BOV needed?????
#1
Just cruising
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Weirton, WV
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BOV needed?????
Does the RX7 come from the factory with the BOV installed? If not, do I really need a BOV? If yes, are the more expensive ones a lot better than the $50 eBay ones?
thanks, ashley
thanks, ashley
#2
Just cruising
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Weirton, WV
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Just in case your Google search came up with some bogus internet info:
The car comes stock with a compressor bypass valve, which is like a BOV but when it vents it feeds back into the system to keep the engine running the correct air/fuel ratio. Were it to vent to the atmosphere, the engine would run rich between shifts, causing the engine to bog a bit and reduce acceleration performance.
No, you don't need a BOV or a compressor bypass valve.
Yes, the more expensive ones are better. The cheap ones tend to leak and suck unfiltered air into the system under vacuum.
The car comes stock with a compressor bypass valve, which is like a BOV but when it vents it feeds back into the system to keep the engine running the correct air/fuel ratio. Were it to vent to the atmosphere, the engine would run rich between shifts, causing the engine to bog a bit and reduce acceleration performance.
No, you don't need a BOV or a compressor bypass valve.
Yes, the more expensive ones are better. The cheap ones tend to leak and suck unfiltered air into the system under vacuum.
#5
Now With 10th AE Fun!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is lots of conflicting information on this subject. Arghx has done some testing running without a BOV, I currently run without a BOV and have had no ill effects. The Australians have been running some serious HP cars without BOV's, a lot of race cars including F1 cars of the past have run without BOV's. Search RiceRacing and you will find some of his old posts. From what I could tell by researching the stock BOV is there purely to reduce noise. I'm sure someone will say that damage to the turbo will occur, but we will see. I will definitely post the results of my NO BOV experiment if anything unexpected happens.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not knowledgeable enough to really comment on the lower psi and other contributing factors of a stock rx7 turbo, but I would imagine most the same principles apply.
There is definitely a reason whey they come on turbo street cars. If you are pushing 20 lbs boost and the throttle snaps shut that pressure can double (if not more) between the throttle body and turbo instantly, and it has the capability of just snapping the shaft on the turbine in the short term and wearing your bearings susbstantially in the long term.
I would imagine that F1 and serious drag cars (a lot of drag cars don't have intercoolers also...) are not as concerned about durability because of their budgets and relatively limited miles driven on it, and possibly because they are always under throttle unlike a street car.
There is definitely a reason whey they come on turbo street cars. If you are pushing 20 lbs boost and the throttle snaps shut that pressure can double (if not more) between the throttle body and turbo instantly, and it has the capability of just snapping the shaft on the turbine in the short term and wearing your bearings susbstantially in the long term.
I would imagine that F1 and serious drag cars (a lot of drag cars don't have intercoolers also...) are not as concerned about durability because of their budgets and relatively limited miles driven on it, and possibly because they are always under throttle unlike a street car.
Trending Topics
#8
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
Forum discussion on the subject:
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showthread.php?t=884695
It is for noise reduction, just like intake baffling, body sound deadening material, and exhaust mufflers.
Look at the factory diagram, and you will see that in the stock configuration 100% of the bypass air shoots back between the turbo and AFM. This is by design, and it works just fine.
#9
rotorhead
iTrader: (3)
I consider BOV a personal preference issue. The stock air bypass valve is fine. If you have the stock intercooler and you don't care about sound, there's usually no reason to replace it. I'm sure somebody somewhere on the internet will claim that it leaks. I have bench tested an FD stock air bypass valve, which from what I can tell is pretty much the same as an FC, and found it to hold upwards of 30+ psi. In fact it blew off my rigged-up tester before it leaked.
And yes, my used turbo is still holding up fine to no BOV (I do not have the stock ECU). But that doesn't mean I am encouraging everyone to throw their BOV in the trash. If you have the stock ECU/Rtek and want a fully atmospheric BOV for the sound, plus you are willing to accept the engine running rich between shifts, then by all means go ahead and get one.
And yes, my used turbo is still holding up fine to no BOV (I do not have the stock ECU). But that doesn't mean I am encouraging everyone to throw their BOV in the trash. If you have the stock ECU/Rtek and want a fully atmospheric BOV for the sound, plus you are willing to accept the engine running rich between shifts, then by all means go ahead and get one.
#10
Turbo power, activate!
iTrader: (7)
Im not sure about the stock turbo, but on the turbos of todays, especially ball bearing ones, and ones that has a thicker shaft, you dont need a BOV, especially if you are running at low boost.
Yes it stalls the impellers when it surges, but so far from what I know, it will not damage the turbo but its good to just have one if you want to be safe, or just like the noise :P
Yes it stalls the impellers when it surges, but so far from what I know, it will not damage the turbo but its good to just have one if you want to be safe, or just like the noise :P
#12
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't run a BOV just to make everyone argue with me how I need one, which as Evil said, is not the case.. Its a great conversation at car meets.
Really though, I seem to have better response from the turbo on shifts without a BOV.
Really though, I seem to have better response from the turbo on shifts without a BOV.
#13
rotorhead
iTrader: (3)
Really though, I seem to have better response from the turbo on shifts without a BOV.
#14
whats going on?
iTrader: (1)
with an airflow meter would run a bov if you need to pass emissions and it will cause a rich spike when you close the throttle.
if you dont need emissions, yank the leaky ****** and enjoy better responce.
i dont run one cus they tend to be dumb, and idiots love to argue about how it will make the compressor surge and or stall. but if i recall, stalling a compressor isnt a bad thing at all.
if you dont need emissions, yank the leaky ****** and enjoy better responce.
i dont run one cus they tend to be dumb, and idiots love to argue about how it will make the compressor surge and or stall. but if i recall, stalling a compressor isnt a bad thing at all.
#15
Rotary Revolutionary
iTrader: (16)
My BOV flange didn't ship on time so when I got my v-mount welded up I had no BOV. I did notice slightly better response, but the turbo (stock S5) started leaking oil about a month later, it was perfectly dry prior to that.
No BOV might be just fine on aftermarket turbos (maybe even hybrids) but it is not a good idea on the stock units.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#17
Rotorhead
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes
on
33 Posts
My BOV flange didn't ship on time so when I got my v-mount welded up I had no BOV. I did notice slightly better response, but the turbo (stock S5) started leaking oil about a month later, it was perfectly dry prior to that.
No BOV might be just fine on aftermarket turbos (maybe even hybrids) but it is not a good idea on the stock units.
No BOV might be just fine on aftermarket turbos (maybe even hybrids) but it is not a good idea on the stock units.
The stock RX-7 turbo is a standard Hitachi unit that is similar to other turbos of the same era. The engine type doesn't make any difference in this case.
#18
Just cruising
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Weirton, WV
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks everybody. When I first asked the question nobody immediately replied so I thought it must have been a really dumb question.
I glad everybody responded, it is more info than I found using Google.
ash
I glad everybody responded, it is more info than I found using Google.
ash
#19
whats going on?
iTrader: (1)
there is a large thread about it in the single turbo section of the forum.
https://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-rx-7s-23/8-months-counting-no-blowoff-valve-884695/
#20
Just cruising
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Weirton, WV
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ash
#21
rotorhead
iTrader: (3)
1st gen turbo engines (12A turbo) did NOT have a blowoff valve, or an intercooler for that matter. Here is the turbo on the 12AT
It is labeled as an HT18S. The 2nd gens had an HT18S-2S. Here are pics of the piece that connects the turbo directly to the downdraft-style throttlebody:
You will notice that there is a pop-off valve for overboost protection. This is similar to what you would see on the turbo Z cars of that era.
It is labeled as an HT18S. The 2nd gens had an HT18S-2S. Here are pics of the piece that connects the turbo directly to the downdraft-style throttlebody:
You will notice that there is a pop-off valve for overboost protection. This is similar to what you would see on the turbo Z cars of that era.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, I've noticed stock JDM S5's with no BPV.
And the 12AT produced 6psi, maybe not enough heat is generated from the compression of 6 lbs to require and intercooler, and a properly sized turbocharger does not require a valve.
I think "It is for noise reduction" attitude is patently false. It is not a safe assumption across the board for all turbos, boost levels, and applications.
I work around turbo Diesel motors for John Deere, and certain smaller turbos will destroy themselves when the machine is running full throttle and turned off without idling down. The back pressure of the turbo spooling into a closed block will almost instantaneously result in shaft play. But I think I've gone way off tangent of the original post.
And the 12AT produced 6psi, maybe not enough heat is generated from the compression of 6 lbs to require and intercooler, and a properly sized turbocharger does not require a valve.
I think "It is for noise reduction" attitude is patently false. It is not a safe assumption across the board for all turbos, boost levels, and applications.
I work around turbo Diesel motors for John Deere, and certain smaller turbos will destroy themselves when the machine is running full throttle and turned off without idling down. The back pressure of the turbo spooling into a closed block will almost instantaneously result in shaft play. But I think I've gone way off tangent of the original post.
Last edited by HoustonMS3; 04-12-11 at 01:54 PM.