2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

cone filter vs. K&N drop-in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-03, 07:01 AM
  #1  
More Than Meets the Eye

Thread Starter
 
MasteRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cone filter vs. K&N drop-in

This question would be mainly for N/A guys. Is there really that much of a power increase to get a cone filter rather that a drop in K&N filter?? Lets consider that one isnt running a cold air box with a cone filter: Would the extra heat intake counteract the cold air benefits of the stock air box/K&N? Even if you have a cold air box, what kind of horsepower gains would a cone filter setup have over the drop in option?

The reason I ask is because I would like to minimize engine noise from the front of my car. I have been running a HKS setup for a few years, and I have been considering switching back to my previous airbox/K&N setup to quiet things down a bit. Any input appreciated.
Old 01-10-03, 03:53 PM
  #2  
knowledge junkie

 
vaughnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
bumpity

You can do the reese setup & just drill 2" holes in your OEM airbox - LOL.
Old 01-10-03, 04:12 PM
  #3  
Do a barrel roll!

iTrader: (4)
 
Rxmfn7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lower Burrell, PA
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I just think its amazing that you can hear your engine noise, my exhaust drones out everything I've never experienced it with a FC, but when my friend had his PGT, he got a K&N drop-in, and about a week later threw it away in favor of a cone setup. A K&N im sure flows more than the stock paper, but it still has to pull it in through the restrictive snorkle. A cone with a cold air box would me much better, and even without a box it I'd think..
Old 01-10-03, 05:20 PM
  #4  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Re: cone filter vs. K&N drop-in

Originally posted by MasteRX
This question would be mainly for N/A guys. Is there really that much of a power increase to get a cone filter rather that a drop in K&N filter?? Lets consider that one isnt running a cold air box with a cone filter: Would the extra heat intake counteract the cold air benefits of the stock air box/K&N? Even if you have a cold air box, what kind of horsepower gains would a cone filter setup have over the drop in option?

The reason I ask is because I would like to minimize engine noise from the front of my car. I have been running a HKS setup for a few years, and I have been considering switching back to my previous airbox/K&N setup to quiet things down a bit. Any input appreciated.
It doesn't make much difference on a somewhat stock NA for the reasons that you gave. You could always just try the drop-in and see what you think, but I doubt that you would be able to notice any performance difference either way. I had a drop-in K&N on my NA, and it worked great. I didn't like the HKS intake on my TII because the element got dirty too fast, and you can't clean it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Devon Murray
Introduce yourself
2
09-25-15 09:41 AM
heywier427
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
2
09-11-15 04:49 PM
msilvia
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
09-11-15 12:13 PM



Quick Reply: cone filter vs. K&N drop-in



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.