2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Compression ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 11:05 PM
  #1  
soundwavetsunami's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Lakemoor, Illinois
Compression ratio

Is there anyway to up the compression ratio on the rotorary engine?

And whats the average hp gain per psi?

thanks
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 11:26 PM
  #2  
YearsOfDecay's Avatar
Locust of the apocalypse
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 2
From: Directly above the center of the earth (York, PA)
The easy answer is no...

The real answer is yes, but only on Turbo cars...

Compression on a rotary is set by the amount of "dish out" on the surface of the rotor, Turbo cars have a larger divot on each face, thus they have a lower compression ratio..

This is why you will see guys running N/A rotors in turbo motors for race purposes.. you get more HP out of it, but the lifespan of the motor can be measure in track passes.

This is also why guys who turbo their N/A motors for street use usually limit their boost to below 10 PSI so that they don't puke their motor in a week of driving!

The idea of a turbo car is to get a larger VOLUME of air into the compression chamber and thus be able to burn more fuel. Squeezing the charge too much will lead to detonation in a hurry as air heats up as it gets compressed (some high compression piston motors will see temperatures of 700F from the compression alone)

In an N/A, the volume is pretty much static, so by increasing the compression, you can squeeze more power out of the available air/fuel, hence, n/a's have a higher compression ratio.

AS for the power / PSI of compression increase.. no freakin clue dude...

for a 13b motor.... there is 1 size of rotor housing and two choices of rotors.. its not like a piston motor where you can bore the cyliners, add larger pistons, deck the heads, or change the stroke length to change the compression ratio.. here, you have two choices!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 11:38 PM
  #3  
andrew lohaus's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: fl
the max you can get is 10.0 (ussing renesis rotors, which is possible but not realy practical for a few reasons). otherwise the options are as follows (assuming they will be used in a peripherial exhaust 13b

9.7---from 89-91 n/a
9.4---from 86-88 n/a
9.0---89-99 all turbos (13bt, 13b-re, 13b-rew, 20b)
8.7 (or is it 8.6?) 87-88 turbo
i cant remember the comp on pre-'86 13b's but im sure it was less than 9.4.

also all of the '89+ rotors are lighter than the 88 and earlier ones.

any of theses rotors can be interchanged in any prepherial exhaust (non renesis) 13b, you just need to make sure you have a matching e-shaft and counterweights for the rotor sets.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #4  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by andrew lohaus
8.7 (or is it 8.6?) 87-88 turbo
i cant remember the comp on pre-'86 13b's but im sure it was less than 9.4.
S4 Turbo was 8.5:1.
Before S4's? Who cares.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #5  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by soundwavetsunami
Is there anyway to up the compression ratio on the rotorary engine?

And whats the average hp gain per psi?
The big question is why would you want to???
Upping CR is lowering your safety buffer.
People who really want to do this already know the answer.
So, why do you want to do this?


-Ted
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #6  
sar's Avatar
sar
Doin a rebuild.
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Roswell (atl ) Georgia
maybe he wants better fuel economy in a NA situation.... apparantly the 9.7s (along with lighter weight) get 1 mpg better than the 9.4s on both city and highway tests

I wonder if you had like a 12.1 compression ratio if higher octane gas would still be uneeded in the long combustion chamber.....
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 09:30 PM
  #7  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by sar
maybe he wants better fuel economy in a NA situation.... apparantly the 9.7s (along with lighter weight) get 1 mpg better than the 9.4s on both city and highway tests

I wonder if you had like a 12.1 compression ratio if higher octane gas would still be uneeded in the long combustion chamber.....
Its been documented by Mazda that above 10:1, the long combustion chamber causes the air-fuel charge to split, killing power and combustion.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 09:32 PM
  #8  
2Lucky2tha7's Avatar
Back at it again!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
From: Western Colorado
This is just added info, nothing more:

ROTOR YEAR COMPRESSION WEIGHT (LBS)
12A-----------------76-82-------9.4---------------10.15
12A-----------------83-85-------9.4---------------9.60
13B-----------------74-78-------9.2---------------11.58
13B-----------------84-85-------9.4---------------11.58
13B N/A------------86-88-------9.4---------------10.04
13B Turbo---------86-88-------8.5---------------10.04
13B N/A------------89-92-------9.7---------------9.54
13B Turbo---------89-92-------9.0---------------9.54
13B Twin Turbo---93-95-------9.0---------------9.54

NOTE: Weights of rotors include rotor bearings, but do not include seals or springs

Brian
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #9  
2Lucky2tha7's Avatar
Back at it again!!
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
From: Western Colorado
Damn, posting it screwed it up!!
Supposed to be:
ROTOR---------YEAR--------COMPRESSION--------WEIGHT (LBS)
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 09:46 PM
  #10  
RX7goZoomZoomBoom's Avatar
Are'nt we all registered?
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis IN
Guys their is a way to create higher compresion rotors.
You Take light weight S5 and you add material to the divits than you use water displacement to measure. This is a messed up way of doing it but it works.
A side note rotor must be rebalanced after this procedure sense you alter the mass of the rotor. I will not tell you what material is used in this process or the technique used to fuse it to the rotor. Im sorry but I went through alot to figure it out. Anyway power gians are not that signifigant at 10.0 you gian around 10hp after about 4k in the power band untill redline.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #11  
Snrub's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
RX7goZoomZoomBoom that's quiet interesting. I hope if you've done something like that you'd share it with others in some way, profitably or not. Did you attempt to go higher then 10:1?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:17 PM
  #12  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by RX7goZoomZoomBoom
Guys their is a way to create higher compresion rotors.
You Take light weight S5 and you add material to the divits than you use water displacement to measure. This is a messed up way of doing it but it works.
A side note rotor must be rebalanced after this procedure sense you alter the mass of the rotor. I will not tell you what material is used in this process or the technique used to fuse it to the rotor. Im sorry but I went through alot to figure it out. Anyway power gians are not that signifigant at 10.0 you gian around 10hp after about 4k in the power band untill redline.
You're lying.
You haven't done this.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #13  
soundwavetsunami's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Lakemoor, Illinois
Arright, thanks alot guys. I was just wondering about that.

And its just that I had heard somewhere that the average hp-gain per psi was 10 hp. and to me that sounds rediculous.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:26 PM
  #14  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by soundwavetsunami
Arright, thanks alot guys. I was just wondering about that.

And its just that I had heard somewhere that the average hp-gain per psi was 10 hp. and to me that sounds rediculous.
Between S4's and S5's, the boost was raised 2 psi and saw a gain of roughly 40 hp.
Between S5's and S6's, Mazda raised the boost 2.5 psi and saw a gain of roughly 50 hp.

Pretty much the only really useful reference point: stock cars to stock cars.
Whenever you compare modded cars, too many factors come in to play for this to work...
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 12:20 PM
  #15  
Snrub's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by scathcart
Between S4's and S5's, the boost was raised 2 psi and saw a gain of roughly 40 hp.
Between S5's and S6's, Mazda raised the boost 2.5 psi and saw a gain of roughly 50 hp.

Pretty much the only really useful reference point: stock cars to stock cars.
Whenever you compare modded cars, too many factors come in to play for this to work...
I think see your point, but we all know that from the S4 to S5 turbo they also upped the CR, etc. and that the HP increase was ~20hp. These factors would only further strengthen your the case I think you were trying to make.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 11:06 PM
  #16  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Snrub
I think see your point, but we all know that from the S4 to S5 turbo they also upped the CR, etc. and that the HP increase was ~20hp. These factors would only further strengthen your the case I think you were trying to make.
Yeah, sorry, it was supposed to be 20 hp. My mind slipped and I thought 162 instead of the correct 182. I remembered that earler today.

My mind is going as I get old.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 07:57 PM
  #17  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by scathcart
Between S4's and S5's, the boost was raised 2 psi and saw a gain of roughly 40 hp.
Between S5's and S6's, Mazda raised the boost 2.5 psi and saw a gain of roughly 50 hp.

Pretty much the only really useful reference point: stock cars to stock cars.
Whenever you compare modded cars, too many factors come in to play for this to work...

the 40hp gain between s4's and s5's can be credited to the compression ratio i guess, but there are a few other things too... (like the change in design of the turbo and manifold)
and compression ratio has nothing to do with the power gain from s5>s6... (they're both 9.0:1) again, the turbos flow way more air and the ports (all being stock) are bigger.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 07:13 AM
  #18  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by soundwavetsunami
Arright, thanks alot guys. I was just wondering about that.

And its just that I had heard somewhere that the average hp-gain per psi was 10 hp. and to me that sounds rediculous.
Who the **** cares?
Just turn up the godamn boost for christsake?



-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #19  
wrankin's Avatar
Old Rotary Dog
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 2
From: Durham, NC
how do you tell which rotor is which

okay, I have a question: how do you identify which rotor is which?

if you are holding a rotor in your hand, and have nothing else to compare it to, how do you tell if it is an S4, S5, NA, TII, etc...?

-bill
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 11:27 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by wrankin
okay, I have a question: how do you identify which rotor is which?

if you are holding a rotor in your hand, and have nothing else to compare it to, how do you tell if it is an S4, S5, NA, TII, etc...?

-bill

Keen to get an answer on this too.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 01:36 AM
  #21  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally Posted by KillerRx4
Keen to get an answer on this too.
S4 rotor dishes are cast.
S5 are machined.

To tell the difference between turbo and non-turbo, you need to measure the dish depth.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 03:10 AM
  #22  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
^ I thought there were miniature Japanese characters or a number stamped (or something) on the face by the apex... I don't know for sure, just remember a dude at Atkins trying to clean off a random rotor's face to show me (after I asked the same question).
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 03:28 AM
  #23  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by eriksseven
^ I thought there were miniature Japanese characters or a number stamped (or something) on the face by the apex... I don't know for sure, just remember a dude at Atkins trying to clean off a random rotor's face to show me (after I asked the same question).
Yes, but it has nothing to do with series.
The characters are there to denote which side is which; it's the equivalent of use labelling A, B, C, etc.


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 05:44 AM
  #24  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by scathcart
S4 rotor dishes are cast.
S5 are machined.

To tell the difference between turbo and non-turbo, you need to measure the dish depth.

Got figures for those measurements scathcart?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 06:52 AM
  #25  
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Measurements I took off a pair of rotors tonight

96.3mm L
53.2mm W
10.88mm D
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbodreamz22
General Rotary Tech Support
28
Nov 10, 2023 11:08 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.