2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Almost together! Here's the modified 6 port manifold (to four port)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-03, 09:13 PM
  #1  
I came, I saw, I boosted.

Thread Starter
 
Bambam7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Almost together! Here's the modified 6 port manifold (to four port)

Ok, I've got the engine.. it's in the hatch. I'm converting it to a mid-engine setup.
Uhh, ya right.
Anyways, The last of the pre-assembly modifications are complete. This involved converting an S5 VDI 6 port intake manifold to be able to bolt on to the (now) 4 port block.
The VDI is operational though it'll open very early (whenever 2.5 lbs of boot is reached!) But it'll at least give me a little bit of torque boost below about 2200 rpms.
I suppose I could put an orifice, then a bleed in the vacuum line to the vdi to let it open later- I might mess around with that... I'm not sure how the reversion wave frequency changes once air is compressed.... it'll be trial and error finding the best switchover RPM.

Any- the manifold... I had to cut the bridge off (jigsaw) and grind away to get the ports the right size and proper flow. Then I filled the top part with 2 part putty epoxy (Steely) and shaped it accordingly for flow. The port shape looks a bit wonky- and it is- There are some very thin casting walls, that inhibit exact shaping, but it's pretty damn good. I shaped the gasket accordingly, there will be no problems with flow! I like the profile better than the TII manifold anyways, it has a longer radius to curve around and meet the engine...

Well... Basically the only difference between this engine and my last one will be slightly lower compression rotors, (86na compared to 90na)and the 4 port housings instead of 6 port ones.
The builder of my engine swears that 4 ports flow better, but we'll see. I'll be able to find out first hand which flow better by simple applied comparison!

Last edited by Bambam7; 04-21-03 at 09:15 PM.
Old 04-21-03, 09:18 PM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
projekt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from the picture it doesn't seem that much different, but i was wondering if anyone's ever though to make a manifold for the 6 port so that you don't need the rotating valves, but you could just butterfly off a runner like most every other variable geometry system.
[/thread hijack]
Old 04-21-03, 10:08 PM
  #3  
I came, I saw, I boosted.

Thread Starter
 
Bambam7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not that different?
Here's a pic of a 6 port gasket.
It's much different- the ports are totally offset from each other.
Old 04-21-03, 10:19 PM
  #4  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally posted by projekt
i was wondering if anyone's ever though to make a manifold for the 6 port so that you don't need the rotating valves, but you could just butterfly off a runner like most every other variable geometry system.
For some bizzare reason, this is exactly what the European-spec FC 6-port engines have; butterfly valves in the LIM instead of rotating sleeves in the block! I didn't believe it until I saw the pics posted here a while ago. I don't know which system would work better, since the port sizes looked the same and there was still an open butterfly in the airstream.

Sorry to continue the hijack Bambam, that's intersting looking work you're doing.

Last edited by NZConvertible; 04-21-03 at 10:24 PM.
Old 04-21-03, 11:11 PM
  #5  
...94% correct.

 
Makenzie71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: High Texas
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I've got a bizzare idea...why not use the LIM from an S4?
Old 04-22-03, 03:03 AM
  #6  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
hIGGI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Czech Republic [www.rx7cz.net]
Posts: 4,985
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally posted by NZConvertible
For some bizzare reason, this is exactly what the European-spec FC 6-port engines have; butterfly valves in the LIM instead of rotating sleeves in the block! I didn't believe it until I saw the pics posted here a while ago. I don't know which system would work better, since the port sizes looked the same and there was still an open butterfly in the airstream.

Sorry to continue the hijack Bambam, that's intersting looking work you're doing.
I don`t know reason too, but our Euro spec manifolds with valves works fine off vac. plenum even u convert to headers and midpipe (no cats)
Old 04-22-03, 12:15 PM
  #7  
I came, I saw, I boosted.

Thread Starter
 
Bambam7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Makenzie71
I've got a bizzare idea...why not use the LIM from an S4?
I don't understand.... the LIM's for all N/A's (86-91) are all 6 port, and all the TII (86-91) are 4 port... regardless of being S4 or S5.

Anyone have any thoughts on the VDI system and actuating point???
Old 04-22-03, 05:32 PM
  #8  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
You should use a solenoid valve and rpm switch for the VDI, because it probably is opening to early to give you maximum benefit. Use a dyno to get the VDI actuation point. Do one run with it closed and another where it opens. Where the two lines cross is where you should set it.
Old 04-22-03, 06:18 PM
  #9  
Glock Lover

 
TonyTurboII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Currently residing in St Charles, MO
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You N/A guys are crazy.
Old 06-02-09, 03:12 PM
  #10  
Back at it again!!

iTrader: (3)
 
2Lucky2tha7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here I am 6 years later and I was wondering about this exact idea today and luckily I found this thread, although it's a bit vague. My reasoning is because I originally had an aggressively ported 6-port setup over a year ago with both the VDI and sleeves wired open. It had tremendous top end power for an N/A, but the low and mid-range were pretty much non-existent. That eventually ended abruptly when after 25k miles or so, one of the pineapple sleeves came loose and shot to the back of the aux. sleeve and knocked the pin out and then the sleeve went back into it's place and the steel pin got sucked in and destroyed the rotor, end housing and rotor housing as well as a few seals. Out of frustration, I decided to go with a streetported 4-port setup using my N/A rotating assembly and TII irons. Now, after 10k miles or so on the 4-port setup, I was just thinking about mating up the n/a s5 intake assembly I still have to take advantage of the vdi setup and see if I can get some gains from doing this. Has anyone else specifically done this and have any feedback on it? I'm wondering if I should waste my time epoxying and shaping the LIM and re-tuning my maps or just building it up again as is --(yes, it's apart again).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doritoloco
New Member RX-7 Technical
7
09-05-15 12:41 PM



Quick Reply: Almost together! Here's the modified 6 port manifold (to four port)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 AM.