2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Camden SC install.. WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-06, 08:34 PM
  #26  
Couldn't stay away

iTrader: (5)
 
F1blueRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Defuniak Springs, FL
Posts: 5,080
Received 145 Likes on 78 Posts
Originally Posted by Archangels
is it just me or is 11.5:1 AFR the perfect spot for an RX7?...

if not on a SC application, what difference would it make from a turbo model?...

I'd go closer to 12.5.
Old 05-02-06, 12:20 PM
  #27  
Tear you apart

iTrader: (10)
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bemidji Minnesota
Posts: 5,883
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Looks good!

I can't wait for dyno numbers.
Old 05-02-06, 01:07 PM
  #28  
Rotary Freak

 
snub disphenoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I loved the customer service I got for that blower. I had problems with belt slip (even after I switched to an electric fan, tried different belts, even considered going to an electric water pump). The solution? A $400 10-rib pulley kit. I put it on, look at the supercharger pulley and say, "that's mighty small". Get the car running, try to go full throttle and it spikes to 21psi before the belt slips...again. Next day the main bearing stack falls out and the rotors melt into the supercharger housing. Camden then told me, "well why were you trying to run so much boost? The supercharger can't handle that!" It took a lot of time to remind them that I ordered an 8psi pulley originally, but at least they were nice enough to send me a new supercharger after insulting my intelligence multiple times.
Old 05-02-06, 07:55 PM
  #29  
Rx-hippie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trainwreck517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snub, what a/f ratios did you tune for?

I was playing with it today on the drive home from work.. and on the low end on before full boost, around 2k-3k it really seems to pull hard at 12.1 rather then 11.0. Going to keep the top end on the rich side, just wondering what a/f to really shoot for that would be safe on this setup.

What about timing, did you retard it a few degrees from the CAS? Or did you just run stock timing?

And was your also a S5 block?

Thanks.
Old 05-02-06, 08:13 PM
  #30  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It always pulls hard right before it blows up.

I wouldn't dare run anything leaner than 11.5 on that thing over 4k rpm. That hairdryer needs all the fuel it can get.
Old 05-02-06, 09:35 PM
  #31  
Rotary Freak

 
snub disphenoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I remember tuning with 11.5 as a maximum allowable AFR. We also tried sampling both tailpipes (fully divided exhaust). We never got into quality tuning as the charger grenaded before that could happen. I was on a S4 block.
Old 05-02-06, 11:37 PM
  #32  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I agree with Sonicrat about the a/f ratio. I would keep it no leaner than 11.5 above 4000rpm. That blower pushes a lot of heat, so cooling would be a great benefit. One member is trying water methanol injection, great low cost idea to cool the charge while the methanol increases octane levels to prevent detonation. Remember the n/a only has 2mm seals (I run S5 TII internals machined to take 3mm seals). Another method for cooling and fuel enrichment combined is nitrous. I am going this route with mine. I am only going to run a 50 shot, planning on initiating it with a full throttle switch and considering an rpm switch as well so it doesn't come in too early. Using a wet shot it will cool intake temps substantially and offer controllable fuel enrichment as well. A supercharger is a different beast, some kill them thinking a smaller pulley will increase boost, when it often causes cavitation and raises intake temps instead. My experience is you can achieve a max of 11lbs boost and tune and drive it to take advantage of the torque and wide power band. Do not expect to push over 7000rpms and find the power of a turbo, it's not gonna happen! Think of it as driving a 454 chevelle vs a 327 camaro for a power band. Throttle response is great, torque is nice, it delivers as promised but fails to fulfill some dreams and hopes though. Max expectation should be about 200 rwhp with great torque, I like mine for what it does for me. http://media.putfile.com/compilation2-57
Old 05-02-06, 11:58 PM
  #33  
Rockn' The Galant

 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just got inspiried to restore a first gen and supercharge it....> : ) that just looks bad ***, despite the #'s it probbaly puts down! Besides a first gen weighs a LOT less, so numbers arent as bad on it as my fat *** car was....
Old 05-03-06, 12:01 AM
  #34  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
More reading on the Weiand blower which is the same as a Camden. http://www.holley.com/data/TechService/Technical/Supercharger%20Tech%20Info.pdf#search='weiandblowe r'
Old 05-03-06, 12:02 AM
  #35  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
http://www.holley.com/data/TechService/Technical/Supercharger%20Tech%20Info.pdf#search='weiandblowe r'
Old 05-03-06, 12:30 AM
  #36  
Rx-hippie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trainwreck517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man thanks for the link, intresting read.
Old 05-03-06, 01:01 AM
  #37  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 84stock
Remember the n/a only has 2mm seals.
All rotaries from 1986 and on use 2mm seals.
Old 05-03-06, 01:11 AM
  #38  
7th Heaven

iTrader: (9)
 
slpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by f1blueRx7
I'd go closer to 12.5.

and you gusy wonder why these motor blow up?

Last edited by Aaron Cake; 05-03-06 at 01:56 PM.
Old 05-03-06, 07:22 PM
  #39  
Rotors still spinning

iTrader: (1)
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
There is no safe a/f ratio if the timing is too far advanced. Even 12.5:1 can be safe if timing is retarded enough. Not saying it would make the most power but it can be made to work safely. No one can say that any certain a/f ratio is dangerous without knowing what the timing is. That is a big mistake that people keep posting over and over again.
Old 05-03-06, 07:30 PM
  #40  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Agreed!
Old 05-04-06, 04:41 PM
  #41  
knowledge junkie

 
vaughnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,595
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 84stock
...trying water methanol injection...to cool the charge
What does everyone think about an Air:Water aftercooler setup? Several supercharger kits for other cars have this configuration, and the cool side of the aftercooler sandwitches between the supercharger & LIM nicely with water lines running between the cool side and hot side infront of the radiator. I'm guessing an adapter plate and gaskets would be all that's needed to adapt this to the Camden/Atkins setup.

Here's some pictures to give you a better idea (yes it's the Whipple core aftercooler).



Old 05-04-06, 04:45 PM
  #42  
Rockn' The Galant

 
Tech_Greek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem is hood cleareance, it's already pushing it with the top of the intake rubbing on the cover under the hood I noticed...Water Injection + Alcy should be sufficient...
Old 05-04-06, 06:19 PM
  #43  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Just get a whipple
Old 05-04-06, 08:33 PM
  #44  
Rx-hippie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trainwreck517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
Just get a whipple
Thats to much $$$ Minus will well slap on a gt40r.. make more power and alot cheaper.. And if you don't want lag, go with GT35R.



I was thinking of water/methonal injection to cool the air.. but I don't want to dump to much money into the car as I'm going to be selling it some time next month. Just want to break even and call it day. Don't want to loose money as I know not people will pay much for a FC. I'd keep it, but I have no room for three cars.
Old 05-04-06, 08:44 PM
  #45  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (5)
 
84stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: calgary
Posts: 5,537
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Damn whipple comments, you gotta do your homework before making this comment! They only make one size and it is about 5 time bigger than the Camden. It's meant for a 350+ cu in v8
Old 05-04-06, 09:42 PM
  #46  
Opinions are like........

 
deadRX7Conv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Prov RI
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There are a bunch of different sized whipple/autorotor/kennebell/lysholm/opcon/sprintex superchargers. These twin screw supercharger vary in size from .32L to 5L. Theres bound to be one that fits under the hood.

Sure, they're expensive. Anyone can do a turbo, but a twin-screw is rare and unique.
Old 05-04-06, 09:55 PM
  #47  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by trainwreck517
Thats to much $$$ Minus will well slap on a gt40r.. make more power and alot cheaper.. And if you don't want lag, go with GT35R.



I was thinking of water/methonal injection to cool the air.. but I don't want to dump to much money into the car as I'm going to be selling it some time next month. Just want to break even and call it day. Don't want to loose money as I know not people will pay much for a FC. I'd keep it, but I have no room for three cars.
Power and cost are up for debate on that, I'm sure I could build one that'd make similar power to a 35R for a relatively close cost.
Old 05-04-06, 11:13 PM
  #48  
Rx-hippie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trainwreck517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eh, no debates in this thread.. thats how all the SC threads ended. I'll agree, twin screw charger would be a much better choice then a roots type blower.
Old 05-07-06, 11:03 PM
  #49  
Rx-hippie

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trainwreck517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Torrance CA
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
update:
Alright I installed my new injectors, which consist of 550 X 2 primary's and 650CC X 2 secondarys.

Well I tuned it a bit today, had to really lean out the SCAFII to get the correct a/f.
All I can say is WOW!

There is a bit of hesitation between 5.5K-6.5K. It doesn't feel like pinging or detonation, more like ignition break up. But I think its just alittle to rich. Seems to hit a rich spot between those rpms, wideband read 10.2 so I will try to lean it out a bit tomorrow..

But as soon as it gets past 6.5k it pulls HARD all the way to 8.5K, nice and smooth with the a/f ratio right between 10.6-10.8.


I think the main reason why people have bad luck with this charger is that the stock fuel system just doesn't cut it. I drove it around with the stock system for about a week, and you just can't take it past 6k without running lean, even with 50% correction and running almost 70psi fuel system it was hitting 11.4 a/f. So anyone else who runs this or any other charger, make sure you have a wideband so you can keep on eye on the mixtures.

But I would deffenitly say that all the work and money was worth it. I will be beating this sh*t out of the car in two weeks at buttonwillow so will see how things go. I kinda feel like putting the 10psi pully and running race gas for mazdafest. So will see how that goes.

I'll do another update once I get it tuned perfectly. I will be dynoing it at mazdafest in two weeks with the 6psi pully, and I'll make sure to post up the graph.

The car will also be for sell next month because I'm purchasing a FD, and don't have room for 3 cars.. Here is a link for the info:
https://www.rx7club.com/a-149/soon-fs-super-chargered-s5-fc-537025/
Old 05-07-06, 11:25 PM
  #50  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
87rx7girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: san antonio TX
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm sexy


Quick Reply: Camden SC install.. WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.