2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

BOV needed?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-11, 01:50 PM
  #26  
I break Diff mounts

iTrader: (1)
 
Digi7ech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Avondale, Arizona
Posts: 4,403
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm a fan of having turbos that last a long time, so I run a bov. Jack hammering a S5 turbo with compressor surge can't be good for it.

I understand what you guys are saying for not using one but what technologies make surge ok in the design of a turbo? Ball Bearing? Certain shaft thickness to take the abuse?
Old 04-13-11, 11:48 PM
  #27  
Now With 10th AE Fun!

iTrader: (1)
 
1SWEET7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is some interesting information I found on performanceforums.com

in Part 2 of our interview, we speak to a leading industry expert Simon Gishus about Nissan engines, Holden Gen 3 V8s, and directions for modifications...

What are some areas where people often make errors modifying their turbo car?

"The classic blow-off valve.

"The blow-off valve is designed as an emissions control device for OE manufacturers. It came about when smaller engines made more and more power using larger turbochargers and bigger intercoolers. As you close the throttle, the build up of pressure and the larger volume inside the intake has to go somewhere; it can't go into the engine because the throttle is shut. Instead, it has to do a U-turn and it comes screaming out the airflow meter. That creates the 'gobble-goggle' sound.

"The gobble-gobble sound is something the public has grown to love.

"The airflow meter is not all that smart and does not realise the air is going in the wrong direction; it therefore measures the air twice (once going into the engine and again going out in the wrong direction). The computer now tips in twice as much fuel as what's required, making it run rich - making it not pass emissions.


"Therefore, manufacturers fit a blow-off valve - or a recirculation valve as they are actually called. A recirculation valve opens when it senses manifold vacuum, returning the air trapped at the throttle body to between the airflow meter and the turbocharger. As such, the airflow meter does not take a double reading - the car now passes emissions.

"Unfortunately, we've had people ringing up and wanting the "audible gear change alarm".

""What audible gear change alarm?" we ask. "You know, when the Sierras were running around and just when they went to change gear it used to go whoda-whoda-whoda" they tell us.

""No pal, that is the dump valve..."


"Some people do think that at the absolute upper extremes of boost levels - about 30-plus pounds - the blow-off valve does, somewhat, save the compressor wheel and shaft from trying to rotate backwards. It doesn't actually rotate backwards at all - all you're hearing is cavitation. What happens is, you've shut the throttle, the turbocharger is doing 100,000 rpm and now has a boost spike of 50 psi. Because it's working in a higher region than what it's designed for, it slips; it basically does a skid like a car tyre does when you dump the clutch. That's the noise you hear - the whoof-whoof-whoof is the air doing a skid."

Is there any performance gain to a blow-off valve?

"We've tested one on a manual gearbox performance car run at Winton Raceway. I think it was running 1 minute 40s back then, but it would lose 2 seconds a lap putting the gobble-gobble valve on. When you look at data acquisition, what you find is - as you change gear - the blow-off valve dumps all the pressure built up through the intercooler and pipes. It then goes back to zero manifold vacuum when you get back on the throttle, you have to build all that boost back up.

"The fact that people think that they keep the turbo spinning is a problem. The people that suggest this have never had an engine on the dyno and never had a turbo tacho in their hands. What people don't realise is, when you shut off the throttle, you shut off the air supply to the engine - this shuts off the exhaust gasses coming out of the engine. When there is no exhaust flow, there is no energy to keep the turbine spinning - the turbo slows down at an alarming rate.

"If you change gears at quite a good speed, you can actually get a boost spike on changes; if you're trying to hold a constant 30 pounds, when you do a racing change you'll get 32-33 pounds when you crack the throttle open again. If everything's working well, you've got a full head of stream waiting to go into the throttle as soon as it's opened.

"I've done this on a rally car and it was quicker through every timed section without a dump valve. You'll never hear a World Rally Car going pssshhht because they don't use a dump valve - you get the woof-woof-woof noise instead."
It makes perfect sense when you think about it as an emission device. Just some more food for thought.
Old 04-13-11, 11:53 PM
  #28  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by HoustonMS3
I am not knowledgeable enough to really comment on the lower psi and other contributing factors of a stock rx7 turbo, but I would imagine most the same principles apply.

There is definitely a reason whey they come on turbo street cars. If you are pushing 20 lbs boost and the throttle snaps shut that pressure can double (if not more) between the throttle body and turbo instantly, and it has the capability of just snapping the shaft on the turbine in the short term and wearing your bearings susbstantially in the long term.

I would imagine that F1 and serious drag cars (a lot of drag cars don't have intercoolers also...) are not as concerned about durability because of their budgets and relatively limited miles driven on it, and possibly because they are always under throttle unlike a street car.

been running mine without a BOV for a while now at 15 psi on a 70 trim turbo(roughly 3 times the size of the puny stock turbos and over twice the factory horsepower), no issues. find some pics of turbo shafts snapping from compressor surge, i doubt you will find any. now if this was talk about 2 step exhaust system surging i might be inclined to agree that it will definitely reduce the life of your turbo and break things, that is a much more volatile surge process.

Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 04-13-11 at 11:59 PM.
Old 04-14-11, 12:53 AM
  #29  
whats going on?

iTrader: (1)
 
SirCygnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,929
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Yes, I've noticed stock JDM S5's with no BPV.

And the 12AT produced 6psi, maybe not enough heat is generated from the compression of 6 lbs to require and intercooler, and a properly sized turbocharger does not require a valve.
it had a carb style intake with venturies and whatnot. most carbureted cars didnt have an intercooler. read up on the reasoning behind this. basically like a blowthrough setup.

I think "It is for noise reduction" attitude is patently false.
so the engineers are wrong?

I work around turbo Diesel motors for John Deere, and certain smaller turbos will destroy themselves when the machine is running full throttle and turned off without idling down. The back pressure of the turbo spooling into a closed block will almost instantaneously result in shaft play. But I think I've gone way off tangent of the original post.
have you tested your theory with hundreds of engines with different turbochargers like ...oh i dont know, an auto manufacturer? or are you speaking from a one time experience? or just hearsay? where did you read this if you read it?
Old 04-14-11, 09:17 AM
  #30  
Rotary Revolutionary

iTrader: (16)
 
sharingan 19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Posts: 3,881
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
...Overboosting is hard on the stock turbos, regardless of the BOV configuration. However, a relief valve would reduce the stress on the turbo, which could make a difference if the turbo is operating past its intended boost range...
"Overboosting" has nothing to do with it. I stayed our of boost as much as possible because I was told "it will destroy your turbo" (an exaggeration perhaps but I now see why he said it). Even when I did boost to avoid being merged on top of or entering the freeway onramp it was never more than 10psi, which hardly qualifies as the "danger zone"

The stock turbo is designed to work with the stock system which includes a bypass valve. For those who claim no ill affects from the absence of such a device fall into 2 categories:
1) Those running non-stock turbos
2) Liars
Old 04-14-11, 10:54 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
HoustonMS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
it had a carb style intake with venturies and whatnot. most carbureted cars didnt have an intercooler. read up on the reasoning behind this. basically like a blowthrough setup.



so the engineers are wrong?



have you tested your theory with hundreds of engines with different turbochargers like ...oh i dont know, an auto manufacturer? or are you speaking from a one time experience? or just hearsay? where did you read this if you read it?
The engineers at Garret clearly state the need and Borg Warner put an integrated bypass valve in their EFR turbos? They are actual engineers, Mr. Gishus is a shop owner with an incredible amount of experience. "so the engineers are wrong?" You have yet to quote an engineer, nor do I think you could. Someone is wrong, or the truth is some where in the middle.

And I have a blow turbo from a 50 HP 1.5L 3 cylinder diesel Yanmar 3TNV84T in my office that it's bearing failure (age also must be considered) was a direct result of back pressure. These smaller turbo's I deal with I'm sure are not made anywhere near the quality of upper end automotive turbos, but It still proves in my mind that the chance of this kind of damage is application/equipment dependent.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 PM.