2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Back to Square 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2013 | 12:37 PM
  #26  
SpeedLoverD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Vriginia,
Originally Posted by C. Ludwig
Who is "they"? And what harness and ECU are you going to use?
The write up from fc3spro. and was thinking of using Apexi PFC and FD wiring harness(w a front clip).
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2013 | 12:40 PM
  #27  
SpeedLoverD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Vriginia,
Originally Posted by diabolical1
essentially, this is what the central question to this thread is. you want 300+ HP in a daily driven Gen II and your two major ideas of getting it are perhaps the two most difficult that any level-headed person could imagine.

stop trying to skate uphill. put a solid engine in the thing, choose an appropriate turbo, marry them, make them both happy and enjoy driving the car.



this was just funny, so i had to quote it. i might even have to find a way to get it into my signature.
reading this made me laugh to. Well how much work would switching over to a s4 turbo. and just fitting it with an after market turbo to make the power I want.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2013 | 12:43 PM
  #28  
SpeedLoverD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Vriginia,
[QUOTE=AGreen;11622494]Even a well built FC will give you trouble. I just experienced a water pump failure today, and it was only about 2 years old. I'm at the point now that almost everything is new, and even the "new" parts are starting to fail.[/QUOT


well this is my first FC. thanks for the heads up now I have one more thing to watch out for.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2013 | 04:07 PM
  #29  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by SpeedLoverD
reading this made me laugh to. Well how much work would switching over to a s4 turbo. and just fitting it with an after market turbo to make the power I want.
just buying a rebuilt turbo 2 engine has the big advantage in that its essentially stock, so it bolts in.

putting an aftermarket turbo can be complicated, just because there are so many choices, but in the old days it was pretty simple to get an HKS manifold, waste gate, and then a 60-1 T4 turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2013 | 06:40 PM
  #30  
LargeOrangeFont's Avatar
Fistful of steel
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 27
From: OC, So Cal
Why no V8 again..? You seem to be willing to do more work, spend more money and end up with less horsepower than a V8 swap. It will be more reliable than any rotary could hope for... and get better fuel mileage.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2013 | 06:46 PM
  #31  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 64
From: Mile High
I believe that's the cue for "Ripping the soul out of the car" to appear.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2013 | 07:14 AM
  #32  
SpeedLoverD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Vriginia,
Originally Posted by LargeOrangeFont
Why no V8 again..? You seem to be willing to do more work, spend more money and end up with less horsepower than a V8 swap. It will be more reliable than any rotary could hope for... and get better fuel mileage.
lol exactly what clokker said. I got the rx7 for the rotary engine.


But I'm going to make a new thread Ive decided to go with a s4 Turbo(stock). So the new thread will focus on swapping s4 N/A to s4 Turbo.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
lt1_rx7
Blue Ridge Rotary Run
46
Oct 9, 2015 03:11 PM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Aug 26, 2015 09:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.