2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Completely Removing the 6th port sleeves?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-03, 01:54 PM
  #1  
Green Flameless

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Completely Removing the 6th port sleeves?

Hey guys, i read all the time about people wiring their 6th ports perminently open, and i'm elbow deep in a rebuild right now, I was wondering about simply removing the 6th port sleeves all together.. is this a wise move?

thanks
Old 10-06-03, 02:04 PM
  #2  
I dont know a damn thing

iTrader: (1)
 
Rotorific's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Evans, Ga
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If your engine is going to make that kind of power where it is not needed then yes it is a wise move, if it is a stock or even a stage 1 streetport then no keep the sleeves in and tie them off or keep them working.
Old 10-06-03, 02:15 PM
  #3  
Green Flameless

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's what i was looking for, I'm only going to be doing a mild (stage one, [i]possibly[i] stage two stree port... I'll probably just end up tying them off.. . thanks for the help!
Old 10-06-03, 03:51 PM
  #4  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tying them off will only make you loose low end and not gain any high end so FIX them up so they work properly.
Old 10-06-03, 03:57 PM
  #5  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
For once he's right. Keep the port valves operational unless you are doing some extreme porting.
Old 10-06-03, 04:07 PM
  #6  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Come on Aaron thi shas to be like the third or fourt time

Get some pics of the port job that might help people in making a better decission on the port size.
Old 10-06-03, 04:09 PM
  #7  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
Come on Aaron thi shas to be like the third or fourt time
Good point.
Old 10-06-03, 09:24 PM
  #8  
Green Flameless

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alrighty then, functional it is... But isn't having a functional engine sorta... i dunno... boring
Old 10-06-03, 10:09 PM
  #9  
White Comet

 
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orange County
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I removed my 6 ports and grinding it all down when I was NA and the loss of low end wasnt very dramatic. Top end power appeared to increase
Old 10-08-03, 06:27 AM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
White_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate to go against the trend here, but I noticed a marked improvement in the top end of my power band when I took out my sleeves alltogether and kept everything else the same...
Didn't notice any difference in the low end.. possibly because my car doesn't spend long in the sub 4,000rpm territory

This is when my 6-port was N/A of course, I'll bet theres an even bigger improvement to taking them out now that its force fed.
Old 10-08-03, 07:55 AM
  #11  
Junior Member

 
13bgxl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: columbus,OH,USA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I took mine out and ported the manifold, but haven't put it back together yet. One thread I read, Mazdaspeed 7 said he noticed gains in all bands, so thats why I did it. We'll see how it works out.
Old 10-08-03, 09:27 AM
  #12  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by White_FC
I hate to go against the trend here, but I noticed a marked improvement in the top end of my power band when I took out my sleeves alltogether and kept everything else the same...
Didn't notice any difference in the low end.. possibly because my car doesn't spend long in the sub 4,000rpm territory

This is when my 6-port was N/A of course, I'll bet theres an even bigger improvement to taking them out now that its force fed.

Mazda made this system for a reason. They still use it on the 6spd RX-8. There are three basic reasons: Drivability, fuel consumption, and Power.

When your stock you don't reelly notice much if they don't work. When I got my true duals I had just started to notice my ports stop working so I bleaned them out and it was a BIG difference from WORKING to not working. One had been stuck half way open and the otherone just couldn't open at all. I noticed a bit more low end with them working since BOTH were closed now providing more tq down low. I don't think all of us drive above 4k rpms ALL DAY! which is the only situation where it won't make a difference.

Fuel consumption is also a factor because with less tq(wired open or taken out) you waste more gasoline in daily driving at lower and mid rpms. Also when your at or above 4k all four injectors are firing so your fuel consumption goes through the roof.

Power in all RPMs is important to me because I don't drive at 4k like I already said the only time I am above 4k is if I am in a HURRY or on the highway doing 100mph.

If you have a turbo'ed N/a then that would make up for the power loss but the 6 port design is inferior to the 4 port when dealing with forced induction so meh.

Santiago
Old 10-08-03, 12:20 PM
  #13  
Green Flameless

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow, lots of good info here Tough choice, but i think i'm going to go with the whole "properly repair them" trend... i wouldn't mind all the low end i could get
Old 10-08-03, 02:24 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

iTrader: (10)
 
My88Se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as 1987RX7guy said, the functioning system works better. Period.

If you do not care about low end power or you plan on just keeping the revs up all the time, then its fine. Bottom line is that it is your choice. If you take out the sleaves please take out the rods too. They are an even bigger restriction.
Old 10-08-03, 02:42 PM
  #15  
Who owns the Chiefs?

 
Mr. Eccentric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dept 5, Ontario. Canada
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As stated, you'll lose mid range torque, and not gain anything more on the top end. There's no advantage.
Old 10-08-03, 06:30 PM
  #16  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
White_FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
Mazda made this system for a reason. They still use it on the 6spd RX-8. There are three basic reasons: Drivability, fuel consumption, and Power.

If your car is 100% stock then yes, I would agree that the actuated 6-port system is of marginal bennefit.


When your stock you don't reelly notice much if they don't work. When I got my true duals I had just started to notice my ports stop working so I bleaned them out and it was a BIG difference from WORKING to not working. One had been stuck half way open and the otherone just couldn't open at all. I noticed a bit more low end with them working since BOTH were closed now providing more tq down low. I don't think all of us drive above 4k rpms ALL DAY! which is the only situation where it won't make a difference.

You had more power with the zorst dude, of course the difference would be more apparent, its a percentage gain between them not working and working, they don't add a constant ammount of HP or anything.
I'd bet my left nut if you took out your sleeves with that exhaust you would have made another just as apparent increase in your high rpm power band.


Fuel consumption is also a factor because with less tq(wired open or taken out) you waste more gasoline in daily driving at lower and mid rpms. Also when your at or above 4k all four injectors are firing so your fuel consumption goes through the roof.

Secondary injectors also only come online if your at or near WOT, they're not just RPM activated...


Power in all RPMs is important to me because I don't drive at 4k like I already said the only time I am above 4k is if I am in a HURRY or on the highway doing 100mph.

Well thats fair enough for you, I was just adding my input on how it changed my car, I for one am not putting the sleeves back in my motor...


If you have a turbo'ed N/a then that would make up for the power loss but the 6 port design is inferior to the 4 port when dealing with forced induction so meh.

Santiago
No if you had a turbo 6-port without the sleeves the extra flow would allow more power, it's not the 'turbo making up for lost power', there would be less with the sleeves in there working or not. So going by that statement you have alot of experience with 6-port turbos yeah? care to elaborate why they're 'inferior'?
Old 10-08-03, 06:52 PM
  #17  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S4, NA, all emmisions and air pump removed. I was under the impression that if the air pump was removed then there wouldn't be any way for the actuators to work. So I removed them, and with no loss of drivabillity and a gain up top. then my car broke...
Old 10-08-03, 07:08 PM
  #18  
Green Flameless

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North Central PA
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's a good point, Makenzie71. There's no reason for me to put the air pump back on, therefore the actuators won't work anyway, correct?
Old 10-08-03, 07:09 PM
  #19  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
ditto
Old 10-08-03, 08:01 PM
  #20  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Makenzie71
S4, NA, all emmisions and air pump removed. I was under the impression that if the air pump was removed then there wouldn't be any way for the actuators to work. So I removed them, and with no loss of drivabillity and a gain up top. then my car broke...
S5's use the air pump not S4's. Your ports were probably stuck if you noticed a gain up top.

Santiago


If 6-ports are better than 4-ports at forced induction then why did mazda use the 4-port design for all the TII's and for the REW?
Old 10-08-03, 08:40 PM
  #21  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I know...but the S4 used them for the actuaters just the same. My port's were beyond stuck...however...
Old 10-08-03, 08:42 PM
  #22  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no makenzie the S4 only uses the air pump for the catalitic converter NOT the auxilary ports.
Old 10-08-03, 08:44 PM
  #23  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
then what operates the sleeves?
Old 10-08-03, 08:45 PM
  #24  
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.

iTrader: (3)
 
1987RX7guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Laredo, Tx
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
backpressure routed through a small line that comes off of the catalitic conveters(pre-silencer or headers on aftermarket systems) to two small actuators which have arms that rotate the sleeve rods.

Hope that helps. I think it is 3-4PSI that is needed.
Old 10-08-03, 08:54 PM
  #25  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
hmmm...learn something new everyday. Didn't matter anyways, then, because I had my cat's removed and made my own header...12lbs!!!


Quick Reply: Completely Removing the 6th port sleeves?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.