Do they have 10th Anniversary in Japan ?
12-03-03, 12:58 PM
#1
Do they have 10th Anniversary in Japan ?
my friend says he needs the JDM 10th Anniversary ECU, i told him just to get a normal 86-88 JDM ECU coz from what i remember is all JDM 86-88 are the same
we've been argueing for quite a while, i believe someone here can answer my question
we've been argueing for quite a while, i believe someone here can answer my question
12-03-03, 01:00 PM
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,844
Received 2,606 Likes
on
1,849 Posts
the 10ae over here uses the same n333 ecu as any other 88 turbo 2
12-03-03, 01:26 PM
#4
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Even if there was a 10AE in Japan (which there wasn't), the 10AE was purely a cosmetic upgrade. It was mechanically identical to all other S4 Turbos, so no special ECU was used.
There's also no need to use a J-spec ECU on a J-spec engine. The differences in the ECU were for things like emission controls (or the lack of) and speed limiters rather than the actual major engine functions.
There's also no need to use a J-spec ECU on a J-spec engine. The differences in the ECU were for things like emission controls (or the lack of) and speed limiters rather than the actual major engine functions.
12-03-03, 01:44 PM
#6
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Even if there was a 10AE in Japan (which there wasn't), the 10AE was purely a cosmetic upgrade. It was mechanically identical to all other S4 Turbos, so no special ECU was used.
There's also no need to use a J-spec ECU on a J-spec engine. The differences in the ECU were for things like emission controls (or the lack of) and speed limiters rather than the actual major engine functions.
Even if there was a 10AE in Japan (which there wasn't), the 10AE was purely a cosmetic upgrade. It was mechanically identical to all other S4 Turbos, so no special ECU was used.
There's also no need to use a J-spec ECU on a J-spec engine. The differences in the ECU were for things like emission controls (or the lack of) and speed limiters rather than the actual major engine functions.
12-03-03, 02:06 PM
#7
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Japanese FC's (S4 and S5) had fewer ECU-controlled emissions-related stuff than US models (no AWS, 3000rpm cold-start, EGR, port-air solenoid, shift-up light), and they had a 180km/h speed limiter.
I don't know what the ECU numbers were.
I don't know what the ECU numbers were.
Trending Topics
12-15-03, 01:29 PM
#9
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,844
Received 2,606 Likes
on
1,849 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
Japanese FC's (S4 and S5) had fewer ECU-controlled emissions-related stuff than US models (no AWS, 3000rpm cold-start, EGR, port-air solenoid, shift-up light), and they had a 180km/h speed limiter.
I don't know what the ECU numbers were.
Japanese FC's (S4 and S5) had fewer ECU-controlled emissions-related stuff than US models (no AWS, 3000rpm cold-start, EGR, port-air solenoid, shift-up light), and they had a 180km/h speed limiter.
I don't know what the ECU numbers were.
n319 for 87-88.4
n340 for 88.4 to 89
n374 for 89-91
this is not a 100% accurate list
12-15-03, 04:14 PM
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,844
Received 2,606 Likes
on
1,849 Posts
Originally posted by j9fd3s
should be n318, for 86
n319 for 87-88.4
n340 for 88.4 to 89
n374 for 89-91
this is not a 100% accurate list
should be n318, for 86
n319 for 87-88.4
n340 for 88.4 to 89
n374 for 89-91
this is not a 100% accurate list
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post