2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Cone intake on a NA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 12:08 PM
  #1  
Icemark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Cone intake on a NA

I have read now mulitple times for different cars that using a cone intake actually has made the HP lower, and I am wondering if anyone has proof (like Dyno time, or track time) showing that a cone intake actually provides more HP for a NA FC.

Intresting on my V6 Toyota Tacoma, the 2nd gen K&N cone tube intake kit (which runs an almost identical route over the engine that the FC intake does) turned out to have an average of 6 HP less (over the rev band) than the stock filter case, with a K&N panel filter.

Same thing on my SC400 with an aftermarket rice style HKS intake.

So I am again wondering if there really is any proof that the cone filter replacement is worth the investment on a FC.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 12:26 PM
  #2  
skibum9199's Avatar
college student
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Thats an interesting question... I wish I knew the answer. I don't have access to a dyno, but when I put my cone on, I didn't notice much difference, hardly any really. It does look nice though, lol.. I'm curious how a filter that is supposed to flow better than stock lowers hp?


~Jesse
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 12:38 PM
  #3  
AE Turbo's Avatar
Speed from skill
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
I don't think a cone filter does a whole lot on it's own. If you have headers and no cats, I'm sure a cone filter could only help to create a free flowing air system.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 01:56 PM
  #4  
Icemark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by skibum9199
I'm curious how a filter that is supposed to flow better than stock lowers hp?
~Jesse
Obviously more restriction than stock or warmer air from the engine area is raising intake temps.

As far as exhaust, I do have headers on my truck, but have been reluctant to do them on the FC due to noise on the NA FC models.

Last edited by Icemark; Nov 5, 2001 at 01:59 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 03:05 PM
  #5  
Ryde _Or_Die's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,539
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
I just put a come intake on my NA not too long ago & didn't notice any gains at all. I didn't notice any declines in performance either though. I would say you might be trading cooler air for more air if you don't build a cold-air box. That is next up for my car, plus a home-made ram-air system. Then we will see what happens.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 03:19 PM
  #6  
Sully's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: San Jose,Ca 95121
Well here's my opinion on the subject and I'm not a expert by far. So if anything I say is incorrect feel free to correct me. The cone air filter will allow more air to pass through then a stock system. Due to a larger surface area and less of a restrictive passage. This helps out greatly if you have a aftremarket cat-back system. Lets say Racing Beat for example. That should raise the hp say 10% maybe more with that cone air filter. However that would decrease due to the hot air it would be coming from the heat of the motor. Kinda of sucks that Rotary's can get pretty hot. So most people get around that buy having a cold air box. That's why I'm still using the stock air box untill I get that cold air inlet headlight cover and build a cold air box. Remember folks just my opinion and what I hear from other people. Hope this helps out a little.

Sully
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 03:38 PM
  #7  
Red2ndgen's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: wester PA
I got a K&N cone and adapter from ebay. I dont know how accurate this is, however the auction said that when put on a stock 86 gxl w/140k on the engine it made something like 6.7 hp and 5.4 ft lbs on the dyno. As i said i don't know how accurate this is or if the engine was hot at the time(probably not). It seemed to make a small diff on mine while cold, but i dont have a cold air box yet so we'll see.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 06:47 PM
  #8  
asherwood's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
To Mike (AE Turbo)

Cool picture in your signature, where can I get a full size copy
of it? Really shows the 13B engine well...

Thanks
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2001 | 06:56 PM
  #9  
Antonio's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
I put an HKS intake on my stock 88. felt no difference. then put my RB header/presilencer on.(kept the stock original Y pipe and mufflers, going to get something custom there) Removed Air pump Etc. I think i felt a change but that feeling didnt last long. Maybe the custom Mufflers etc will make a difference but who knows. I heard that set adds up to 40hp to the wheels dyno prooved but who knows. I dont think you feel a real change unless its a big change. im gonna most likely get a donor 89+ Tll and street port etc. need big big change.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:38 AM
  #10  
Blake's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 3
I dynoed my GTUs in three configurations: (1) Stock, (2)Cone Intake, and (3) RB downpipe and presilencer, plus cone. Stock, I put down 124rwhp (rear wheel horse power), with the torque curve peaking very low (~3K) and sloping off quickly. With the cone intake, the peak power only went up to 125hp, but the torque curve shifted up in the power band. This gave me more usable power; just not more peak power. Regardless, it was less than obvious without dynoing the car. Then, when I added the DP/PS, the power jumped to 147.3 rwhp with a table-top flat torque curve from 3k-8K. This is very good for a car with the stock exhaust manifold and stock cat back. I also have a fresh air headlight cover and a cold air box, neither of which will show benefits on the dyno so much as they will on the street, due to the ram air effect of actual driving.

Here are some pics of my intake setup, including my fiberglass cold air box:

Intake Setup
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 02:06 AM
  #11  
rotary rage's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: pa
the cone makes the engine breath easier
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 02:16 AM
  #12  
Juan's Avatar
Im a tall midget.
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 6
From: So Cal, USA
Blake:
that cold air box looks REALLY good. How did you make that thing? do you have a how-to on how to make one like yours?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 11:04 AM
  #13  
Icemark's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Cool blake,

That's the kinda info I was looking for
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:24 PM
  #14  
asherwood's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: Victoria, BC, Canada
Great Job!

Very clean, and professional, do you have a set of patterns that
you could share with us?

That is pretty much what the doctor ordered...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 03:37 PM
  #15  
t_mak@mail.plymouth.edu's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Norwich CT
I had a regular 2.5x4 small size cone intake on my car. Didnt gain anything at all from stock. So I put the stock one back on, but instead of fitting the original one back on. I took my spare one, cut out the middle part. So all i have left is a bracket that holds the air filter. With this setup, I actually gain more noise and power in any RPM. The difference is amazing just from cutting the stock air box cover. If you have a good clean filter (K&N) and a spare cover, i definitely would recommand this setup
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 04:56 PM
  #16  
Rx7-88na's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: Marietta, Georgia
Well a cone filter, or an open filter, actually should increase hp a little bit, but will lower torque -- at least that is the case on cylinder combustion engines... most of the time just an open air element will provide little to no NOTICIABLE power increase...The intermediate driver wont even feel hp gains unless they are over 5...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 06:09 PM
  #17  
Turbo Timmy's Avatar
Professional Lurker
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Introducing the Qualley Performance Cold Air Intake System!

Dyno Proven!

Easy to Install!

Great Looking!

Cheap!

Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 08:52 PM
  #18  
AE Turbo's Avatar
Speed from skill
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Re: To Mike (AE Turbo)

Originally posted by asherwood
Cool picture in your signature, where can I get a full size copy
of it? Really shows the 13B engine well...

Thanks
Here's the copy I found on Yahoo Japan. It's a Japanese magazine ad for the FC. I rearranged it and added my car for my sig.


Last edited by AE Turbo; Nov 6, 2001 at 09:21 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 09:24 PM
  #19  
Mykl's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, Al.
Originally posted by Sully
Well here's my opinion on the subject and I'm not a expert by far. So if anything I say is incorrect feel free to correct me. The cone air filter will allow more air to pass through then a stock system. Due to a larger surface area and less of a restrictive passage. This helps out greatly if you have a aftremarket cat-back system. Lets say Racing Beat for example. That should raise the hp say 10% maybe more with that cone air filter. However that would decrease due to the hot air it would be coming from the heat of the motor. Kinda of sucks that Rotary's can get pretty hot. So most people get around that buy having a cold air box. That's why I'm still using the stock air box untill I get that cold air inlet headlight cover and build a cold air box. Remember folks just my opinion and what I hear from other people. Hope this helps out a little.

Sully
Well, my only arguement against that is that you're leaving the intake exposed, right next to the exhaust. Hot air = less dense

So while you could get more air, the temperature of the air may or may not prevent you from actually getting more to the engine. A cold air box like Blake's probably helps significantly.

If nothing else, it's great from an ease of maintenenance standpoint, which is why I have one.

That and the little ****** is noisy. For a while I thought it was my belts makin' all that noise at idle. Then I stuck my ear down next to the filter and noticed that it was actually the intake making all the noise. It isn't noisy like an AEM CAI on a Honda, but it's definitely noticeable over the stock air box.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 12:19 AM
  #20  
Keith's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 501
Likes: 1
From: Lawrenceville,Georgia,U.S.
Hey, I hate to be the lone dissenter on this, but my son installed a Bonez kit from RP on his '88 NA, and both of us noticed an immediate improvement, especially below 4000 rpm! No other mods to the car. Why? I don't know, maybe the original air filter was dirty or something????

Irv, Keith's dad
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2001 | 04:21 PM
  #21  
Gimpdiggity's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Lansing, Michigan
I agree with Irv, Keith's dad. I noticed a bit of a change when I put my cone filter in. It seems to pick up a little better in the lower rpm range.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2001 | 07:43 PM
  #22  
ponykiller's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: KC
yeah,

putting my cone air intake on my 91 vert, I noticed an increase in power in the lower rpm range, along with an increase in engine note (not quite enough for me, though). Have a straight pipe for replacing my main cat, going on next week.

89 TII and 91 vert.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 06:02 PM
  #23  
EvilWankel's Avatar
Knucklehead
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Fife, WA
Would it be cool to put a stock K&N replacement?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 06:23 PM
  #24  
bingoboy's Avatar
Lava Surfer
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
From: Kailua, HI
Originally posted by Keith
Hey, I hate to be the lone dissenter on this, but my son installed a Bonez kit from RP on his '88 NA, and both of us noticed an immediate improvement, especially below 4000 rpm! No other mods to the car. Why? I don't know, maybe the original air filter was dirty or something????

Irv, Keith's dad
i too noticed a pickup at low rpm's with the addition of a cone filter (Apexi setup). a little more power at low revs, and the car seems to run smoother...kind of like when you change out your plugs. plus i love the sound of it .
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 06:56 PM
  #25  
87racer's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
i added a K&n and i dont know if it added or lost horsepower, but i know for sure it helped the throttle response time... this was all after a complete borla exhaust so i didnt really notice a power change.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:53 PM.