2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Anybody using megasquirt on an NA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:49 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh/Johnstown, PA
Anybody using megasquirt on an NA?

I'm just wondering how you like it and whether its hard to set up the staged injectors.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 06:09 PM
  #2  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
I've got one running on my streetported 6 port 1st gen. I love it. It's simple. Definitely a must have mod. Forget the (S)tupid (A)ir (F)uel (C)omputer that the lazy people like. Megasquirt rocks! There are many rotary people running them. Tech support for rotaries is very easy to come by.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 11:41 PM
  #3  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
Setting up staged injection is very easy. The latest MSNS_E firmware has it built in and it's just a matter of choosing it from a menu in megatune.

Megasquirt is an order of magnitude superior to any piggyback running on the stock ECU. It's a GREAT mod.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 01:52 AM
  #4  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Forget the (S)tupid (A)ir (F)uel (C)omputer that the lazy people like.
Uh, ok...


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 02:12 AM
  #5  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
Uh oh i smell an S-AFC II vs. MegaSquirt war. Tell me why i shouldn't buy the S-AFC II i've seen what 88IntegraLS did, but how much harder is it, and is anyone running the full setup with the ignition control too? I really dont have the money for a Haltech right now.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 03:33 AM
  #6  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
I don't see how there could ever be an SAFC vs Megasquirt war. They aren't even in the same league. Is Ms comparable to a Haltech, Microtech, etc? Maybe in certain ways but every one of them is better than an SAFC. The SAFC is a bandaid to a festering infected wound.

Thanks for your usual insight Ted. You of all people should understand the value of a standalone ecu instead of adding on overpriced underachieving junk. Maybe not though.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 03:40 AM
  #7  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Megasquirt with spark control coming soon to my n/a! Just need to get the engine finished and built, damn porting is holding me up...

I'll report back after I have it up and running, I can't wait!
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 04:06 AM
  #8  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I don't see how there could ever be an SAFC vs Megasquirt war. They aren't even in the same league. Is Ms comparable to a Haltech, Microtech, etc? Maybe in certain ways but every one of them is better than an SAFC. The SAFC is a bandaid to a festering infected wound.

Thanks for your usual insight Ted. You of all people should understand the value of a standalone ecu instead of adding on overpriced underachieving junk. Maybe not though.
thanks for clearing that up, will it work if i keep my emissions and a/c and the dreaded cold start crap?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 06:05 AM
  #9  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I don't see how there could ever be an SAFC vs Megasquirt war. They aren't even in the same league. Is Ms comparable to a Haltech, Microtech, etc? Maybe in certain ways but every one of them is better than an SAFC. The SAFC is a bandaid to a festering infected wound.

Thanks for your usual insight Ted. You of all people should understand the value of a standalone ecu instead of adding on overpriced underachieving junk. Maybe not though.
You're right.
They are not in the same category.
Each has it's own merits and disadvantages.
Each, also, has it's place in terms of upgrades.
To call it "stupid"...for "lazy people" is kinda extreme isn't it?

The S-AFC works.
It's targeted to those who don't have the capability of tuning a MS.
Sure, you can call it a band-aid, but aren't we all slapping a band-aid onto the engine?

A'PEXi has sold THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS (even millions?) of S-AFC.
If it's so crappy, why has it sold so many units?
MS hasn't been around to set it's reputation yet...only time will tell.


-Ted
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 10:30 AM
  #10  
Turbo II-FB's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
From: Austin-Houston Texas
SA is better
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #11  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
no. the reason why the safc is used too much is because the complete cost of switching over to stand alone. megasquirt has solved this problem. with a couple hundre dollars you can have a full stand alone and it will do absolutly everything. plus the afc tunes fia messing with the afm. this is bad.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #12  
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
Green Flameless
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
From: North Central PA
I'm running a Megasquirt on my (ported) NA. I love it. Right now Im' just using a distributor from a 12A, although I'll switch over to the CAS at the end of the season, now that the code is stabilized. It definately pulls harder than it did with the stock ECU, and my fuel milage has increased some, Although I haven't gotten through a whole tank without at least an autocross on it yet, so I don't know what numbers are. I'll shortly (month and half?) be getting a wide band O2, and get some tuning time on a dyno, I'll let you guys know what my numbers are then. I want to make sure I'm tuning properly before I go Forced Induction.

To Summerize - Yes, there are lots of people running in on their NAs. Yes it is worth it. Yes, MegaSquirt does prod serious gluttamous maximus.

I have to agree with Ted here, though. The sAFCs do have a place, but if you're willing to put a little more work in, you'll get amazing results from a Megasquirt. Some people aren't willing to jump in and completely replace the stock ECU
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #13  
Dltreezan's Avatar
My Bick is Digger
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,509
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
im wondering how much I will get in terms of a street ported s4 na and a megasquirt. 88integrals says he saw a great gain with it and would never turn back and is pretty decent to build for yourself if you are inclined enough to do it. The SAFC is a piggyback whereas the megasquirt is a very inexpensive DIY standalone. For the price I would go for the megasquirt for sure, but they are still apples and oranges due to what is involved.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #14  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
yes, but apples youy just eat, and throw away the core. oranges you have to peel and well. i hate them cus they scquirt fluid all into my mouth.

to make a long story short

megasquirt>safc
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 02:25 PM
  #15  
Syonyk's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1
From: Ames, IA
Originally Posted by WonkoTheSane
Some people aren't willing to jump in and completely replace the stock ECU
Or can't do it for emissions reasons. The S4s are safe, but at least in some states, the S5s (and other cars with a check engine light) will have a sensor pulled to confirm that the check engine light works.

It's one thing to have to swap exhaust systems every 2 years for a test. Changing the entire engine management system, especially if you have a custom harness made, is going to be a bit harder.

... and SAFCs are a wonderful way to show just how bad the stock ECU really is. I'm saving up for a full standalone here.

-=Russ=-
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 03:05 PM
  #16  
drakelord's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC
What's the major difference between a Megasquirt and a Haltech? They both allow you full customization over everything pretty much, just Megasquirt is a hell of a lot cheaper. (And you can get prebuilt megasquirts so you don't have to solder either.) But of course, both require a lot more time to tune. Perhaps someone who has an RX-7 as their only car and a daily driver wouldn't have the time to tune one and thus gets a S-AFC as a band-aid for their situation.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #17  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I've had it both ways: SAFC last summer and now a megasquirt running fuel only (for now). The SAFC can produce a GREAT improvement in power and fuel economy, but it is not as adjustable (only two fuel maps on the version I had) and the throttle response isn't as good. Low end torque isn't quite as good either for some reason.

the megasquirt won't give you a whole lot more power than a properly tuned SAFC if you are running the megasquirt in fuel only. However, once you start maxing out the timing map you will see a notable increase in power IMO. MS in fuel only does give more low end torque, absolutely NO more flooding, easier start-ups, and a world more adjustability that allows better transition from cruise to full throttle fuel settings, etc. And it's runs at about 8x the speed of the stock ECU with an SAFC on it, so the motor is much smoother and more responsive.

-one guy's opinion
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #18  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
so a megasquirt would be kinda tough to do since i have to keep my emissions?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #19  
Phantomhp's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock,Tx
You can always check out the Megasquirt Forums for most of your questions.

Megasquirt Forums


Mike
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #20  
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
Green Flameless
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
From: North Central PA
Originally Posted by staticguitar313
so a megasquirt would be kinda tough to do since i have to keep my emissions?
I don't really see why it wouldn't work with emmissions equipment. It can do anything the stock ECU can do, and better. I'm sure you'd have no problems hooking it up with emmissions systems. Besides, if you ran into trouble, you could always use dDuB(?) gauranteed emmsions check method, and just re-adjust your fuel map to deal with the added alcohol
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #21  
7romanstatesmen's Avatar
coolant leak that kills
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: colorado
i've been interested in a ms for quite a while now, but the s-afc was a lot less of a reliability risk for me than an ecu that i assembled myself. now i know that it doesn't do nearly as much, but it helped me get 25 mpg and will help me tune it for some better power as soon as i can get ahold of a wideband o2.

i'm really looking forward to when the ms becomes more widely-used and the support base is bigger. but i've poked around on the ms forums, and there's definitely enough info to help out a lot, i just don't trust myself enough to do it yet.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
From: California & Florida
I think the MS sounds like a dream come true. I can lose the failing engine harness that is 17 years old and replace the "stupid" ECU & have control over whatever I decide to hook up to the damn thing. Knowledge is power... if I know whats going on & have the ability to control it I have defeated the mechanical limitation of design & substituted an adjustable & visible system. I've been waiting for something just like this to make my radical research design possible.

Ramses666
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 06:27 PM
  #23  
Syonyk's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1
From: Ames, IA
Passing a tailpipe sniffer with a Megasquirt or such isn't a problem. The problem is passing the harder visual tests with it. If you have a state that just glances under the hood, sticks a sniffer up the tailpipe, and runs - no problem.

The problem is when you have a state that does a strict visual and functionality check. One of the main problems is handling the check engine light - I don't know of many aftermarket ECUs that will light a check engine light up if a sensor is disconnected. Also, if the EGR & such are tested, you'd need to be driving those solenoids as well.

Doable, yes. Easy? Not really.

-=Russ=-
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #24  
WonkoTheSane's Avatar
Green Flameless
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
From: North Central PA
Do you get to be in the car when it throws a check engine light? I know this may sound stupid, BUT, you could always rig a switch to the CEL. He pulls the connector, you hit the buttion, and wha-la, you have a CEL. Or, use a remote control for it Just keep on eye on what he's doing, and put the button when you need the CEL to show up...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Sep 14, 2015 07:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.