2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Clutch question

Old Dec 29, 2005 | 04:53 AM
  #1  
Green_Streak's Avatar
Thread Starter
slower than granny
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: In Your Dreams
Clutch question

wondering what ya'll think. i'm highly considering a race pressure plate(MT/RB) with a stock disk(don't want one without the wafer spring inbetween the friction materiel) and their aluminum flywheel(MT/RB). anyone have any experience with a setup like this? and or thoughts on said setup
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #2  
nopistons's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
How much power are you making? Is the engine just stock? If you haven't modded the engine, there's really no point in using "racing" clutch pieces. Why do you want to use a "racing" plate? Not lecturing, just curious. And a lightweight fylwheel has consequences for street driving, too, because of the loss of mass.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #3  
Green_Streak's Avatar
Thread Starter
slower than granny
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: In Your Dreams
I told the guys at mazda trix what i'd be doing with the car. street driven with some road racing and that i'm not interested in a clutch without the wafer spring and that's what they suggested. i'm familiar with the results of a lightweight flywheel and they are acceptable to me. i'm not a driver that likes to be coddled, i prefer a machine that is easily controlled (do not confuse easily controlled with easy to control. for those that have driven them hard and know them i consider the AW11 an easily controled car. perhaps a machine that responds consistently is more accurate) and consider a lightweight flywheel a modification that will give the controls a greater resolution. on the pressure plate, really it's just because MT suggested it. a stiff clutch really doesn't bother me, actually i find it amusing when i go from a car with a stiff clutch back to one with a weak one, i don't even notice the clutch pedal below my foot as my foot is trying to go through the floor. almost forgot, yes the engine is stock unless you consider a RB DP/PS and CS catback and a disappearing act performed upon the air pump/ACV to be significant. the engine at some point in the future may very well not be stock, but at this point it is.

Last edited by Green_Streak; Dec 29, 2005 at 10:27 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 10:30 AM
  #4  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
I don't really see that this setup is going to cause you problems...but again why are you bothering if you aren't making the power to require a clutch upgrade?

just trying to eliminate as much parasitic loss as possible?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #5  
J-Rat's Avatar
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
I ran a stock disk with an upgraded PP for a good while with no problems.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
Green_Streak's Avatar
Thread Starter
slower than granny
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: In Your Dreams
oh, i forgot to menition. the stock engine managed to pop the tranny. so while the tranny is being replaced(seeing as it's out already) i figgure what better time to get to all these things as i don't really want to have to go in there again in another however long it takes for my clutch to say "screw you, i'm out". the transmission is pretty much why all this is getting done. i was taking off from a light in 1st and heard a loud snap followed by the car going nowhere. at first i thought it was the driveshaft(i looked and didn't see it on the ground) then figgured maybe the exhaust was holding it up. then about 20 min later it hit me, it was still making noise with the tranny in netural. i restarted it and turns out i have every gear but 1st avilable. so i drive it to the shop doing the work(and i must say the tranny was making some very interesting noises on that drive...) and that's where it is now. any thoughts on why a stock tranny would be going at 136k miles? are they really that weak?

Last edited by Green_Streak; Dec 29, 2005 at 01:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2006 | 10:07 PM
  #7  
1986fc3s's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: california santa ana
[B]hey guys im gonna buy a 1986 fc3s ofcourse it is a mazda rx-7 im only 17 so i dont know much about the car but my dad says that mazdas are crap and i dont know much about them like i said and i dont have anything to say back if he says there crap i dont know what to say againts it to make him buy it
i reallly REALLY want the car its so great the thing is that the car has a blown motor but the guy who is selling it says he will help me replace the motor because he has a short block that he is giving with the car
it sounds graet and all but still MY DAD wont stop with the idea that the car isnt a good car that the reliability sucks and it over heats the parts for the car suck the whole rotary thing is stupid please can some one help me make my dad shut up and make him think or know that the mazda rx-7's are great cars
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Aug 26, 2015 09:52 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 PM.