2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

"Correct procedure for E. Fan Setup"

Old Nov 24, 2003 | 12:29 PM
  #26  
Trav's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
also keep in mind if your elec system is already taxed and you're adding something else to that, it's going to affect other items.

In other words, w/ the stock fan on there, yeah it may be a parasitic drag on the motor, but that's it. With an e-fan, as NZ said, it's still some sort of drag on the motor, but you have also compromised the rest of your electrical system and you now may have charging issues, dim headlights, and other electrical gremlins. In addition you may now have a 70% effective e-fan because it's also not receiving the power it should. In other words, you've lowered your cooling ability more than you expected as well as introduced other problems.

now again, having said that, I still choose to go e-fan. I think the appearance is good and it cleans up the engine bay IMO. Probably also creates some room in there if you need it. But I'm also taking steps to improve the electrical system w/ an FD alt as well as I'll be adding additional grounding, removing other electrical devices and excess wiring (switching to standalone).
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #27  
oregano's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: miss, Ontario
wow. mazda sucks at electrical work dont they? i think i will keep my stock fan cuz i dont need any more headaches with this car. also, i like the idea that the fan is cooling so much at high rpms
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2003 | 12:34 AM
  #28  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally posted by oregano
"

Wouldn't the stock fan GREATLY decrease throttle response and how fast the engine revs? In my mind i see it as a heavy flywheel kinda
Its a *clutch* fan. The fan won't kill rpm accel, because if you were to accel the car to xx rpm, the fan is gradually increassing to xx-y rpm.

The fact that it is a clutch fan is why you can turn the fan blades without turning the engine. The below is an example of a fan that when you turn the fan, the engine crank turns...

Its not like a hard fan like on old muscle cars, where the fan is the same rpm as the engine. My buddy has a 79 camaro, and we got a new fan assembly. Its hard to the rpm, and I stood behind it when he rev'd to about 4000 rpm. Freaking wind tunnel.

If our cars had that type of fan, then yes it would have the affect of a heavy flywheel...

most of those fans are rated at 6k rpm, which basicaly means that the stability of the fan is unpredictable after the engine reaches 6000 rpm.

In reality his engine is a high torque mother that see's its hp below 4.5k anyhow.

Last edited by Kenteth; Nov 26, 2003 at 12:38 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 11:52 PM
  #29  
shiftnmadkwik's Avatar
SUPERnaturally Aspirated
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
most of the flexalite fans are rated to like 10k now, well the good ones at least
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
atticus_jay
Interior / Exterior / Audio
6
Oct 23, 2015 11:16 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Sep 28, 2015 09:25 PM
Boans
V-8 Powered RX-7's
3
Sep 25, 2015 04:34 PM
frijol
Microtech
7
Sep 23, 2015 12:51 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.