2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Detonation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-02, 06:04 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
SilverT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oswego, NY
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Detonation

I now think I am getting detonation under load in hot weather. Happend to me twice doing 80. I supsect it might be the K/N cone, as it was superheated. Under hood temps were around 160 to 180.

Will added heat through the K/N cause detionation or should I be looking at somthing else?
Old 06-11-02, 06:08 PM
  #2  
Formula Mazda Driver

 
SpeedRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 680
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Detonation is usually caused by:
a. timing too far advanced
b. Fuel octane too low
c. Running lean
Old 06-11-02, 06:09 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
Ranzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis, Japan
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It could contribute to it but I would look other places. Is your timing set right? Any ignition mods? what kinda fuel are you using maybe it is bad gasoline.
Old 06-11-02, 06:25 PM
  #4  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: Detonation

Originally posted by SilverT2
I supsect it might be the K/N cone, as it was superheated. Under hood temps were around 160 to 180.
Ouch! Get a heat shield and cold air duct in there ASAP.
Will added heat through the K/N cause detionation...
Hell yes!
Old 06-11-02, 06:27 PM
  #5  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by SpeedRacer
Detonation is usually caused by:
a. timing too far advanced
b. Fuel octane too low
c. Running lean
d. High intake temps
Old 06-11-02, 06:40 PM
  #6  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
SilverT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oswego, NY
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tank was filled with mobil 93 yesterday, I usually run 89, switched to 93 a week ago.
Old 06-11-02, 06:43 PM
  #7  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally posted by SilverT2
The tank was filled with mobil 93 yesterday, I usually run 89, switched to 93 a week ago.
Maybe you should switch back?

e. Bad gas
Old 06-11-02, 08:50 PM
  #8  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
It could be bad gas, but I’d still stick with the higher octane. Run the tank as low as possible (no full-load runs in the mean time) than refill from a different place. If the problem persists, it probably not the gas.

(And get that heat shield.)
Old 06-12-02, 01:09 AM
  #9  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
It could be bad gas, but I’d still stick with the higher octane. Run the tank as low as possible (no full-load runs in the mean time) than refill from a different place. If the problem persists, it probably not the gas.

(And get that heat shield.)
US 93 octane is equivalent to 97 octane in NZ. If a stock engine is detonating on that, then there is something very wrong. I have driven stock-engine S4 TII's with underhood intakes at well over 100mph with 87 octane in ambient temperatures over 100 F, and never had any detonation problems.
Old 06-12-02, 01:46 AM
  #10  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
US 93 octane is equivalent to 97 octane in NZ. If a stock engine is detonating on that, then there is something very wrong.
True, I don't think it's an octane realated problem, but I think it should have been on the 93 anyway. We have 91 and 96 (plus a bit of 98), and I'd never run 91.
I have driven stock-engine S4 TII's with underhood intakes at well over 100mph with 87 octane in ambient temperatures over 100 F, and never had any detonation problems.
At 100mph, you've got no chance of hearing detonation...
The fact that high intake temps increases the likelyhood of detonation is well proven. Why take the risk?
Old 06-12-02, 10:58 PM
  #11  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
At 100mph, you've got no chance of hearing detonation...
The fact that high intake temps increases the likelyhood of detonation is well proven. Why take the risk?
I disagree. I should be able to hear detonation at 100mph just as well as he could hear it at 80mph. Besides, the reduced timing from the knock sensors should cause a noticeable decrease in power.

If the engine is running well, then the 93 is a waste of money, as the S4 is rated for 87 octane (91 octane in NZ lingo). Granted, his engine may need the 93 though, LOL.

BTW, there is no way that the under hood temps were 160-180 F at 80mph unless the car was being driven over the top of an erupting volcano.
Old 06-12-02, 11:06 PM
  #12  
1JZ powered

 
jspecracer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Detonation

Originally posted by SilverT2
Under hood temps were around 160 to 180.
...were you looking at your water temp gauge when you summarized this? Or do you actually have an ambient air temp gauge underneath your hood?
Old 06-12-02, 11:50 PM
  #13  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by Evil Aviator
BTW, there is no way that the under hood temps were 160-180 F at 80mph unless the car was being driven over the top of an erupting volcano.
Yeah, that does seem a bit dodgy. Maybe it was water temp like Jspec suggested! I have a digital temp display with its sensor on the nose of my pod filter. Without a heatshield, I’ve seen it get over 60ºC (140ºF), but not much more.
Old 06-13-02, 12:14 AM
  #14  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
SilverT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oswego, NY
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ambient outside temps were in the 70's. The car had been run for about a good 15 minutes before entering the hwy. Mind you the detonation happend when going up an incline doing 80. And once on a level ground.

Upon getting home and popping the hood I noticed the radiator hose was shaking from boiling coolant. I also could not keep my hand on the intake, 140-160 is my best guess at how hot it was compared to the outside temps.

This car also has 160k on the clock, 30k jspec turbo. Radiator had been fixed with stop leak. Could my radiator be clogged somehow?

Thanks
Old 06-13-02, 09:20 AM
  #15  
Slow and old

 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: It's a midwest thing.
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found that Citgo and Kwik Fill gas gave me the least detonation. I tend to stay away from Mobil (not that bad) and Sunoco (very bad) as often as possible. What kind of exhaust do you have on the car? If your exhaust has been upgraded, you should upgrade your fuel pump to compensate, and possibly add a fuel controller.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
02-26-19 02:04 AM
Howard Coleman
The Good Businesses
2
09-15-15 10:31 AM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
09-11-15 12:13 PM
A-Spec
General Rotary Tech Support
9
03-15-02 03:52 AM



Quick Reply: Detonation



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.