2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Compression question (New, never asked before)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
Project84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Open up! Search Warrant!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 3
From: Kicking down doors in a neighborhood near you
Compression question (New, never asked before)

You guys who have rebuilt engines before know how they can be hard to start after a rebuild and they can show lower compression numbers until they are broken in. I was wondering; what did Mazda do to the engines when the RX-7s were new? I wouldn't think they would sell a car that is a bitch to start cause its engine is new. What did Mazda do to solve this problem?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 11:56 PM
  #2  
Tofuball's Avatar
Jesus is the Messiah
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Thats a really good question.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 12:00 AM
  #3  
YakATK's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Driver's Seat
Re: Compression question (New, never asked before)

Originally posted by Project84
You guys who have rebuilt engines before know how they can be hard to start after a rebuild and they can show lower compression numbers until they are broken in. I was wondering; what did Mazda do to the engines when the RX-7s were new? I wouldn't think they would sell a car that is a bitch to start cause its engine is new. What did Mazda do to solve this problem?
New engines are not a bitch to start if they are stock port or even streetported unless its a HUGE porting job.

When I got my new engine installed in my old NA with a streetport it was still easy to start. Fired up everytime with minimal cranking all the time. Was not a huge port job done on it though. But new does not equal tough to start. Not if its built properly.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 01:09 AM
  #4  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
a new engine or even a rebuilt engine with new rotor housings and seals should be very easy to start and have good compression. the main reason people have trouble with compression numbers on rebuilds is because they have old housings with new seals (takes longer for the seals to seat in the worn housings) or they port them.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 01:16 AM
  #5  
Matt22's Avatar
Fear The RE
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,743
Likes: 2
From: Oregon, USA
that makes alot of sense.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 01:33 AM
  #6  
Project84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Open up! Search Warrant!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,838
Likes: 3
From: Kicking down doors in a neighborhood near you
yes it does
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 02:47 AM
  #7  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
For a change, bitchmill is right about something.

When they were new, every sealing surface in the engine was perfectly shiny, flat, and slick. They didnt make perfect compression, but they did well enough not to have any running issues. Just like a piston engine freshly started up before breakin...good compression, but it will still improve slightly with proper breakin.
Same thing here.

Most rebuilds use one ore more used housings. This isn't the mark of a necessarily inferior engine, but it does mean things won't seal nearly as well to begin with, and thus combusiton won't be as even or complete as it would otherwise be. So they start hard and run rough.

Porting only adds to this issue.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2004 | 03:07 AM
  #8  
reboot's Avatar
i spent more on tires...
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, CA
Originally posted by RotaryResurrection
bitchmill is right about something.
hehe
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 06:38 PM
  #9  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
werd 2 ya *****
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2004 | 06:43 PM
  #10  
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 3
From: Coldspring TX
I had heard so many horror stories on this site about rebuilds being so hard to start/ idle that I was prepared for the worst when I just completed mine, but...new rotor housings, that's the ticket...started up exactly 4 seconds after the key was first turned, and settled at a 900 rpm idle, little lumpy at first, but after 200 miles she's purring at 750 (and I'm just ITCHING to romp on her )
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
lt1_rx7
Blue Ridge Rotary Run
46
Oct 9, 2015 03:11 PM
elfking
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
Aug 19, 2015 09:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 AM.