2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

A cheap & often overlooked intake mod.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 08:08 AM
  #1  
SureShot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
A cheap & often overlooked intake mod.

Actually the factory intake is not that bad. I see many gripes about the "restrictive” intake.
I have looked over my 91, and assuming you have a good air cleaner, the two main restrictions are the AFM (which most of us are stuck with) and the HOOD PROP.

I have yet to see a post about the hood prop.
It stows DIRECTLY IN the intake path.
I removed the stock prop.
To hold the hood up I use an aluminum tube.
It stows in the groove behind the snorkel on the fan shroud.

It has been the first mod done on my last two 7's.

Last edited by SureShot; Dec 6, 2003 at 08:11 AM.
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 08:10 AM
  #2  
truespin88's Avatar
truespin, not tirespin
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Belpre, Ohio
Wow... that's... creative. I would never have thought of that.
Any weight savings with that? (hehe) I jest.
Any noticable increase in response/power?
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 08:16 AM
  #3  
SureShot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
It saves maybe a pound.

It big deal is the stock prop blocks about 20% of the stock intake path.
It's easy to overlook when the hood is up.
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 08:21 AM
  #4  
truespin88's Avatar
truespin, not tirespin
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Belpre, Ohio
I understand that... but does it give you any seat-of-the-pants power?
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
chris-reedtn's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
From: The Boro, TN
Re: A cheap & often overlooked intake mod.

Originally posted by SureShot
Actually the factory intake is not that bad. I see many gripes about the "restrictive” intake.
I have looked over my 91, and assuming you have a good air cleaner, the two main restrictions are the AFM (which most of us are stuck with) and the HOOD PROP.

I have yet to see a post about the hood prop.
It stows DIRECTLY IN the intake path.
I removed the stock prop.
To hold the hood up I use an aluminum tube.
It stows in the groove behind the snorkel on the fan shroud.

It has been the first mod done on my last two 7's.
THis has to be some of the dumbest **** i have ever heard.

-Chris
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 10:26 AM
  #6  
venomrx7's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: South Mississippi
no its not, it really does make sense coause when the hood is down there is no wher for the air to go except right past the prop.
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 12:05 PM
  #7  
Wankel7's Avatar
Haven't we ALL heard this
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
I guess you could use a manometer or a magnahelic gauge to prove your theory. However, I would try to prove it. Placing the hose behind the area in question.

James
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 12:33 PM
  #8  
Chimeron's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
it is interesting, but how much of a difference does it really make? If it really was blocking 20% of the intake it should make a feelable... is that a word.... difference.
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 01:16 PM
  #9  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
Steps for getting more power.... via intake design

1. remove washer bottle assembly. Enlarge stock 1.5" hole to 3"
2. Buy a conical filter and adapter (s5 guys dont need adapter)
3. Build cold air box
4. Remove passenger side brake duck
5. Run a high quailty 3" tube from passenger brake duct inlet on bumper to your new cold air box.

Simple. Effective. Cheap power.

-Markus
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #10  
Relisys190's Avatar
REINCARNATED
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 180
From: South Eastern USA
If you really want to get technical Remove the coolant from flowing around your TB. This really..really helps. You may have some problems in colder area's IE: (Northern regions of america) When you first start you car in the morning (you'll have to help it idle to warm up)

Again. Simple. effective. Cheap power

-Markus
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 01:22 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
you can always get an early 86 coolant overflow bottle. (like my car) and it installs directly behind the leading coil on the fender wall.
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #12  
BlackRx7's Avatar
Daily Domestic Killer
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Tx, USA
really?
I just may have to do that!!!
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #13  
Turbonut's Avatar
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,993
Likes: 68
From: NJ
Just some info on the factory system from my experience:
Must agree that the factory intake system can't be that restrictive. I've cut holes the box, cut the top out of the box, and experienced virtually no change in boost or performance. '89TII Bonez DP, Bonez Hi Flow cat, original factory Y pipe and muffers. The car runs @ 7/7.5 lbs which is to be expected. Installed a reprogrammed ecu and out of the box it topped @ 11 lbs. If the factory intake system was that restrictive, I could have never pulled 11. The car has cold air via the factory system, emissions legal (cat and air pump), fairly quiet, and the boost right where I want it.
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 07:57 PM
  #14  
bejbis's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 381
Likes: 1
From: mobile, al
Re: Re: A cheap & often overlooked intake mod.

Originally posted by chris-reedtn
THis has to be some of the dumbest **** i have ever heard.

-Chris



you know i could see if you said something like removeing something thats directley in the intake path(secondary throttle plates), or if you said something like honeing out the intake. but the hood prop?

-D
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 08:16 PM
  #15  
Mr. Gadget's Avatar
Older than Dirt
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
From: Parts Unknown
Originally posted by SureShot
It saves maybe a pound.

It big deal is the stock prop blocks about 20% of the stock intake path.
It's easy to overlook when the hood is up.

I salute your effort and question your math. 20%, NFW!
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 08:56 PM
  #16  
shiftnmadkwik's Avatar
SUPERnaturally Aspirated
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
in all honesty i dont think the prop rod does much, because the intake isnt really functioning like a ram air system, using just intake vacuum, its gonna pull air from whatever direction it can, around the rod, i could be wrong and you may pick up 30 whp but thats my humble opinion
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 09:06 PM
  #17  
Cory Simpson's Avatar
I wanta be with the BUC!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
THis has to be some of the dumbest **** i have ever heard.

-Chris




How did you do your calculations, that the little tiny 7/16-1/2" diameter hood prop is blocking 20% of your intake?

Ohh ****

you know your hood is block 11876% of your air flow
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 09:14 PM
  #18  
JGard18's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Somerville MA
this is ridiculous. I've heard that many S4 owners are cheap...but come on!
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 09:37 PM
  #19  
Cory Simpson's Avatar
I wanta be with the BUC!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Amen to that!

But we're not cheap, we're just broke!
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 11:19 PM
  #20  
walken's Avatar
Registered Loser
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
From: Whiterock
What is it blocking? The air would flow around it anyway.
Old Dec 6, 2003 | 11:35 PM
  #21  
YakATK's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: Driver's Seat
I must agree that the hood prop would block nothing, the air would go around it with ease, and like someone said its not a ram air setup so its using vacuum to suck air in. This means that the air is just gonna get sucked all around the prop.

If you want a really good cold air intake setup then cut a hole in the sheet metal beside the Rad and re-route the intake into there. My buddy had that setup for his TII and this winter after a nice highway jont if you pulled over and felt the intake it was all stone cold and there was almost frost forming on the filter. Works like a charm.

later
-Justin
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #22  
whiterx7TII's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: long island, ny
i feel dumber for even reading all this...This definatley takes the cake>

OH BOY
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 06:48 PM
  #23  
Cory Simpson's Avatar
I wanta be with the BUC!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 07:42 PM
  #24  
SureShot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
I just logged back on & it looks like some people need a visual aid.
Pictures to come..

Until then the stock intake snorkle gets its cold air from the gap between the hood & the top of the radiator support brace.
That gap is 1-3/8" when the hood is down and the stock prop rod takes 5/16" of that.
Feel free to do the math.

Last edited by SureShot; Dec 7, 2003 at 07:58 PM.
Old Dec 7, 2003 | 07:59 PM
  #25  
Black13B's Avatar
In Full Autist Cosplay
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally posted by Cory Simpson
But we're not cheap, we're just broke!
It's hard to believe that you could represent all the S4 community, what with your $500 7GMTE engine, and all. There's a joke if I ever heard one.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.