Call me a Fcku tard, but i have and idea....
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coquitlam BC
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Call me a Fcku tard, but i have and idea....
so i was thinking of selling my rb header for a much better stainless SDJ header, i saw a dyno sheet that it made 147rwhp from a 12a gsl, and it only costs about $500 with shipping.
If im going to spend 200 ish on an rb true dual, might as well go big or go home with the SDJ one, i hear that they give atleast 10 more hp over the rb ones.
So how does the above tie in?
With the my header money i was thinking about buying a tiny electric blower than puts out 2-3psi.
yes im talking about the plastic ebay ones that mount between your afm and air filter.
Ya call them cheap off sure POS crap, but i just want cheap power that wont blow my engine up, i figure 2-3 psi wont do **** all if i only run 87 octane. After all VDI and SPI (fords cover of VDI) intakes create about the same about of boost from what i hear....
So i was thinking of getting an ebay electric blower and running a SDJ header.
that combination should put out about 170rwhp right?
like i think with just the magical SDJ header i would be close to 160RWHP, and add 2-3 psi, should put on a good 10-15hp.
Let me re-itterate myself:
-i dont care that its some made in timbucktuu place
-quality of the blower is not a concern, if i get a years use from it and the brushes burn out, id still be happy with the bang per buck
-i just want cheap power, and im going about it with low boost
lastly i think it might be hard to get the point of this post, but heres what im asking:
-2-3psi should be fine with 87? FYI my car is already running uber rich, it starts to constantly back fire like firecrackers at WOT over 4500rpm
thanks
If im going to spend 200 ish on an rb true dual, might as well go big or go home with the SDJ one, i hear that they give atleast 10 more hp over the rb ones.
So how does the above tie in?
With the my header money i was thinking about buying a tiny electric blower than puts out 2-3psi.
yes im talking about the plastic ebay ones that mount between your afm and air filter.
Ya call them cheap off sure POS crap, but i just want cheap power that wont blow my engine up, i figure 2-3 psi wont do **** all if i only run 87 octane. After all VDI and SPI (fords cover of VDI) intakes create about the same about of boost from what i hear....
So i was thinking of getting an ebay electric blower and running a SDJ header.
that combination should put out about 170rwhp right?
like i think with just the magical SDJ header i would be close to 160RWHP, and add 2-3 psi, should put on a good 10-15hp.
Let me re-itterate myself:
-i dont care that its some made in timbucktuu place
-quality of the blower is not a concern, if i get a years use from it and the brushes burn out, id still be happy with the bang per buck
-i just want cheap power, and im going about it with low boost
lastly i think it might be hard to get the point of this post, but heres what im asking:
-2-3psi should be fine with 87? FYI my car is already running uber rich, it starts to constantly back fire like firecrackers at WOT over 4500rpm
thanks
#2
fail..... if in theory it actually blows 2-3 psi then im sure you'll get a gain from it but the concern would be, does it actually blow enough to make the 2-3 psi or does it actually clog up you're intake with a worthless POS. i dunno what to tell you about the gas issue, but if i was you.... i'd just get a turbo swap. dont spend money in something that will give you very little gain.
#5
pwned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
electric blowers DONT work. my friend got one for his celica (ricer piece of ****) and i made fun of him for weeks. it WILL jsut restrict as i know for a fact that my 12a sucks more air in than that little fan will push out.
#7
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
dean23 has a good point. It didn't even occur to me, but really that little fan cannot move air as fast as the engine will on its own. Real turbos/blowers spin much faster than you'd guess.... that thing probably moves at a slower speed than air would move through the intake on its own.
Evil Aviator's example/analogy is a good one. If a $50 electric motor and fan could produce even a slight bit of boost, don't you think companies would be ALL over it, telling you that you can purchase a supercharged car for a mere hundred dollars more than a base model? If that was true, mainstream companies would be all over it. The thing is, it doesn't work, so no reputable company will produce or use that product.
Also, while it claims 2-3lbs boost, it doesn't say on what. I'm sure if you just hooked it up to a 12v circuit, let it suck ambient air, and let it blow on a piece of paper, it probably WOULD produce 2-3 lbs of pressure against that piece of paper. However, we're talking about installing it on an engine that sucks air on its own. Therefore, even if it WAS to produce boost, it wouldn't be anywhere near the 2-3 pounds of boost that they claim. Now, taking into account again the fact that the engine sucks faster than the fan can blow, it seems obvious that this would be more of a hinderance than an aid in your quest for power.
Evil Aviator's example/analogy is a good one. If a $50 electric motor and fan could produce even a slight bit of boost, don't you think companies would be ALL over it, telling you that you can purchase a supercharged car for a mere hundred dollars more than a base model? If that was true, mainstream companies would be all over it. The thing is, it doesn't work, so no reputable company will produce or use that product.
Also, while it claims 2-3lbs boost, it doesn't say on what. I'm sure if you just hooked it up to a 12v circuit, let it suck ambient air, and let it blow on a piece of paper, it probably WOULD produce 2-3 lbs of pressure against that piece of paper. However, we're talking about installing it on an engine that sucks air on its own. Therefore, even if it WAS to produce boost, it wouldn't be anywhere near the 2-3 pounds of boost that they claim. Now, taking into account again the fact that the engine sucks faster than the fan can blow, it seems obvious that this would be more of a hinderance than an aid in your quest for power.
Trending Topics
#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coquitlam BC
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ya i just remembered that a rotary sucks a lot more air than piston engines, so really at high rpms over 5000rpm the intake alone produces about 2-3 psi of boost.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
#10
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
ya i just remembered that a rotary sucks a lot more air than piston engines, so really at high rpms over 5000rpm the intake alone produces about 2-3 psi of boost.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
Furthermore, there's a reason that actual blowers are mechanical. While they do create parasitic drag on the engine, that parasitic drag is less than that which is created when you try to put the extra load of a fan on the alternator, and then use that fan for power. Every time you change energy between different forms, you're going to lose some due to heat, etc. With an actual blower/supercharger, you just convert from mechanical to air power. With the electric fan, you convert mechanical to electric, electric back to mechanical, and then mechanical into wind. That is HIGHLY inefficient. That says something big, considering that superchargers are relatively inefficient anyhow.
#11
ya i just remembered that a rotary sucks a lot more air than piston engines, so really at high rpms over 5000rpm the intake alone produces about 2-3 psi of boost.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
WTF? GTFO
pardon the french but come on
NAs producing boost!? since when? at redline is when they produce the most vacuum.
NAs suck therfore they are always in vacuum.
#12
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
iTrader: (5)
ya i just remembered that a rotary sucks a lot more air than piston engines, so really at high rpms over 5000rpm the intake alone produces about 2-3 psi of boost.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
So in theory i would need an electric blower capable of at least 5psi to see gains. I probably have to change the motor with a high rpm brushless motor paired with a lithium polymer battery pack.
not to stomp your dreams.... but ...... in order for your "e-blower" idea to even be feasible you will need a massive BLDC motor, with a variable pitch blade, you can forget about mounting it in a squirrel box or gearing it for that matter.
not to mention the extra draw from the alternator, cooling of the BLDC motor.
i can think of 1million different reasons this will not work, or be cost effective.
look else where for a little bit of power NOT EBAY
#14
whats a Turbo V?
my uncle had a nice elictric blower on his old 944 Porsche he said it was a nice addition. he sold the car awehile back in favor if a turbo 944 project car so turbo better but name brand E-Blowers not too bad on 944 (cant say the ame about 13B or 12A.
#15
CC of L-Squared Shots
I think you might be better off using flex hose and hooking up your air pump if you still have it to your intake. At least that way, you don't have any defective parts. Go big or go home? Go turbo or go N/A I think is what you're after...
#16
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise Florida
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude
its not about PSI
its about flow
you want to know how much CFM the car pulls in stock
and then get a fan that pushes more
and thats only if you persist on doing this
really, just go get a turbo engine and drop it in
or do what i did, turbo your 6 port..
its not about PSI
its about flow
you want to know how much CFM the car pulls in stock
and then get a fan that pushes more
and thats only if you persist on doing this
really, just go get a turbo engine and drop it in
or do what i did, turbo your 6 port..
#17
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
....I HIGHLY doubt that your uncle installed $50 eBay blower on his Porsche 944 and made it faster..... does your uncle work for one of the eBay crap-parts companies?
...if, however, by "nice addition," you mean "useful for draining power," then yes. That'll accomplish that. Continue on.
#20
Clean.
iTrader: (1)
Theoretical Electric Blower Power Consumption
2.5 psi = 17.3kPa = 17300 Pa
1.308L * 6000rpm = 7848 LPM = 130.8 LPS = 0.1308 m^3/s
17300 Pa * .1308m^3/s = 2263 W
2263 W / 12V = 189 amps
A 100% efficient 2.5 psi electric blower consumes 189 amps.
FAIL. It is impossible for this product to exist.
1.308L * 6000rpm = 7848 LPM = 130.8 LPS = 0.1308 m^3/s
17300 Pa * .1308m^3/s = 2263 W
2263 W / 12V = 189 amps
A 100% efficient 2.5 psi electric blower consumes 189 amps.
FAIL. It is impossible for this product to exist.
#21
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (2)
By the way, you're lucky. Usually we are quick to harass people relentlessly that ask these questions. While I'm being persistent, usually people are flat-out mean when this subject comes up.
#22
FC3S
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: I come from a land downunder
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You may as well run a hose from the intake to next to your drivers seat, that way when you want the extra power you can just blow into the hose, will have the same result and will be even cheaper than the blower.
#24
Retired Moderator, RIP
iTrader: (142)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Smiths Falls.(near Ottawa!.Mapquest IT!)
Posts: 25,581
Likes: 0
Received 131 Likes
on
114 Posts
Buy a leaf blower and put it on..That way when it doesn't Work(because it probably Blows as much air as an Electric..haha..Blower..) you wouldn't have Wasted money on your Car MOD!..and your Yard will look simply Fabulous!
#25
whats a Turbo V?
....I HIGHLY doubt that your uncle installed $50 eBay blower on his Porsche 944 and made it faster..... does your uncle work for one of the eBay crap-parts companies?
...if, however, by "nice addition," you mean "useful for draining power," then yes. That'll accomplish that. Continue on.
...if, however, by "nice addition," you mean "useful for draining power," then yes. That'll accomplish that. Continue on.
though this is not a good idea
http://www.electricsupercharger.com/...0&vehicle=3414
E-ram has ones that actually work but $300 for 8hp i dont think so.
also i second the leaf blower thing actualy i think i saw that on a ricer around here.
Last edited by SouthSideSlider; 02-15-08 at 10:05 PM.