2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Compression test numbers: Thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 08:39 PM
  #1  
funkjaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
Compression test numbers: Thoughts?

Rebuilt engine, 450 miles on it when this was done.
S5 TII irons, with 0.002" step wear
Very low mileage FD housings
Low mileage FD rotors
New OEM 2 piece Apex seals
Side seals were all @0.0025"

Stock ports.

#1


#2


Vacuum at cold idle ~750 is about 14. Vacuum at warm idle ~1050 is about 17.

Any input on if these are ok/not ok numbers for the amount of miles on the rebuild at the testing RPM?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2014 | 09:28 PM
  #2  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
640 kPa = 92.8 psi
650 kPa = 94.3 psi
680 kPa = 98.6 psi

620 kPa = 89.9 psi
650 kPa = 94.3 psi
640 kPa = 92.8 psi


8.7 psi variance

The difference between the highest and lowest reading is low (good) but the numbers are low and the vacuum at idle is low for stock ports. Was there any flaking on the edges of the housings? If it starts fast hot/cold I wouldn't worry about it. What numbers are expected for a new engine read with that type of tester?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2014 | 12:13 AM
  #3  
misterstyx69's Avatar
Retired Moderator, RIP
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (142)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 136
From: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
.. you got better Numbers than Billy Dee Williams..(and that engine can't dance!)

at 450 miles that isn't bad.
I've seen numbers lower than that on engines in cars at meets..
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2014 | 10:15 PM
  #4  
funkjaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA (NorCal/S.F. Bay Area)
Good info thanks peeps.

Yeah I agree the vacuum is low, and it doesn't start up right away. I have starter issues right now, and I also have tune issues, as it's very rich on start up. Need to go through the microtech settings and see if I can get a better startup. I'll also triple check for any kind of vacuum leaks to see if I can bring the idle vacuum up higher.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Sep 8, 2015 05:36 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 AM.