07, 11:04 AM
  #6  
GSL-SE PRO

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JIMMY54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MISSISSAUGA, ONT. CAN
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no no, i've checked over the rotors, im definatly correct... Both letters located in same place of rotor, and as described by others on the forum...
Old 06-22-07, 11:53 AM
  #7  
Open up! Search Warrant!

 
Project84's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kicking down doors in a neighborhood near you
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Someone post a pic so everyone will all be on the same page with this.
Old 06-22-07, 11:59 AM
  #8  
GSL-SE PRO

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
JIMMY54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MISSISSAUGA, ONT. CAN
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Heres a picture i found on the forum

Old 06-22-07, 12:54 PM
  #9  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
The weights are not absolute. I weigh most of mine on a digital scale. The A is generally heaviest of a given type of rotor, while E is the lightest. However...I have seen B's that weigh the same as D's. I've also weighed a bunch of C's in a row (the most common letter) and gotten almost exactly the same weight, and then weighed a B that was lighter than all of those C's that I just weighed. I've had times were E's and D's weighed the same.

Every once in a while I see a rotor marked "CE" or "BE"...both letters right beside each other, but not necessarily aligned as if you wrote them side by side. This is where the japanese comes into play...they just happened to stamp the "C" or whatever right beside the "m" japanese symbol. They always weigh whatever the first letter is..."C" or whatever it is.

So again it is not absolute.
Old 06-22-07, 01:18 PM
  #10  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
well, depending on how much those weight categories differ it might be possible for wear and tear of use to account for the weight differences noted when checking used rotors...
Old 06-22-07, 01:23 PM
  #11  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (8)
 
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
Posts: 11,576
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Wear and tear of use? Rotors don't wear. They don't touch any surface...they float. Bearing wear can't account for the difference, as that's only a few grams at most. The rotor tips where the apex seals slide do "v" out slightly but again this is only a few grams difference...maybe 0.02 or 0.04lb. Rotor weights can vary by 0.2lb.
Old 06-22-07, 02:26 PM
  #12  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
like I said I wasn't sure how much the categories differed, so now I know that that isn't a cause.

I can say with certainty though that all weight recordings from the SAME SCALE should be precise in relation to one another. My guess is that the stamped rotors were either weighed on different scales (thus, one or both scales could be incorrect), someone made a mistake, or both.
Old 06-22-07, 03:09 PM
  #13  
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.

iTrader: (3)
 
classicauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hagersville Ontario
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedOfLife
I can say with certainty though that all weight recordings from the SAME SCALE should be precise in relation to one another. My guess is that the stamped rotors were either weighed on different scales (thus, one or both scales could be incorrect), someone made a mistake, or both.
Or its the way things are. I weighed two "D" weight S5 rotors after washing the oil out of them when I tore down my J-spec over two years ago.

Weighed them on my paint mixing scale (which is accurate to the 10th of a gram) and came up with 2.1 gram difference between the two.

Same scale, calibrated yearly, within minutes of one another, same weight stamp rotor.

Edit: My experience is with only this one pair of rotors, so I dunno how near or far my findings are from the norm. But thats what I found.
Old 06-22-07, 03:15 PM
  #14  
rotors excite me

iTrader: (16)
 
SpeedOfLife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Central Iowa
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
for one, I'm sure the weight stamp doesn't mean "this rotor weighs EXACTLY x", I would imagine it's supposed to denote that rotor is within a certain range of values for the weight. secondly, a normal sized paperclip weighs near a gram. that said, 2.1 grams is not very much metal compared to all the metal in a rotor.
Old 06-22-07, 03:17 PM
  #15  
ERTW

iTrader: (1)
 
coldfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there will be some weight discrepancy, that's just based on an imperfect manufacturing process, but there is a certain tolerance of error that is acceptable.
Mazda apparently went to a new improved manufacturing process for rotors for the Renesis, so i would be willing to bet you would see less discrepancy with those.

back to what JIMMY54 was asking though, are rotors supposed to have some sort of matched marking on them?
Old 06-22-07, 03:22 PM
  #16  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,829
Received 2,597 Likes on 1,845 Posts
they probably grade a batch of rotors at once, so the letters would maybe apply to that production lot number
Old 06-22-07, 03:27 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
RoTa7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for one, I'm sure the weight stamp doesn't mean "this rotor weighs EXACTLY x", I would imagine it's supposed to denote that rotor is within a certain range of values for the weight. secondly, a normal sized paperclip weighs near a gram. that said, 2.1 grams is not very much metal compared to all the metal in a rotor.
came up with 2.1 gram difference between the two.
the difference was 2.1g, that wasnt the weight of the rotor
Old 06-22-07, 03:47 PM
  #18  
Adaptronic Distributor
RX7Club Vendor
iTrader: (12)
 
Turblown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 7,066
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
The weights are not absolute. I weigh most of mine on a digital scale. The A is generally heaviest of a given type of rotor, while E is the lightest. However...I have seen B's that weigh the same as D's. I've also weighed a bunch of C's in a row (the most common letter) and gotten almost exactly the same weight, and then weighed a B that was lighter than all of those C's that I just weighed. I've had times were E's and D's weighed the same.

Every once in a while I see a rotor marked "CE" or "BE"...both letters right beside each other, but not necessarily aligned as if you wrote them side by side. This is where the japanese comes into play...they just happened to stamp the "C" or whatever right beside the "m" japanese symbol. They always weigh whatever the first letter is..."C" or whatever it is.

So again it is not absolute.
Exactly,

We never rebuild any type of engine w/o balancing, benefits far outweigh the low cost...
__________________
Rotary Performance Parts


Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
11-15-17 08:44 AM
VTECthis
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
08-24-15 09:01 PM



Quick Reply: Does mazda really care about rotor weights?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.