Banjo bolt Pulsator dampener
#51
I'm a boost creep...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by RETed
So are you implying the original PD is not new?
I never knew the car was on fire.
The flames were UNDER the car.
My friend saw it cause he was behind me.
The flames were UNDER the car.
My friend saw it cause he was behind me.
I give you props if you could stay calm if you did figure out your car was on fire.
Originally Posted by Rotary_Rocket_87
Fuel pulsation caused by the opening and closing of the injectors is very minimal, and the risk of a failing injector due to this is considerably lower than the risk of a failed PD causing a fire.
#52
2nd Gen. Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
For about the millionth time, this has NOTHING to do with how long injectors last. This is a complete myth that keeps being repeated by people who don't really understand the topic. I don't even know why people would think the injectors could be damaged this way, coz it makes no sense to me. The real reasons for having a PD have been explained many times in all the other threads as Aaron mentioned. Feel free to search for them.
#53
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you ever think thats maybe the jeep's fuel pressure regulator was built to help dampen the pulsation?
Or maybe that the jeep has enough length of rubber fuel lines around the rail to dampen? Or think of the fact that rx7s have abromally large injectors that induce much greater pulsations (a 6 clinder making 200 hp is what, 125cc per injector?)
Or that the engineers who decided a pulstation dampner was needed know a hell of alotmore then you do?(Do you really think the bean counters would have let an unessicery part that costs mazda culmulativly thousands of dollars to install onto their cars fly?)
Or that the fuel injection on a 1987 jeep has absolutely nothing to do with this disscussion?
Or maybe that the jeep has enough length of rubber fuel lines around the rail to dampen? Or think of the fact that rx7s have abromally large injectors that induce much greater pulsations (a 6 clinder making 200 hp is what, 125cc per injector?)
Or that the engineers who decided a pulstation dampner was needed know a hell of alotmore then you do?(Do you really think the bean counters would have let an unessicery part that costs mazda culmulativly thousands of dollars to install onto their cars fly?)
Or that the fuel injection on a 1987 jeep has absolutely nothing to do with this disscussion?
#54
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.injector.com/fueldampers.php
This is why you need one.
Please note that injectors in rotary engines are HUGE compared to most piston motors. Stock 6 liter LS1's only have ~ 250cc injectors. This is why we need a pulsation dampner in our fuel system even more then piston motors. Every generation of rx7 has had one for a reason.
This is why you need one.
Please note that injectors in rotary engines are HUGE compared to most piston motors. Stock 6 liter LS1's only have ~ 250cc injectors. This is why we need a pulsation dampner in our fuel system even more then piston motors. Every generation of rx7 has had one for a reason.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post