2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Battery relocation - What's the best cable path?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 06:56 AM
  #26  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by SureShot
I found why my sensor signals were inacurate.
The cheesy primary ground clip had slipped off the firewall spade.
That is not a "primary" ground. Far from it. There is a huge ground wire bolted to the starter motor that goes straight to the battery negative post. That is the primary ground from the engine.

Given that this cable happily carries ~100A during cranking, if the cable is in good condition and it's connections are clean and secure you have to question the worth of adding extra grounds from the engine. The current this wire carries while the engine is running is far less than when cranking.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #27  
SureShot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
That clip on wire is the primary ground for the body (including the ECU)..
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 07:29 AM
  #28  
WAYNE88N/A's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,721
Likes: 3
From: Coldspring TX
Yes NZ, but you have to envision the current flow paths here (or more accurately, the bonding). I, like others, figure the very best spot for that ground is right on top of the starter. That's the component that uses the most "juice", therefore that's where the juice terminal needs to be. Our metal-to-metal contact points on our engines (starter-to-tranny, tranny-to-rear housing, rear housing to rotor housing, etc...) leave something to be desired when considering electrical flow paths. Especially mine now, with hylomar "squished" between them, lol. Do you really want 100A flowing through your rear housing-to-tranny-to-starter mating surfaces?

This is the very reason I installed a stout (10 gauge) bonding jumper right on top of that rear rotor housing ground, directly to the firewall. Now that my starter is directly fed, and that housing ground is directly fed, there is no need for any worries about the conductivity of the housing-to-housing (or tranny-to-starter) contact points. Now, I don't call this an "extra" ground, it is nothing more than a bonding wire, but I guarantee it provides a better electrical path to the chassis "potential" than the OEM setup. SureShot, you may want to try this...You're right, that firewall "spade clip" is cheesy...

Thanks, RETed, exactly the info I was looking for. I reiterate my demands for editing that "grounding how-to" thread so these guys will quit grounding that boost sensor and then wondering why their cars are running like crap...
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2004 | 10:21 AM
  #29  
JET's Avatar
JET
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Southern Ont. Canada
Any links to a comprehensive write-up on relocating the battery on the FC?...thanks
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2004 | 03:10 AM
  #30  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by WAYNE88N/A
This is the very reason I installed a stout (10 gauge) bonding jumper right on top of that rear rotor housing ground, directly to the firewall.
That's basically what I have (except I used two 8GA wires) plus one from the battery negative terminal to a leading coil mounting bolt. I figure any more than that is just silly overkill.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toplessFC3Sman
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Mar 20, 2018 01:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.