2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Is this Convertible a good buy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 10:56 PM
  #1  
MaTT_FoULk's Avatar
Thread Starter
earning these was better
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Richardson TX
Is this Convertible a good buy?

The coupe I went to look at today was sold an hour before I got there ... however he had two other RX7s for sale. For $4000 1988 Convertible 5 speed, 118,000 miles with a possibly rebuilt engine (markings on pieces of the engine lead the current owner to believe it has been rebuilt) the interior is in excellent condition as well as the top.

Or for $2800 an '88 Automatic with 90,000 miles that needs a paint job, but has an excellent interior inlcuding some nice leather seats.

Which is the better buy?

Edit: I plan on getting the car(s) checked out by Rotary Performance in Garland before purchase.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 11:12 PM
  #2  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Well cut the auto one. No point in an rx7 that is an auto IMO. About the vert, its all up to you. If you want a vert and its in great shape then its a good deal to you. Things you might want to think about is that the engine could go at any time now and that the verts are the heaviest of the FCs. If you decide you want the car then definitely go get a compression test done before buying it.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2002 | 11:53 PM
  #3  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
seems a little high, but you might be able to talk them down.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 12:13 AM
  #4  
execelon1's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: sc
go for the vert you'll love it, except when you have to replace the top, which i am about to post on now.PEACE .ex...
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 05:53 PM
  #5  
vaughnc's Avatar
knowledge junkie
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 6
From: Atlanta, GA
88 vert is good if you can verify it's a new engine. Otherwise go find an 89+ vert as it has more hp + torque.

I think the 90 non airbag stickshift is the best of the verts as it has better gearing & is a bit lighterweight than the 91 vert.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2002 | 07:52 PM
  #6  
Madman's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally posted by vaughnc
88 vert is good if you can verify it's a new engine. Otherwise go find an 89+ vert as it has more hp + torque.

I think the 90 non airbag stickshift is the best of the verts as it has better gearing & is a bit lighterweight than the 91 vert.
I can concur after driving vaughnc's vert last night
Although I dont think 4000 is bad for an 88 with a new engine and excellent top.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
astrum
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
24
Nov 15, 2017 08:44 AM
plentymoon
NW RX-7 Forum
4
Sep 5, 2015 08:55 AM
cam_7779
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Aug 18, 2015 07:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.