2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

back pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 09:40 PM
  #1  
z00m7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: stl
back pressure

I've got an '86 n/a fc and knowing that this works on n/a V8's and such to bring up the hp i thought i'd try taking off my muffler system just past the manifold. When i tried to go back and start it up it wouldn't. I'm curious if this was a fluke like a possible flood or did something in the system trip to not let it start. Or is it possible that the rotary needs the back pressure from the exhaust to catch. If anyone else has attempted this or can give me some insight i'd be much appreciative. If this or a variation of this can be done let me know. thx

-z00m
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:19 PM
  #2  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
No, in fact the least amount of back pressure is the best for a rotary.

Exhaust pressure is required for the aux ports to work, but that would not prevent the engine from starting or running.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:34 PM
  #3  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
Just remember that you want minimal backpressure WITH maximum exhaust velocity, which is why you can't put 3.5" piping on an N/A and expect gains.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:50 PM
  #4  
z00m7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: stl
so if possible, the best thing to do would be to run with it unbolted from the manifold?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #5  
slpin's Avatar
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
Originally Posted by arghx
Just remember that you want minimal backpressure WITH maximum exhaust velocity, which is why you can't put 3.5" piping on an N/A and expect gains.

exactly
i do not know why people think they need back pressure


exhaust scavenging and gas velocity... NOT back pressure.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #6  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by z00m7
so if possible, the best thing to do would be to run with it unbolted from the manifold?
well you would burn up your engine compartment...

remember the exhaust on a rotary can hit 1800F
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:55 PM
  #7  
slpin's Avatar
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
Originally Posted by z00m7
so if possible, the best thing to do would be to run with it unbolted from the manifold?

nope, because you can-not get any exhaust gas velocity doing so.

a header and a length of connecting tube (i.e. 26 inches, etc) would yield the best performance.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #8  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by slpin
exactly
i do not know why people think they need back pressure


exhaust scavenging and gas velocity... NOT back pressure.
because people confuse exhaust back pressure with exhaust volocity pressure.

Its like the aux ports.. they work on pressure, so people figure it must be back pressure... instead of just exhaust pressure
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Queppa
New Member RX-7 Technical
11
Nov 18, 2024 03:47 AM
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Mar 28, 2018 03:33 PM
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
Apr 23, 2016 06:37 PM
86glxNA
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
Aug 22, 2015 08:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.